Advanced Search Results

State of Madhya Pradesh and anr. Vs. Firm Gobardhan Dass Kailash Nath

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : State Forest Contract Rules - Rule 30(3)

Reported in : AIR1973SC1164; (1973)1SCC668

land revenue, purporting to do so under Section 82 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and the Rewa State Forest Contract Rules, 1935 relating to such tenders.5. The respondent firm thereupon filed two writ petitions in the High Court raising … to do so under Section 82 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and the Rewa State Forest Contract Rules, 1935 relating to such tenders.5. The respondent firm thereupon filed two writ petitions in the High Court raising … arrears of land revenue under Section 82 of the Act and Rule 30(3)(b) of the said Rules. On this reasoning, the High Court allowed the

K. Sreedhara Reddy Vs. the Conservator of Forests and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contract

Acts : Hyderabad Forest Act - Sections 1355F; Forest Contract Rules - Rules 29, 29(3), 30 and 30(3)

Reported in : AIR1976SC782; (1976)1SCC107; [1976]1SCR770; 1975(7)LC798(SC)

on account of the illicit cutting and the other was a penalty imposed under Rule 29 of the Forest Contract Rules (for short the rules issued in exercise of the powers conferred under Sections 44 and 79 of the … together resulting in a sum of Rs. 23,088.00. Eventually, the contract was terminated on December 28, 1960 under Rule 30 of Rules. Long later, in January 1962, the amount stated above was sought to be realised by revenue … number permitted number under two contracts entered into by him with the State of Andhra Pradesh, was directed by the Conservator of Forests-the first respondent-to … the penalty. The revenue authorities as well as the forest authorities adopt the various steps prescribed in Rule 30(3) for realisation of the sum. In the present case it was the Tahsildar who sought to realise the

Conservator of Forests Nizamabad Circle, Nizamabad and ors. Vs. K. Sri ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Telengana Area) Forest Contract Rules - Rules 15, 15(1), 29(1), 29(2), 29(3), 30, 30(3), 31(1) and 31(3); ;Andhra Pradesh (Telengana Area) Forest Act, 1355F - Sections 29 and 81; Indian Contract Act, 1972 - Sections 74; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1968AP198

(d) The Government shall be entitled to collect the amount of penalty as arrears of land revenue, vide Rule 30 (3) (c). (ii) If it is not proposed to terminate the contract on account of a breach of condition … stating as follows:-- 'The Conservator of Forests levied the following penalties ......... as per Section 29 of the Forest Contract Rules ............ ...... Please pay the amount within a week ................' 7. Similarly, the Conservator passed another order making … being Rs. 200 alone would be collected, such authority could haw clearly stated so but the actual wording of Rule 31 supports the contention on

Firm Gobardhan Das Kailasnath Vs. Collector of Mirzapur

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 54; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 82; ;Rewa Forest Contract Rules - Rule 30; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1956All721

as arrears of land revenue under Section 82, Indian Forest Act read with Rule 30 of the Rewa Forest Contract Rules.5. The learned Single Judge accepted the contentions raised on behalf of the respondent and by a common judgment … learned single Judge of this Court upon petitions presented under Article 226 of the Constitution. The facts briefly stated are these.2. The Chief Conservator of Forests, Vindhya Pradesh invited sealed tenders for the sale of lac and … The appellant firm which carries on business at Mirzapur submitted tenders on 31-1-1952. The tenders were opened the same day and the appellant's tenders were

Gurusiddappa Nurandappa UppIn and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 - Sections 98A; Karnataka Forest (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : ILR1981KAR751; [1982]49STC192(Kar)

Court in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Orient Paper Mills Ltd. : [1977]2SCR149 . He submitted that the forest contract which was the subject-matter of interpretation in the above said decision was of similar nature and under those … Government were not sales, the learned counsel for the petitioners relied on rule 89 of the Karnataka Forest Rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'), as also on the terms and conditions incorporated in the contract. … the balance of the consideration which was payable after 24th December, 1975. 3. Shri S. S. Ujjannavar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in … that the revenue authorities fell into the error of interpreting Notification No. 30/60 by confining exemption to steel ingots in which 'entirely, exclusively or only'

Badri Prasad Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Forest Contract Rules - Rules 1, 5, 8, 18, 18(2), 18(3), 19(3), 20, 20(2), 32 and 102A; Forest Contract Act - Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4; Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 25(1); Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 83 and 83(1); Sale of Goods Act - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1966SC58; [1965]3SCR381

purposes tothe agriculturists and the residents of the villages till three months beforethe expiry of the contract. The Forest Contract Rules were deemed to be part ofthe contract entered into between respondent No. 2 and the State, by Clause … agriculturists and the residents of the villages till three months beforethe expiry of the contract. The Forest Contract Rules were deemed to be part ofthe contract entered into between respondent No. 2 and the State, by Clause … Prasad signed this certificate as a witness. The workcould continue upto June 30, 1958.5. Interest was to be charged at 6 1/4 per cent per … Prasad signed this certificate as a witness. The workcould continue upto June 30, 1958.5. Interest was to be charged at 6 1/4 per cent per

Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Madras Vs. Smt. R.A. Muthukrishna Ammal an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2 and 4; Wealth Tax (Amendment) Act, 1964

Reported in : AIR1969SC740; [1969]72ITR801(SC); [1969]2SCR1

K.N. Sharma, J.1. The present respondent who is an approved contractor of the Jammu & Kashmir State Forest Corporation (appellant before us) filed an application under Sections 8, 11 and 20 of the Jammu & Kashmir … K.N. Sharma, J.1. The present respondent who is an approved contractor of the Jammu & Kashmir State Forest Corporation (appellant before us) filed an application under Sections 8, 11 … powers of Court-Subject to the main provisions of this Act and of rules made thereunder-(a)...(b) the Court shall have, for the purpose of, and in … powers of Court-Subject to the main provisions of this Act and of rules made thereunder-(a)...(b) the Court shall have, for the purpose of, and in … present case the achievement of the petitioner was 300% and under such circumstances the petitioner had all … present case the achievement of the petitioner was 300% and under such circumstances the petitioner had all

Rudraiah Raju Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 162 and 226; ;Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 - Sections 13 and 26; ;Karnataka Excise (Bottling of Liquor) Rules, 1967 - Rule 3

Reported in : ILR1986KAR587

challenged the legality of an order of the State Government under which contract for bottling Arrack was granted to respondents 3 to 10 on the … are not interested in challenging the decision.(iii) Similarly take a case in which felling of trees in a State forest is prohibited by law except under specified circumstances and subject to specified conditions and under the permission granted … Bangalore, Dated : 6th Nov. 1984To :The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore.Sir,Sub : Amendment to Rule 30 of Sub-rule 13 of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules 1968 and to Rule 3,

Shanti Steels Through Its Proprietor, Amar Kumar Agrawal Son of Shri S ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(1), 19(1), 21, 226 and 227

Food Corporation of India v. SEIL Limited and Anr. reported in : (2008) 3 SCC 440 and Karnataka State Forest Industries Corporation and Anr. v. Indian Rocks and Anr. reported in : (2009) 1 SCC 150. The interference … he can seek extension of maximum of further 30 days time, and that too on payment of … Railways could have given the delivery of the stolen goods, had the petitioner performed his obligation under the contract?8. In short the Railways contend that the petitioners cannot agitate refund of money much less with interest in … and consider the validity of provision of an Act or regulation or rules as violative of Articles 14, 16(1), 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution, … to entertain a writ petition in all cases as a matter of rule.(c) A writ petition involving a consequential relief of monetary claim is also

Chief Conservator of Forests and ors. Vs. Rattan Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contract

Acts : Central Provinces and Berar Forest Contract Rules - Rules 15 and 15(1)

Reported in : AIR1967SC166; 1966MhLJ905(SC); [1966]SuppSCR158

compensation and penalty and restraining enforcement of the order. The High Court granted the petition and restrained the State and the forest authorities from recovering Rs. 9,000, ordered on January 30, 1958, from the respondent. 2. In … order dated January 30, 1958 directed the respondent in exercise of the authority under r. 15(1) of the Forest Contract Rules framed by the Government of Central Provinces & Berar, to pay Rs. 8,500 as compensation assessed by him … in exercise of the authority under r. 15(1) of the Forest Contract Rules framed by the Government of Central Provinces & Berar, to pay Rs. … District of Madhya Pradesh, for the period October 14, 1956 to March 31, 1958. The Divisional Forest Officer held an enquiry in respect of certain