Advanced Search Results

Sunderlal Chourasiya Vs. Tejila Chourasiya and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 107 and 109; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8

Reported in : AIR2004MP138; 2004(2)MPLJ193

the finding on this issue has become final. The trial Court by applying Section 109 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short 'the Act') held that the heirs of Chhiddilal (Defendants 2 to 8) would be entitled for

K.V. Krishna Veni and ors. Vs. K.K. Rajagopal and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 106, 107 and 109

Reported in : AIR1990Ker337

namely, Meenakshi takes the whole of B schedule property by virtue of operation of Section 106 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.7. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondents contended that it is Section 109 that is applicable to

Mavila Chathoth Vasudevan Nambiar Vs. Mavila Chathoth Krishnan Nambiar ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 74, 103 and 109

Reported in : AIR1987Ker88

with costs. Property - will - plaintiff filed suit for partition - Sections 74, 103 and 109 of Succession Act, 1925 - defendant claimed partition on ground of will executed by deceased property owner - plaintiff stated that deceased … described in A schedule to the will had been bequeathed, had pre-deceased the testator. Accordingly and based on Section 109 of the Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925, the heirs of Madhavi Amma, namely,defendants 4 to 9 claimed

Shanti and ors. Vs. Bhagwani and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 107 and 109; Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1984P& H313

1. Whether the words 'any child' used is Section 109 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 means 'one child only' or it can mean 'children' also, as the case may be, is the main

Karail Singh and ors. Vs. Smt. Mohinder Kaur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 109; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8

Reported in : (2003)133PLR79

below that the present case is covered either by Section 106 or by Section 107 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). It was submitted that by virtue of Section 106 of the Act, … 3/8th share each of the estate of the testator. On the other hand, it was argued that under Section 109 of the Act, the legacy of the pre-deceased son would be inherited by the widow-defendant No. 1. Both

Smt. Gita Devi Vs. Smt. Munder Devi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 105, 107 and 109

Reported in : AIR1980All372

direct the parties to bear their own costs. Family - inheritance - Sections 109, 107 and 105 of Succession Act, 1925 - the legatee died in the lifetime of her testator-mother leaving behind an issue - entitled under the … of the appellant isthat she succeeds to the legacy of herdeceased mother in view of the provisions of Section 109 of the Indian SuccessionAct, hereinafter referred to as the Act.Learned counsel for the respondent contended that the provisions

Surjit Kaur Vs. Bhupinder Kaur and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR2009P& H73; (2009)153PLR469

bequeathed property would be taken away by other surviving legatee in terms of Section 106 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short 'the Act') or if the legatee dies during the life time of the testator leaving behind … heir and has no lineal descendant, should the mother take the share of that legatee in view of Section 109 of the Act and whether mother is a lineal descendant.2. The facts firstThe appellant is the mother-in-law of

B.K. Gupta Vs. Ravinder Seth

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Hindu Succession Act; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 381; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 109, 114, 120B, 193, 199 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195 and 195(1)

Reported in : 2007(97)DRJ604

21. As a back up to the challenge it is urged that under Section 381 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 the effect of a certificate with respect to the debts and securities specified therein has to be treated … mutation of the name as the registrant. 33. I fail to understand as to to which substantive offence Section 109 or Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code stand attracted in the facts and circumstances of the instant

Kuberdas Devchand Soni Vs. Jerkish Naoroji

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1941)43BOMLR981

did act as administratrix of the estate, then by reason of Sections 211 and 307 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the estate would be bound by the mortgage. It is true that she was in fact an administratrix … a true construction of the deed she did act as administratrix of the estate, then by reason of Sections 211 and 307 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the estate would be bound by the mortgage. It … Bom. L.R. 988, and Mancharsha Ashpandiarji v. Kamrunisa Begam (1868) 5 B.H.C.R. 109 In Mithibai v. Limji Nowroji Bmaji (1881) I.L.R. 5 Bom. 506. it

R. Ramachandran Vs. G. Hariharan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263 and 317; Madras High Court Original Side Rules, 1956 - Order14, Rule 8 - Order 25, Rule 62; Tamil Nadu Court fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1955 - Sections 55 to 59; Evidence Act, 1872; Income-tax Act, 1961; Probate and Administration Act - Sections 50

Reported in : (2001)2MLJ417

of O.S. Rules read with Order 25 Rule 62 of O.S. Rules and Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Order 14, Rule 8 read with order 25 Rule 62 of O.S. Rules respectively by a common … (Petitioner in O.P.) To condole the death of his father viz., V.V. Raghunathan, the said advocate visited No. 109, St. Mary's Road, Chennai-28 on 17.12.1990 and he asked the appellant and his brother Kasi Viswanathan to call