Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: succession act 1925 section 103 · Page 1 of about 235 results (0.051 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 27 1987

PravIn Kumar Vs. P. Rajeswaran and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-27-1987

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2(H), 74, 87, 92 and 213; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 103

Reported in : AIR1988Mad132; (1987)IIMLJ481

- Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Sections 2 (H), 74, 87, 92 and 213 of Succession Act, 1925 and Section 103 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - whether person who got power to divide properties and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2010

Pushpa Bala Jagam Vs. K. Ananda Kumar,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-22-2010

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 222, 255 and 276; ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68, 103 and 111

40 of 1993. The plaintiff, who filed a petition under Sections 222, 255 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to grant probate, which was converted into testamentary original suit, is the appellant before this Court.2. The appellant … such a case. We think that a plea of undue influence, where set up, is a special plea, Section 103 of the Evidence Act places the burden of substantiating such a plea on the party which set it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 1986

Mavila Chathoth Vasudevan Nambiar Vs. Mavila Chathoth Krishnan Nambiar ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-10-1986

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 74, 103 and 109

Reported in : AIR1987Ker88

with costs. Property - will - plaintiff filed suit for partition - Sections 74, 103 and 109 of Succession Act, 1925 - defendant claimed partition on ground of will executed by deceased property owner - plaintiff stated that deceased … described in A schedule to the will had been bequeathed, had pre-deceased the testator. Accordingly and based on Section 109 of the Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925, the heirs of Madhavi Amma, namely,defendants 4 to 9

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 21 2003

Godi Jayarami Reddy and anr. Vs. Siddamurthy Jayarami Reddy (Since Die ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-21-2003

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 122 and 141

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD212; 2004(2)ALT135

decided under the provisions of Indian Succession Act.Issue No. 1:13. Part-VI Indian Succession Act deals with the Testamentary Succession Act, 1925, Section 57(c) deals with the wills and codicils made by any Hindu with regard to the succession of the … and would have asked for a share in the properties but that was not done in this case. 103 for the year 1975. 56. On analyzing the oral as well as documentary evidence, it leads to irresistible

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2000

K. Andi Reddiar Vs. Ovu Ammal and 5 Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-01-2000

Subject : Contract

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 101, 102 and 103; Specific Relief Act, 1963 -- Sections 34 and 37; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 151 -- Order 39, Rule 1; Succession Act, 1925 -- Sections 59, 61 and 63

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC184

151 Order 39 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Sections 59, 61 and 63 of Succession Act, 1925 - Whether Lower Appellate Court committed error of law in requiring plaintiff to prove will - onus of … of the trial court is restored. The parties shall bear their respective costs throughout. Contract - conveyance - Sections 101, 102 and 103 of Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 34 and 37 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2001

Veeramallayyagari V. Sitaram Vs. Payala Chandrasekhar, Minor Guardian ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-13-2001

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4; Hindu Succession Act; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 30, 59 and 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 67 and 68; Indian Contract Act - Sections 25

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD143

In any event, the Will is not properly proved in accordance with Sections 59 and 63 of Indian Succession Act. 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, if the Will is disbelieved, defendants 3 and KMs. 4

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1991

Rajrani Sehgal Vs. Parshottam Lal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276

Reported in : 46(1992)DLT263

thereafter a petition for grant of probate/letter of administration under the provisions of Section 276/278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act') was filed by respondent No. I on the basis of a will, dated 9th … (6) Mr. Lonial placed strong reliance on .a judgment of the Judicial Committee reported as Xii Indian Appeals 103, Sookhmoy Chander and Another v. Srimati Manohurrt Dasi, holding that : 'Where It clearly appeared that a Hindu

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1996

Reddi Demudu Vs. Kannuru Demudamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 5, 53A and 54; Registration Act - Sections 17 and 49; Evidence Act - Sections 93 to 95; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 2; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100, 103 and 106; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(24)

Reported in : 1996(3)ALT384

Act reads thus -'Settlement, means an instrument, (other than a will or codicil) as defined by the Indian Succession Act, 1925 whereby the destination or devolution of successive interests in the moveable or immoveable property is disposed of or … to be considered, the rule Under Section 106 of C.P.C. will not become absolute and the provisions of Section 103 of C.P.C., would empower the Court of Second Appeal to go into the facts and evidence also. What

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2007

Sunita Shivdasani Vs. Geeta Gidwani and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-08-2007

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 to 189 and 190; Hindu Wills Act, 1870 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2007Delhi242

Will.3. By the impugned order dated 22nd May, 2006, learned single Judge has held that under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short), there can be Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must … 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 95, 86, 89, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, … Privileged and Unprivileged Wills. Unprivileged Wills must be in writing and should also comply with the requirements of Section 63 of the Act. Privileged Wills can be made by a soldier employed in an expedition or engaged

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1962

Santosh Kumar Mondal and ors. Vs. Nandalal Chakrapani and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-17-1962

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rules 2, 3, 9 and 11 - Order 41, Rules 4 and 33

Reported in : AIR1963Cal289

to abate, see Order 22, Rules 1 and 11 C. P. C, and Section 306 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Since the right of appeal from the whole decree was vested in each appellant severally, the right survives … Mt. Chand Kour v. Pratab Singh, 15 Ind App 156 (PC) which decided that the similar bar of Section 103 of the 1882 Code corresponding to Order 9, Rule 9 C. P. C. 1908 did not operate as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial