Advanced Search Results

Bandopant Sitaram Bapat by His Heirs Arun Bandopant Bapat and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 82, 83, 84, 85, 88 and 95

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR96; (2002)1BOMLR256; (2002)ILLJ436Bom

of the Will in the sense of user and enjoyment of the property by way of absolute ownership.7. Chapter VI of Indian Succession Act, 1925 deals with construction of Wills. Section 82 provides that the meaning of … limited interest in the immovable properties to Bhagirathibai. Referring to Sections 82, 83, 85 and 88 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, the learned counsel for appellants submitted that the meaning of the Will needs to be collected from the … consists following members :(1) Sau. Bhagirathibai wife of Sitaram Bapat, aged about 46 years.(2) Chi. Bando Sitaram Bapat, aged about 30 years.(3) Chi. Shankar Sitaram

Mrs. Nalini NavIn Bhagwati and Others Vs. Chandravadan M. Mehta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263 and 295; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rules 9 and 13

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)414; AIR1997SC1055; (1998)1GLR202; JT1996(10)SC258; 1996(8)SCALE60; (1997)9SCC689; [1996]Supp7SCR631

the probate but directed to treat the application as a suit filed under Section 295 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short, the 'Act'). Feeling aggrieved by the latter direction, these appeals have come to be filed.4. Shri … itself gives indication as to the manner in which the proceedings could be dealt with at different stages. Chapter IV of Part IX clearly indicates that when an application is filed for probate it should be dealt

In Re: the Goods of Late Ravinder Kumar

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 225; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 9 and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 and 149; Sucession Act, 1925 - Sections 276 and 278

Reported in : AIR2004All46

Sri J. Nagar that the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure save as otherwise provided in the Indian Succession Act, 1925 have been made applicable to the proceedings in relation to the grant of probate and Letters of Administration.10. … Ravinder Kumar with Will annexed, after the Registrar General gives certificate of satisfaction of payment of Court-fee under Chapter XXX, Rule 9 of the Rules of this Court.'5. It has been averred in the aforesaid Civil Misc. … Palani Gramanl case (supra), it was laid down as follows (at pages 487 and 488 of the said AIR) :'................When a case is registered as

Ajit Datt Vs. Mrs. Ethel Walters (Decd.) Through L.Rs. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 4, 15(1), 18, 24, 25, 29, 29(1) and (2), 36, 37 to 40 and 47; Indian Succession Rules, 1925 - Rules 6 and 39; Adoption of Children Act, 1926 - Sections 1(1) and 2, 3 and 5(2); Adoption of Children (Amendment) Act, 1949; Adoption Act, 1976 - Sections 39(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 50, 57(1); Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 12; Punjab Laws Act, 1872 - Sections 5 and 7; Oudh Estate Act, 1869; Sri Pratap Jammu and Kashmir Laws Consolidation Act, 1977; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 21 and 372; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887; Indian Majority Act, 1875; General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3(57); Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 - Article 16(1); International

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC3270

of U. P. is concerned, intestate succession of Indian Christians is governed by the provisions contained in Indian Succession Act, 1925 and any custom prevalent in the State in this regard would, for the purpose of succession be irrelevant … On account of the contest the petition for grant of Letters of Administration filed under Rule 6 of Chapter XXX of the Rules of the Court was converted into a suit in accordance with the Rule 39 … She claimed to have succeeded to the estate of deceased under Section 47 of the Act. The petition was contested by the appellant Ajit Datt

John Vallamattom and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15, 25, 26, 27, 32, 44 and 372; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3, 4, 5 to 49, 51, 58 to 191 and 212; Charitable Uses Act, 1735; Mortmain and Charitable Uses Act, 1888; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1891; Charities Act, 1960; Indian Succession Act, 1865; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92; Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Sections 213 of the Indian Succession Act; Indian Divorce Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC2902; 2003(5)ALD51(SC); 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)283; 2003(4)AWC2689(SC); 2003(3)CTC418; [2003(4)JCR44(SC)]; JT2003(6)SC37; 2003(3)KLT66(SC); 2003(5)SCALE384; (2003)6SCC611

Constitution of India we are concerned with the constitutionality of the provisions of Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. Petitioner No. 1 is an Indian citizen and is a Christian Priest … provides that every person of sound mind not being a minor may dispose of his property by Will. Chapter VII of the Act deals with void bequests.7. Section 118 is contained in the said chapter which reads … sect or tribe residing therein from the purview of Sections 5 to 49, 58 to 191 and 212. Testamentary succession has been dealt with in

Although in G.Gopal Vs. C. Vaskarreported at 2008 Vol 10

Court : Kolkata

Subject : MRTP

Act. In order to sustain a caveat, a caveatable interest must be shown. Section 284 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 does not lay down the qualification and disqualification of the caveator. Once a caveat is lodged and a … on 10th January, 2017 without obtaining any leave as it was beyond time prescribed under Rule 25 of Chapter 35 of the Original Side Rules. In any event the caveat does not disclose legal grounds of objections … [Krishna Kumar Birla versus Rajendra Singh Lodha and Others reported at (2008) 4 SCC300. Although in G.Gopal vs.C.Vaskar reported at 2008 Vol 10 SCC489a bench

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 in respect of her Will dated 4.4.1985 before the Civil Judge, Senior Division Pune. This was granted by the … the said Act defines œDistrict Judge? to mean the Judge of a Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction. Chapter IV of the said Act which concerns 'practice of granting and revoking probates and letters of administration' comprises

Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise Vs. the Union of India, the Law and Judici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court Act,1869 is void on grounds of inconsistency with and repugnancy to the Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. The declaration and consequential reliefs have been sought in the following facts and circumstances: A) On 25.3.1997, … 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 in respect of her Will dated 4.4.1985 before the Civil Judge, Senior Division Pune. This was granted by the … the said Act defines œDistrict Judge? to mean the Judge of a Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction. Chapter IV of the said Act which concerns 'practice of granting and revoking probates and letters of administration' comprises

MA I Kovoor @ Anna Kovoor Vs. Thomas Ipe Kovoor (Jr.) and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

Probate C P is filed under Part IX, Chapter IV, S. 278 r/w S. 219 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 praying to grant letters of administration to the petitioner to the estate of the deceased Elizebeth Ipe Kovoor, … Mary Mathews (biological sister), aged 64 yrs, living in Kottayam Kerala; (Not objecting vide memo dated 22.5.2012) Respondent 4 Mr Mathew Ipe Kovoor (biological brother), aged 62 years, living in Kothamangalam, Kerala; (contesting respondent) Respondent 5 Capt.

Ms. M. A. I. Kovoor @ Anna Kovoor Vs. Mr Thomas Ipe Kovoor (Jr.)

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

Kerala Respondents Probate C P is filed under Part IX, Chapter IV, S.278 r/w S.219 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 praying to grant letters of administration to the petitioner to the estate of the deceased Elizabeth Ipe Kovoor, … Anna Kovoor 60 yrs, D/o late Thomas Ipe Kovoor (Sr.) Presently r/a # 105, Purva Parkridge Mahadevapura, Bangalore 48 (By Mr LPE Rego for M/s Rego & Rego, Adv.) And 1 2 3 Mrs Molly Anthony D’Souza