Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: states reorganization act · Page 1 of about 2,243 results (0.033 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 23 2005

Bankimchandra Makanbhai Patel Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-23-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India, Articles 341, 342 and 342(1); States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 8 and 41; ;Bombay Reorganization Act, 1960 - Sections 26 and 27; ;Constitution of India (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950; ;Constitution of India (Scheduled Castes) (Part C States) Order, 1951; Presidential Order, 1950; Presidential (Amendment) Order, 1956; Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1956

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR540; 2006(2)MhLj664

Director (R), Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Konkan Division. It is set out therein that the State Reorganization Act came to be passed in the year 1956 and many States in the Union of India were re-organized

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2007

Hitesh Dasiram Murkute Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-15-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : States Reorganization Act, 1956; Bombay State Reorganization Act, 1960 - Sections 26 and 27; Representations of People Act - Sections 20; Maharashtra Scheduled Caste Certificates Act, 2000 - Sections 18 and 19; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16, 19, 19(1), 21, 341 and 342; Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003 - Rule 5 and 5(1)

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR784; 2007(5)MhLj454

Tribe belonging to one region would continue to get the same benefits despite bifurcation thereof in terms of States' Reorganization Act. With a view to find out as to whether any particular area of the country was required to … followed the decision of the Apex Court in Sudhakar Vitthal, observing that issue of effect of provisions of States Reorganization Act, 1956 and Bombay State Reorganization Act, 1960 was not brought to the notice of the Apex Court. It

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 1958

Textile Mills, Bombay State and ors. Vs. their Employees,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-29-1958

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947 - Sections 22, 22(5) and 38A; Bombay Industrial Relations Act; Evidence Act - Sections 42; States Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 122

Reported in : (1959)ILLJ308Bom

reorganization of States, the Bombay Government, acting in exercise of the powers conferred by S. 122 of the States Reorganization Act, 1956, issued a notification on 1 November 1956 specifying Sri S. H. Naik, member of the industrial court, … Bombay Government on reorganization of the State on 1 November 1956 is perfectly valid. Section 122 of the States Reorganization Act reads as under : 'Power to name authorities, etc., for exercising statutory functions. - The Central Government, as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 19 1958

Joshi W.W. Vs. State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-19-1958

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : State Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 8, 59(2), 87, 88, 116 and 116(1); Constitution of India - Articles 124, 218, 248, 226, 227, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 324; Indian Independence (Rights, Property and Liabilities) Order, 1947 - Article 10; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Sections 9; Bengal Agricultural Incometax Act, 1944; Indian Independence (Legal Proceedings) Order, 1947

Reported in : (1959)IILLJ485Bom

to reorganize the existing States in India, and to provide for it and other matters connected therewith the States Reorganization Act was passed by Parliament. As a result of reorganization, the boundaries of various States changed. Some of the … 324 of Constitution of India and Sections 2, 8, 59 (2), 87, 88, 116 and 116 (1) of States Reorganization Act, 1956 - petition against termination Order by State of Madhya Pradesh before High Court of Nagpur - subsequent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 1966

Dave (L.R.) and ors. Vs. Government of Gujarat (by Secretary, General ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-04-1966

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : States Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 115(1); Allocated Government Servants (Absorption, Seniority, Pay and Allowances) Rules, 1957; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 309 and 311

Reported in : (1967)ILLJ210Guj

a senior clerk was Rs. 75-3-105 E.B.-5-120. The pay-scale of a junior clerk was Rs. 40-3-70. Under the States Reorganization Act 37 of 1956 (here-after called the Act), a new State, among others, called the State of Bombay, came … discharged. No order as to costs. Labour and Industrial - reduction in rank - Section 115 (1) of States Reorganization Act, 1956, Allocated Government Servants (Absorption, Seniority, Pay and Allowances) Rules, 1957 and Articles 14, 309 and 311 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1964

