Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: stamps act sections 56 1 · Page 1 of about 2,760 results (0.080 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 06 1983

The State of Rajasthan Vs. Maharaja Shri Karni Singhji and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-06-1983

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 26, 47A, 47A(2), 56 and 56(1) - Schedule - Article 23; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1983Raj90; 1983()WLN4

Sub-Section (3), so was not an appealable order.;(b) Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1952 Sections 47A & 56 - Order appealable Under Section 47A cannot be agitated … dated September 6, 1971 (Ex. 6) as being without jurisdiction.2. The present writ petition relates to the Rajasthan Stamp Law (Adaptation) Act, 1952 (Act No. VII of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').3. I may advert … Bench, in para 13 observed as under:--'On a review of these authorities, we are of opinion that Section 56(1) gives powers to the Board to interfere with the orders of the Collector passed under chapters IV and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1989

Maheshwar Dayal Vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Member, Board ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-27-1989

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 56(1)

Reported in : AIR1989All206

nyayaiaya Civil Judge, Sitapur se mool award mangaya jaye. Usme varnit sampatti ka mutyankan karaya jaye. Tadanusar kami stamps evam penalty ka nirdharan kiya jaye. Patrawali 3-8-83 ko prastut ho.' 4. Aggrieved by the order of the … a reference after registration. Since the document was impounding u/s, 33(1), only Sections 35, 37, 38, 40 and 42 can apply and not even Section … represented by opposite party No. 4 in the present writ petition, had filed a revision petition under Section 56(1) of the Indian Stamp Act which was allowed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority through his judgment dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 1988

P. Balakrishnan and ors. Vs. the District Registrar, Tuticorin, Tirune ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-20-1988

Subject : Property

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 27, 40, 56(1) and 64 - Schedule - Article 45; Transfer of Property Act

Reported in : AIR1989Mad257

ofthe District Registrar, Palayamkottai,Tirunelveli District relating to receipts understamps and registration fees, felt that therewas short levy of stamp duty and registrationfees in respect of documents Nos. 414 and415 of 1974. According to him, in terms ofS.O. … 1957 AP 237 in para 9 as follows : -- '..... These sections are part of an integral scheme for ascertaining the quantum of stamp … amount as demanded by the District Registrar. The petitioners wanted to approach the Board of Revenue under Section 56(1) of the Indian Stamp Act. But the petitioners were informed that with the abolition of the Board of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 16 1985

Chandrahasji Maharaj Vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority I.E. Boar ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-16-1985

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 9(1), 33, 56, 57 and 57(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(10); Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1986MP132

and a report being made by the respondent No. 4 to the respondent No. 3 the Collector of Stamps, Indore to the effect that the sale deed was not exempt from stamp duty and further that the … Controlling Revenue Authority may state any case referred to it under Section 56, Sub-section (2) or otherwise coming to its notice, and refer such case, … ORDERK.L. Srivastava, J. 1. This petition dt. 13-1-1983 under Articles. 226 and … known as 'Bhartiya Grih Nirrnan Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Indore (respondent No. 5) registered under the M.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. He sold 10.16 acres of his land to the said Sanstha by a registered sale deed dt. … by the said order, the petitioner filed an application (Ann. B) under Section 57 of the Stamp Act, before the Revenue Commissioner, Indore (respondent No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1971

The Secretary to Government Vs. the Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. (Wvg.) Co. ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-22-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 - Sections 31, 54, 55, 55(1), 57 and 57(2); Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 56, 57 and 59; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1973Ker69

a 'security bond', whether the Government have power to grant the refund of the value of the excess stamps to the party.'3. We must mention that, since the matter could not wait, the Bank had meanwhile, on … of the Kerala Stamp Act (hereinafter referred to as the Kerala Act) which are in pan materia with Sections 56, 57 and 59 respectively of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as the Central Act). These … Raman Nayar, C.J.1. On the 25th May, 1967, the United Commercial Bank, Mavoor (for short, the Bank) executed what has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 1963

Annamalai and Co., Pte. Ltd. Vs. District Registrar, Madras and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-08-1963

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act - Sections 31, 40, 41, 56, 56(1), 56(2) and 57 - Schedule - Article 48; Transfer of Property Act; Madras Stamp Act

Reported in : AIR1966Mad36; (1965)1MLJ431

the petitioner on 13-8-1957, the bank was authorised to sell the immovable properties. The document was stamped with stamps of the value of Rs. 11-4-0. On presentation of the power-of-attorney for registration, the Joint Sub Registrar called … instead of helping the appellant, go against his contention. In those two sections this power is given when the referring authority has a doubt to … of Rs. 6954-60 and Rs. 10 were demanded.(3) The petitioner thereafter moved the Board of Revenue under S. 56(1) of the Act. The Board of Revenue ordered stay of collection of stamp duty and penalty and posted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1970

Board of Revenue, U.P., Allahabad Vs. Saraya Sugar Factory, Gorakhpur

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-01-1970

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 33, 56(1), 56(2), 57(1) and 58

Reported in : AIR1971All70

plea of the Company that the Collector had no jurisdiction to take proceedings under Section 23 of the Stamps Act because the document was not 'produced' before him within the meaning of that provision. Another question related to … and made an order dated March 9, 1960, for payment of the deficit duty.3. The Company applied under Sections 56 and 57 of the Act to the Board of Revenue, U.P., as the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, praying … Pathak, J.1. On October 29, 1957, the Saraya Sugar Factory, a partnership firm, executed a sale deed in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1994

Jagdish NaraIn Vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-25-1994

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 1, 47A, 48 and 56; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1994All371

ORDER1. The petitioner filed a revision under Section 56 of the Indian Stamp Act before the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority challenging an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner (Stamps), respondent No. … ORDER1. The petitioner filed a revision under Section 56 of the Indian Stamp Act before the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority challenging an order passed by the … amount in dispute be stayed. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, respondent No. 1 vide its order dated 3-2-1994, while admitting the revision for hearing, granted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1968

Ama Stores Represented by Its Partner M.T.M. Abubacker Vs. Collector o ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-29-1968

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 56(1), 56(2) and 57; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1970Mad148

place. Hence he pleaded that it would suffice, for the purpose of paying the appropriate court-fee under the Stamp Manual, if the document was stamped as an agreement, for which the duty payable is Rs. 2 1/4. … was stamped as an agreement, for which the duty payable is Rs. 2 1/4. This was the duty actually paid on, the document, viz., Rs. 2 1/4. The petitioner had to bring this agreement before the Registrar … as the Chief Controlling Revenue authority, has got certain powers conferred under Section 56(2) of the Act. It was this power that was invoked by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2001

J.H.V. Sugar Corporation Ltd. Vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-27-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 13, 14, 26, 31. 33, 35, 37, 38(2), 40(1), (2), (4), (5), 41, 42(1), 45(2), 47A(1), (4), 57A, 56(1), 59, 60 and 61; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 to 128 and 145 to 148; Uttar Pradesh Act, 1992; Indian Registration Act, 1908

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1170; (2001)2UPLBEC1140

an order passed by the Collector of the district under the provisions of Chapter IV of the Indian Stamps Act (Act No. 2 of 1899) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is maintainable before the Chief Controlling Revenue … Tribunal empowered to act and function as a quasi judicial authority in the exercise of its powers under Sections 56 and 57 of the Act, but not a Court having inherent jurisdiction. The powers of the Board to … of Chapter IV of the Indian Stamps Act (Act No. 2 of 1899) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is maintainable before the Chief Controlling

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial