Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: stamp act 1899 sections 2 11 · Page 1 of about 1,545 results (0.087 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 03 1989

MukarramuddIn Vs. RahimuddIn and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-03-1989

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(11)

Reported in : 1990(18)DRJ11

parties and Mr. Maheshwar Dayal, learned standing Counsel of Delhi Administration.(3) Under the provisions of Section 2(11) of Stamp Act, 1899 an award by an arbitrator directing a partition, is also an instrument of partition Section 2(15) reads as … counsel for the parties and Mr. Maheshwar Dayal, learned standing Counsel of Delhi Administration.(3) Under the provisions of Section 2(11) of Stamp Act, 1899 an award by an arbitrator directing a partition, is also an instrument of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2012

Shiva Sahakari Up Jal Sinchan Sanstha Ltd. Vs. the Nanded District Cen ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jul-25-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

made absolute on above terms. Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 - Section 33 - Stamp Act, 1899 - Section 2, 11, 35(a) - Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 4 - Cases Referred: 1. M/s. Wolstenholme International Ltd. vs. … no provision for impounding the promissory notes for payment of stamp duty. On the contrary, as per Indian Stamp Act, 1899, there is prohibition in respect of admissibility of bill of exchange or promissory notes, which are not duly … The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 then filed Dispute NO. CC/156/2005 under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, for recovery of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1979

Saudagar Singh and ors. Vs. Gurdip Singh Gill and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-16-1979

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Stamps Act, 1899 - Sections 2, 11, 14, 18, 35 and 62

Reported in : (1979)81PLR515

a genuine document.13. The second submission of Mr. Majithia has also no force. Mr. Majithia, after referring to Sections 2, 11, 14, 18, 35 and 62 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, has argued that the proxy sent by … had been properly stamped within three months of their receipt in India under Section 18 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. If they were stamped within three months of the receipt in India, they were valid. He did not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 25 2012

Shiva Sahakari Up Jal Sinchan Sanstha Ltd. Vs. the Nanded District Cen ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jul-25-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court has committed error of law while applying the provisions of Section 11 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and wrongly held that, promissory note … no provision for impounding the promissory notes for payment of stamp duty. On the contrary, as per Indian Stamp Act, 1899, there is prohibition in respect of admissibility of bill of exchange or promissory notes, which are not duly … arose about the repayment of loan. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 then filed Dispute NO. CC/156/2005 under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, for recovery of the loan amount. In the said Dispute,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1991

Media Anasuyamma and Another Vs. Choppela Lakshmamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-29-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(6), (11), (12), (16) and (24), 3, 33(2), 46; Andhra Pradesh Stamp (Amendment) Act, 1986 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 10, 11 and 115; General Stamp Act, 1869; Indian Stamp Act, 1879 - Sections 3(5) and (10), 34, 37 and 46

Reported in : AIR1992AP183; 1991(1)ALT430

decree and Judgment. The C.R.P. is disposed of accordingly. No costs.21. Order accordingly. Civil - relevant date - Sections 2 (6), 2 (11), 2 (12) and 3 of Stamp Act, 1899 (as amended by A.P. Act, 1986) and … contended that every document is liable to a stamp duty in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, as in force on the date of execution of the document irrespective of the date of presentation or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 1991

Mathrubhumi Printing and Publishing Co. Ltd. Vs. Vardhaman Publishers ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-28-1991

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 31, 108, 155, 397, 398 and 399 - Schedule - Article 22; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(11), 12 and 63

Reported in : [1992]73CompCas80(Ker)

Sections 31, 108, 155, 397, 398 and 399 and Article 22 of Schedule to Companies Act, 1956 and Sections 2, 12 and 63 of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - question relating to power of company to alter its … Table A of Schedule I to the Act and Section 2(11), Section 12, Section 63 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (for short 'the Stamp Act'). We shall now reproduce the provisions, leaving out the parts which are not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2005

Paladugu Venu Vs. Vakkavanthula Srujana

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-02-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(6), 2(11), 2(14), 2(4), 3, 33, 35, 36, 38, and 38(2)

Reported in : 2005(6)ALT819

inasmuch as even an unstamped document can be impounded under the provisions of Section 38 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (for short 'the Stamp Act') through the Collector, the Court below committed an error in not sending the … duty'. Chapter IV of the Stamp Act deals with 'instruments not duly stamped'. The word 'instrument' appearing in Sections 33, 35 and 36 of the Stamp Act, means instrument with duty, irrespective of the fact whether such … the Junior Civil Judge, Kodad, dismissing the application in I.A.No. 609 of 2004 in O.S.No. 184 of 2004, filed by the petitioner for sending the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1990

Vardhaman Publishers Limited, Vs. Mathrubhumi Printing and Publishing ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-27-1990

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 26 to 30, 31(2), 80(2), 108, 173 and 173(2); Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(11) and 12(2)

Reported in : [1991]71CompCas1(Ker)

Matched in: Advocate G. Ramaswamy,; M. Pathrose Mathai,; M. Ramanatha Pillai C.M. Dewan, Adv. for Respondent No. 1,; N. Subramonian, Adv. for Respondents Nos. 2 to 11,;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2009

Ashok Kamal Capital Builders Vs. State and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-27-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Stamps Act, 1899 - Schedule IA: Articles 13 and 23 - Sections 2(6), 2(11), 2(14), 25, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35, 36, 40, 48, 48B, 61, 62, 64, 70 and 73; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63; Indian Penal Code; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Stamp (Madhya Pradesh) Act, 1990; Indian Stamp (Orissa Second Amendment) Act, 1986; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 162(2009)DLT396

it is not an instrument chargeable with duty. under Section 33 or any other provision of the Indian Stamp Act 1899 and cannot be impounded under Section 33.2. Without prejudice to the above, it is submitted that we are … Act, for short) and therefore the petitioners should be asked to pay deficient stamp duty and penalty under Sections 33 and 35 of the Act and show cause why penal action should not be taken against them … of Bihar v. Karamchand Thapar and Bros. Ltd. : AIR 1962 SC 110 and it was opined:6. It is next contended that as the copy

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2023

Phoenix Arc Private Limited vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-07-2023

in the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and the Kerala Stamp Act, 1959.11. For convenience of analysis, the relevant Sections and Articles in the Kerala Stamp Act and Indian Stamp Act are extracted below:- ..12.. The Kerala Stamp … the Sub Registrar that in view of Section 5(1A) of the SARFAESI Act and 8F of the Indian Stamp Act,1899, no stamp duty is payable to assignment deeds. Respondent No.5 referred the matter to respondent No.3, the District … ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA, WP(C) NO. 19371 OF 2017 PETITIONER/S:PHOENIX ARC PRIVATE LIMITED

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial