Advanced Search Results

H Srinivas Rao Vs. Niranjan Rao

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

introduction part wherein it is held that what is a caveatable interest within the meaning of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The counsel also brought to notice of this Court paragraph 27 wherein it is held that chapter XXXV … himself as RW1. The Trial Court having considered both oral and documentary evidence placed on record in paragraph 16 taken note of the relationship between the parties and particularly taken note of the fact that the fourth

MA I Kovoor @ Anna Kovoor Vs. Thomas Ipe Kovoor (Jr.) and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

Probate C P is filed under Part IX, Chapter IV, S. 278 r/w S. 219 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 praying to grant letters of administration to the petitioner to the estate of the deceased Elizebeth Ipe Kovoor, … descendants and since the biological parents of deceased Elizebeth viz., her father Thomas Ipe Kovoor (Sr.) died on 16.8.1988 and his spouse Annamma Ipe Kovoor (nee) Mathew died on 6.11.2003 and all the members of the family

Ms. M. A. I. Kovoor @ Anna Kovoor Vs. Mr Thomas Ipe Kovoor (Jr.)

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

Kerala Respondents Probate C P is filed under Part IX, Chapter IV, S.278 r/w S.219 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 praying to grant letters of administration to the petitioner to the estate of the deceased Elizabeth Ipe Kovoor, … descendants and since the biological parents of deceased Elizabeth viz., her father Thomas Ipe Kovoor (Sr.) died on 16.8.1988 and his spouse Annamma Ipe Kovoor (nee) Mathew died on 6.11.2003 and all the members of the family

John Vallamattom and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15, 25, 26, 27, 32, 44 and 372; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 3, 4, 5 to 49, 51, 58 to 191 and 212; Charitable Uses Act, 1735; Mortmain and Charitable Uses Act, 1888; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1891; Charities Act, 1960; Indian Succession Act, 1865; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92; Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Sections 213 of the Indian Succession Act; Indian Divorce Act

Reported in : AIR2003SC2902; 2003(5)ALD51(SC); 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)283; 2003(4)AWC2689(SC); 2003(3)CTC418; [2003(4)JCR44(SC)]; JT2003(6)SC37; 2003(3)KLT66(SC); 2003(5)SCALE384; (2003)6SCC611

Constitution of India we are concerned with the constitutionality of the provisions of Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').2. Petitioner No. 1 is an Indian citizen and is a Christian Priest … provides that every person of sound mind not being a minor may dispose of his property by Will. Chapter VII of the Act deals with void bequests.7. Section 118 is contained in the said chapter which reads … the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 states that restrictions in Sections 14, 16 and 17 shall not apply in the case of a transfer of

Ajit Datt Vs. Mrs. Ethel Walters (Decd.) Through L.Rs. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 4, 15(1), 18, 24, 25, 29, 29(1) and (2), 36, 37 to 40 and 47; Indian Succession Rules, 1925 - Rules 6 and 39; Adoption of Children Act, 1926 - Sections 1(1) and 2, 3 and 5(2); Adoption of Children (Amendment) Act, 1949; Adoption Act, 1976 - Sections 39(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 50, 57(1); Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 12; Punjab Laws Act, 1872 - Sections 5 and 7; Oudh Estate Act, 1869; Sri Pratap Jammu and Kashmir Laws Consolidation Act, 1977; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 21 and 372; Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887; Indian Majority Act, 1875; General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3(57); Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 - Article 16(1); International

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC3270

of U. P. is concerned, intestate succession of Indian Christians is governed by the provisions contained in Indian Succession Act, 1925 and any custom prevalent in the State in this regard would, for the purpose of succession be irrelevant … On account of the contest the petition for grant of Letters of Administration filed under Rule 6 of Chapter XXX of the Rules of the Court was converted into a suit in accordance with the Rule 39 … presented a petition in Allahabad High Court for grant of probate on 16.9.1960, which was registered as Testamentary Case No. 10 of 1960, Para 6

In Re: the Goods of Late Ravinder Kumar

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 225; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rules 9 and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148 and 149; Sucession Act, 1925 - Sections 276 and 278

Reported in : AIR2004All46

Sri J. Nagar that the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure save as otherwise provided in the Indian Succession Act, 1925 have been made applicable to the proceedings in relation to the grant of probate and Letters of Administration.10. … Ravinder Kumar with Will annexed, after the Registrar General gives certificate of satisfaction of payment of Court-fee under Chapter XXX, Rule 9 of the Rules of this Court.'5. It has been averred in the aforesaid Civil Misc. … of the estate of the deceased Ravinder Kumar.4. By the order dated 16th August, 2002 passed by this Court, it was, inter alia, directed as

Sudhir Asher and anr. Vs. Vijay Shroff and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 152 and 330;; High Court Original Side Rules - Rule 1;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 482;; Administration of Estates Act, 1925

Reported in : (2000)1CALLT548(HC)

or revoked by any act of the-testator. In fact, the Chapter on ademptlon of legacies in the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is Chapter XVI which pertains only to ademptlon of specific legacies. Thus under section 152 of the Indian … under the will of Dharam Singh Surlaya deceased abovenamed in favour of the defendants, (except the defendant No. 16) is : (I) a specific legacy, or (II) a general legacy, or (III) a demonstrative legacy in the

K.R. Patel (Dead) Through Lrs. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11(1), 160, 168 and 256(1); Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 Sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 29 and 36; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2, 211, 222, 302, 317 and 366; Mussalman Wakf Validating Act, 1913; Official Trustees Act, 1913 - Sections 7(6); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(3), 41 and 176(4); Administrators General Act, 1963

Reported in : AIR1999SC3203; [1999]239ITR738(SC); JT1999(6)SC293; 1999(5)SCALE249; (1999)7SCC26; [1999]Supp2SCR44

trustees as trustees under the terms of the Will as well as under Section 211(1) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. It was also held that the trust was public trust. The trust was registered on December 29, 1964.7. … him in his representative capacity only, and the tax shall, subject to the other provisions contained in this Chapter, be levied upon and recovered from him in like manner and to the same extent as it would … and B.G. Amin were liable to be assessed as trustees under Section 161 of the Income-tax Act, 1961?2. These questions arose from the order of

N.P. Saseendran versus N.P. Ponnamma & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 3 S.C.R. 957

of persons.”(ii) Sadaram Suryanarayana v. Kalla Surya Kantham22 “20. Time now to refer to the provisions of the Succession Act, 1925, Chapter VI whereof deals with construction of wills. Some of the principles of interpretation of wills that are statutorily … to classify the document as a “settlement” - The Judgment of the High Court is confirmed. [Paras 15.1, 16, 18, 21]Gift - Settlement - Interplay between Gift and Settlement: Held: The primary difference between the Gift and

Shakti Yezdani Vs. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the rigour applicable to a will for its making or the test of its validity under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. According to the ruling, S. 109A & S. 109B of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Bye-law 9.11 … meanings dependent on the context within which it operates. “11. . . . . . . In this chapter occur Sections 45 to 48 which provide for the vesting of certain properties in the Trust. Section 45 … provided under S. 109A would not create a third mode of succession. 16.1 The learned counsel submits that the Companies Act has nothing to do