Advanced Search Results

Raj Kumari Sharma Vs. Rajinder Nath Dewan and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 111

Reported in : AIR1987Delhi323; 1987(13)DRJ139

and female heirs in view of changed social and economic conditions. The provisions of Section 111 of the Succession Act, 1925 and the intention of the testator to benefit his legal heirs in his Will of 1942 is to

Janaki Amma and ors. Vs. Raveendra Menon and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Travancore Nayar Act, 1100 - Sections 22; Hindu Law; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 111

Reported in : AIR1981Ker205

to a class of persons, then the thing bequeathed by the operation of Section 111 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, goes only to persons belonging to that class as are alive at the testator's death. But to this

Dr. Mahesh Chand Sharma Vs. Smt. Raj Kumar Sharma and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 111, 119 and 120; Constitution of India - Articles 133 and 136; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6 Rule 2; Hindu Succession Act 1956 - Sections 14 and 15

Reported in : AIR1996SC869; JT1995(8)SC466; 1995(6)SCALE809; (1996)8SCC128; [1995]Supp6SCR41

house.(5) On the language of the 1942 Will, it is the exception to Section 111 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 that applies and not Section 119 or for that matter Section 120. Since it was a bequest to

A. Narayanan and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 111

Reported in : AIR1967SC433; [1967]63ITR466(SC)

made to class of persons, then the thing bequeathed by the operation of section 111 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, goes only to persons belonging to that class as are alive at the testator's death. But to this

T.B. Sri Rangi Vs. Asia Bai

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 111, 112 and 121

Reported in : AIR1959Mad475

as the disposition did not offend against the rules contained in Section 113 to 116 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. (In a case of gift or other transfer Inter vivos subject to the provisions in Chapter H of … the contention raised on behalf of the respondents by Mr. P. S. Balakrishna Iyer when he relying on Section 111 of the Indian Succession Act with special reference to illustration 6 thereto, contended that all the children of

Gandabhai Ranchhodji Gandhi Vs. Noshir Ka Vasji Sabowala and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 11 and 111; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 116; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12, 12(3) and 13(1); Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 213 and 227

Reported in : AIR1994Guj18; (1993)1GLR238

this court.22. The matter can be looked at from a different angle also. Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 provides that no right as executor or legatee can be established in any Court of Justice, unless a … instant case. (3) There was no denial of the title by the tenant and the reliance placed on Section 111(g) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was not well founded. (4) Even if the provisions of Section

A. Narayanan and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 111

Reported in : AIR1963Mad179; [1963]47ITR740(Mad)

will pay the costs to the department. Counsel's fee Rs. 250. Family - bequest - Section 111 of Succession Act, 1925 - dispute regarding bequethment of property of deceased - bequest was in favour of grandson of deceased -

Ramniklal Amritlal Shah Vs. Bhupendra Impex Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 21(1), 111 to 114, 212 and 213; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 4 and 44; Partition Act, 1893 - Sections 4(1); Straits Settlements Limitation Ordinance Act, 1896 - Sections 17

Reported in : AIR2001Bom224; 2001(2)ALLMR592; 2001(2)BomCR479; (2001)1BOMLR670; 2001(2)MhLj536

was quick to point out that these Judgments were rendered prior to coming into force of the Indian Succession Act. 1925. and that the language used in sections 111 to 114 of the 1925 Act made a qualitative difference … Madhuben @ Mridulaben Amritlal Shah who had filed the suit before this Court. The suit was filed invoking Section 44 of the Transfer of Property Act and Section 4 of the Partition Act, 1893. The case was

Smt. Chandra Vasa Vs. Smt. Dulesari Devi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 111

Reported in : AIR2004All350; 2004(4)AWC2930

appeal is devoid of any merit and is dismissed with costs. Family - will - Section 63 of Succession Act, 1925 and Section 111 of Evidence Act, 1872 - testatrix had two daughters X and Y - after death

Pushpa Bala Jagam Vs. K. Ananda Kumar,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 222, 255 and 276; ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68, 103 and 111

40 of 1993. The plaintiff, who filed a petition under Sections 222, 255 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to grant probate, which was converted into testamentary original suit, is the appellant before this Court.2. The appellant … Ors.), wherein the Apex Court has held as follows:15. The case before us could certainly not fall within Section 111 of the Evidence Act. There is no presumption of law or fact in this country that a woman