Mehta Amritlal Gokaldas and ors. Vs. the State of Bombay and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-06-1964

Subject : Constitution

Acts : States Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 49, 50, 52, 59(3) and 199; High Court of Judicature Ordinance for State of Saurashtra, 1948 - Schedule - Sections 22 and 22-A (2)

Reported in : AIR1965Guj87; (1964)10GLR769

the Letters Patent jurisidction of the High Court of Bombay for the old State is preserved under the States, Reorganization Act. but, having regard to the provision contained in Section 52 and, as interre5ed by us, there is no … area got extended to non-Bombay area as well. Mr.I.M.Nanavati is unable to point out any provision in the States Reorganization Act, which In express terms, extends the Letters Patent jurisdiction of the High Court of Bombay to the anything

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1970

Syed Abbas HussaIn Nagri Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-17-1970

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 162, 309, 311 and 311(2); States Reorganization Act, 1956 - Sections 115(7), 116 and 119; Civil Services-Hyderabad Cadre and Recruitment Rules, 1955; Hyderabad General Recruitment Rules, 1955 - Rules 2 and 3; ;Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission Regulations 1963 - Regulation 15; ;Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission Rules, 1963 - Rule 4(2); Andra Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules - Rule 8(3); Andhra Pradesh State ad Subordinate Services Rules - Rule 10(5)

Reported in : AIR1971AP1

the questions referred, it is necessary to make a reference to few facts. Before the enforcement of the States Reorganization Act, 1956. the State of Hyderabad conceited of three regions; Telangana. Marathwada and Karataka. By virtue of section 3(1) … State of Hyderabad conceited of three regions; Telangana. Marathwada and Karataka. By virtue of section 3(1) of the States Reorganization Act, certain territories of theorist while State of Hyderabad were added to the State of Andhra and State of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1958

Surjuprasad Dwarkaprasad Gumashta Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-23-1958

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : States Reorganization Act - Sections 59 and 64; Constitution of India - Article 226; Payment of Wages Act

Reported in : (1959)ILLJ572Bom

Chagla, C.J.1. A very interesting question arises with regard to the proper construction of S. 59 of the States Reorganization Act, and the question arises under the following circumstances. A petition was filed by one Surjuprasad Gumashta against the … presented before the Nagpur High Court and the petition was admitted by that High Court. Then came the States Reorganization Act and this petition was transferred to the Bombay High Court under Sub-section (2) of S. 59. The petition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1976

State of Mysore and anr. Vs. H. Srinivasmurthy

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-29-1976

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; States Reorganization Act - Sections 115(7)

Reported in : AIR1976SC1104; 1976LabIC764; (1976)IILLJ311SC; (1976)1SCC817; [1976]3SCR255

Assistant Engineers with retrospective effect from 1st November 1956, when the new State of Mysore emerged under the States Reorganization Act. The petitioners therein filed a writ petition praying for the issue of mandamus directing the State to fix … Service - discrimination - Articles 14, 16 and 226 of Constitution of India and Section 115 (7) of States Reorganization Act - respondent being Instructor of Tailoring sent on deputation - filed writ challenging action of appellants who absorbed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2005

Kapila Hingorani Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-13-2005

Subject : Constitution Company

Acts : States Reorganization Act - Sections 65; Companies Act; Constitution of India - Article 21; Electricity (Supply) Act - Sections 79

Reported in : AIR2005SC980; [2005(104)FLR869]; JT2005(1)SC440; (2005)IILLJ232SC; (2005)2SCC262; 2005(2)SLJ417(SC); (2005)2UPLBEC1490

These applications are disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Put up the matter after six months. Constitution - States Reorganization Act - Section 65 - Companies Act - Constitution of India - Article 21 - Electricity (Supply) Act - … the directions issued by this Court, the Central Government has exercised its jurisdiction under Section 65 of the States Reorganization Act.10. Union of India has filed an affidavit wherein it has been contended that winding up applications have already

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial