Advanced Search Results

Venidas Nemchand Vs. Bai Champabai

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1929)31BOMLR1014

cases not provided for by this chapter or by the rules of procedure laid down in the Indian Succession Act, 1925, or by the Civil Procedure Code. But we have here a definite Rule, viz., Rule 602, which lays … I do not think that the defendant can be allowed to set up the alleged will of December 23, 1926, by way of a counter-claim.5. As far as I know the practice in this Court has been

Priyanka Vivek Batra Vs. Neeru Malik and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 16 - Order 2, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 7, Rule 11; Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 4, 4(1) and 4(2); Specific Relief Act - Sections 34 and 41; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 58; Indian Succession Act, 1925

Reported in : 154(2008)DLT354

estate of the deceased by applying to the probate court under Part VII, chapter XXIII of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. It has been held in Cotton Corporation of India v. United Industrial Bank : [1983]3SCR962 that the relief … relief of protecting the estate of the deceased by applying to the probate court under Part VII, chapter XXIII of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. It has been held in Cotton Corporation of India v. United Industrial

Ravindra Nath Agrawal Vs. Yogender Nath Agrawal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

The Indian Succession Act, 1925 is divided into 11 parts, with some of the parts sub­divided into several chapters. Part VI of the Act comprising of 23 Chapters, contains exhaustive provisions relating to “Testamentary Succession”. Sections 57 … the Will dated 06.04.2011 annexed thereto, under Section 276 read with Sections 250 and 273(b) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Upon receipt of summons in the said testamentary case, the daughter Lily Nath 5 came up with the

Smt. Rajrani Sehgal Vs. Dr. Parshottam Lal and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 87, 82, 114, 138, 276 and 278; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 62, 63 and 68; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1992Delhi134

thereafter a petition for grant of probate/letter of administration under the provisions of Section 276/278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act) was filed by respondent No. I on the basis of a Will, dated 9th … appellant sought to canvass for interpreting Section 138 is not tenable for the reason the heading of the chapter in which this section occurs indicates that this section as well as succeeding sections deal with bequests in … law contemplates grant of probate in certain cases as contained in Sections 237 to 239 of the Act, in the absence of original will. The

Rajrani Sehgal Vs. Parshottam Lal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276

Reported in : 46(1992)DLT263

thereafter a petition for grant of probate/letter of administration under the provisions of Section 276/278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act') was filed by respondent No. I on the basis of a will, dated 9th … sought to canvass for interpreting Section 138 is not tenable for the reason that the heading of the chapter in which this Section occurs indicates that this Section as well as succeeding Sections deal with bequests ingeneral, … law contemplates grant of probate in certain cases as contained in Sections 237 to 239 of the Act, in the absence of original will. The

Rupa. B. P. Vs. Assistant Revenue Officer

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1925.26. The Succession Act, 1925 is divided into 11 parts, with some of the parts subdivided into several chapters. Part VI of the Act comprising of 23 Chapters, contains exhaustive provisions relating to “Testamentary Succession”. Sections 57 … as the beneficiary under the Will, is not required to obtain probate from competent court under the Indian Succession Act, 1925.7. As per the provisions of Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, the provisions of testamentary succession are

Rajrani Sehgal Vs. Parshottam Lal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68

Reported in : 47(1992)DLT192; 1993(25)DRJ338; 1992RLR126

a petition for grant of probate/letter of administration under the provisions of section 276/ 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Act') was filed by respondent No.1 on the basis of a will, dated 9th September, … sought to canvass for interpreting section 138 is not tenable for the reason that the heading of the chapter in which this section occurs indicates that this section as well as succeeding sections deal with bequests in … and shop No.5571 and 5569, Nai Sarak, Delhi and shop No. T- 23, Hardhian Singh Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi and moveable properties from. the

Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Th. Lr. . Vs. State of Kerala .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

certain properties.-This Act shall not apply to- (i) any property succession to which is regulated by the Indian Succession Act, 1925, by reason of the provisions contained in section 21 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954; (ii) any estate … Kerala, as evidenced by later amendments making specific provisions in relation to Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple and its administration. Chapter II of Part I of the Act deals with the Travancore Devaswom Board, Section 2(c) defines the incorporated … Varma (D) Thr. LRs. & Anr. vs. State of Kerala and ors. 23 (2) It shall come into force at once. “1. (1) This Act

Sadaram Suryanarayana and anr. Vs. Kalla Surya Kantham and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

two provisions the latter shall prevail over the earlier.15. Time now to refer to the provisions of Indian Succession Act 1925, Chapter VI whereof deals with construction of Wills. Some of the principles of interpretation of Wills that are statutorily … eastern portions (two on the ground floor and two on the first floor) bearing door Nos.44-23-35/7, 44-23-35/6, 44- 23-35/1 and 44-23-35 situated at Railway New Colony, Visakhapatnam was originally owned by late Smt. Kalla Jaggayyamma, who passed

Shamsunder Rajkumar Vs. Bharat Oil Mills

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 17, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 19, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1, 2 and 3; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 17 and 25

Reported in : AIR1964Bom38; (1963)65BOMLR584; ILR1963Bom436; 1963MhLJ414

Life Assurance Company (1944) 46 Bom. L.R. 767 : S.C. [1944] A.I.R. Bom. 351, referred to. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … up and verified as per Order 19, Rule 3, of the Civil Procedure Code and the instructions in Chapter XXIII, Civil Manual, Volume I. If it is not properly drawn up or verified, it ought not to … Rule 3, of the Civil Procedure Code and the instructions in Chapter XXIII, Civil Manual, Volume I. If it is not properly drawn up or