Advanced Search Results

Sinnaraj Pillai and ors. Vs. Ramayee Ammal and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 106 and 107; Hindu Law; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 144

Reported in : AIR1969Mad96; (1967)2MLJ639

April, 1934, and the true scope and effect, if any, of Sections 106 and 107 of the Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), in relation to that will. The suit properties, a tope, originally belonged to one Chinnathambia … that on the death of Muthammal. the second wife Meenakshi Animal took the entire estate in terms of Section 106 of the Indian Succession Act. If the plea of joint bequest is upheld and Section 106 applied there

Koppula Surareddy (Died) and ors. Vs. Koppula Venkata Subbareddi and o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 106

Reported in : AIR1960AP368

learned brother, Bhimasankaram J.,and dismiss these appeals with costs. Family - bequeathing property - Section 106 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 - property bequeathed by will in favour of wife and son - under terms of will on death

K.V. Krishna Veni and ors. Vs. K.K. Rajagopal and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 106, 107 and 109

Reported in : AIR1990Ker337

namely, Meenakshi takes the whole of B schedule property by virtue of operation of Section 106 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.7. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondents contended that it is Section 109 that is applicable to

Mah. Gen. Jonathan Reuben Samson Vs. Zillah Solomon and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 106, 138, 211, 255, 263, 278, 301, 303 and 304; Bombay High Court Original Side Rules - Rules 374 and 375; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Rule 20, Order V

Reported in : AIR1991Bom222; 1991(1)BomCR334

legacy given to Zillah and Lily is one given to two persons jointly. Section 106 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 applies to this bequest. Section 106 reads: 'If a legacy is given to two persons jointly, and one

Surjit Kaur Vs. Bhupinder Kaur and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR2009P& H73; (2009)153PLR469

bequeathed property would be taken away by other surviving legatee in terms of Section 106 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short 'the Act') or if the legatee dies during the life time of the testator leaving behind

Hem Raj Vs. Mathra Das

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 106 and 107; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 57

Reported in : AIR1952P& H197

a half share under the Will, Ex. D. 1, as it was governed by Section 106 of the Succession Act and that the defendant was the sole heir of Rainsaran Das, the testator, and the plaintiff was not … and bequeathed to them the whole of his estate in equal shares and gave certain other directions. In 1925 Ranji Das alias Ram Ratan Das died leaving a son Hem Raj, plaintiff. In 1929 Ramsaran Das died,

Ram Kumar Das Vs. Jagadish Chandra Deb Dhabal Deb and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 110; Transfer Of Property Act - Sections 106, 107 and 116

Reported in : AIR1952SC23; [1952]1SCR269

Rs. 46 was paid for the first time on 8th of March, 1925. The next payment of rent was made in the succeeding year, on … and as the new tenancy was for building purposes, it was a tenancy from month to month under section 106, Transfer of Property Act, terminable by fifteen days notice. As the notice was proper and sufficient, the trial … predecessor. There might have been, according to the learned Counsel, two tenancies for one year each for two successive periods, but on the expiry of the second yearly lease, which happened on 7th December, 1926, the defendant

S. Sudaramurthy and Others Vs. Saraswathi Lakshmanan and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

in favour of defendants 1 and 2 is void. Attention is drawn to Section 122 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which reads as follows: 122. Onerous bequests. “ Where a bequest imposes an obligation on the legatee, he … with an obligation or a legacy made in her favour. A suit of the nature contemplated under Article 106 the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963, may be noticed: Description of suitPeriod of limitationTime from which period

Stephen Court Limited Vs. the Official Trustees of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property limitation

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 53A;; Registration Act, 1908 - Section 49;; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10 and 13;; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 273, 274, 300 and 302;; City Civil Court Act, 1953 - Sections 2(5), 5(3) and 22;; Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 25 and 26;; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 11 - Order 1, Rule 13 - Order 6, Rule 4;; Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules - Rules 3 and 13;; Indian Companies Act, 1913;; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Section 27A;; Bombay Rents Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947;; Constitution of India - Article 311(1);; Rent Control Act - Section 11;; Land Reforms Act - Sections 106 and 125(3);; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 17

Reported in : (2000)2CALLT1(HC)

and estoppel. It was further submitted that the appellant's application was maintainable under section 302 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and the order passed thereon could not be void. On the merits the appellant submitted that even though … appellant on the ground envisaged in section 11 of the Rent Control Act. The plea of entitlement under section 106 of the Land Reforms Act was available to the appellant in the eviction proceedings viz, that the Rent

Mohinder Lal and ors. Vs. Tule Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 106 and 113; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 337

Reported in : AIR2006HP103,2006(2)ShimLC142

a legacy is twelve years from the date when the legacy becomes deliverable. Section 337 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 says that an executor is not bound to pay or deliver any legacy until the expiration of one … suit for a legacy against an executor and the limitation for such suit is twelve years, per Article 106 of the Limitation Act, 1963. No doubt, in a suit of the present type where the defendants are