Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: staff service rules 1980 · Page 1 of about 3,811 results (0.108 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 28 1993

Bhabani Prasad Dash Vs. Arbitrator-cum-director of Textiles and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-28-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Staff Service Rules, 1980

Reported in : 76(1993)CLT149; (1994)ILLJ559Ori

April 6, 1993 and on knowing that the maximum period of probation provided by Rule 12 of the Staff Service Rules, 1980, which is 24 months, had expired by the time the termination order was issued, a need was felt … of the present case are entirely different inasmuch as even the maximum period of probation visualised by the Staff Service Rules, 1980 had expired by December 19, 1988, and so, the case squarely attracts the ratio of the three decisions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1998

Umesh Chand Bhilwar Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-17-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 - Sections 30; Prathma Bank (Staff) Service Regulations, 1980 - Regulations 8, 8(1), (2) and (3), 9 and 10, 10(2), 17(1) and 30; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 29; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Employees Service Regulations, 1975 - Rules 5 and 6; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Sugar Factories Federation Service Rules, 1976; Indian Police Service (Probation) Rules, 1954

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC943; (1999)IILLJ1093All; (1999)1UPLBEC27

purpose of giving effect to the provisions of the Act. In exercise of the aforesaid powers Prathma Bank (Staff) Service Regulations, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations) were made by the Board of Directors of respondent No. … the absence of any Indication to the contrary in the original order of appointment or promotion or the service rules. In such a case, an express order of confirmation is necessary to give the employee a substantive right

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1999

Ramesh Chandra Rajpoot Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-22-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh District Offices (Collectorates) Ministerial Service Rules, 1980 - Rule 5; Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1975 - Rules 4, 6, 7, 10 and 12; Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission Rules, 1998 - Rule 4, 4(1) and 5; Collectorate Ministerial Offices Service Rules, 1980 - Rule 5; Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1985; Uttar Pradesh Procedure for Direct Recruitment for Group 'C' Posts (outside the Purview of the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission) Rules, 1998 - Rule 2 and 5; Collection Amins Rules, 1974;

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1417

as to whether the cadre of Junior Clerk as visualised by the U. P. District Offices (Collectorate) Ministerial Service Rules, 1980, is the same as that of Assistant Vasil Baqi Navis. In view of the nature of controversy raised … by direct recruitment and promotion of Group 'D' employees in accordance with the provisions of Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1975, as amended from time to time. The term 'Ministerial Staff' as defined in Rule

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 23 2005

Birendra Kumar Roy Vs. Managing Director, the Orissa State Co-operativ ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Dec-23-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Orissa Co-operative Societies Act - Sections 33; Cadre Rules; Staff Service Rules, 1980

Reported in : 2006(I)OLR161

the purpose of retirement or any other benefits given or likely to be given. Accordingly, the provision of Staff Service Rule, 1980, in Clause 2(f) be amended and the rules in Annexure-G relating to the common cadre of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 2005

Ram Chander Jaiswal Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-12-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation Department, Ministerial and Drawing Staff Services Rules, 1980 - Rules 4, 5, 5(A)(8) and 21; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 309

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC755; 2005(3)ESC2016

Annexure 2.2. The petitioner is a Stenographer in the office of the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Faizabad. The services of the petitioner are governed by the U.P. Consolidation Department, Ministerial and Drawing Staff Services Rules, 1980 (hereinafter … Faizabad. The services of the petitioner are governed by the U.P. Consolidation Department, Ministerial and Drawing Staff Services Rules, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules'). Earlier the petitioner was transferred from Faizabad to Ballia on administrative ground

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2001

Kumud Ranjan and anr., Etc. Etc. Vs. Munger Kshetriya GramIn Bank and ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jun-20-2001

Subject : Service

therefore, appropriate to separately state their . case. According to them, in terms of Clause 13 of the Staff Service Regulations, 1980 seniority in a particular grade or scale is reckoned with reference to the date of appointment … Gramin Bank and involves the interpretation of the 'seniority-cum merit' rule in the context of the circulars and rules governing such promotion.2. There are two petitioners in CWJC No 5886/87 and one each in CWJC No. 26/

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2002

Board of Directors, Sri Visakha Grameena Bank and ors. Vs. Upadrista R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-19-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Sri Visakha Grameena Bank Staff Service Rules, 1980 - Rules 17, 19 and 30(1); ;Sri Visakha Grameena Bank Staff Service Regulation, 1980 - Regulations 17, 19, 27, 30 and 30 (1)(F)

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD754; 2003(1)ALT17; (2003)ILLJ1139AP

and diligence, which is in violation of Rule Nos. 17, 19 and 30(1) of Sri Visakha Grameena Bank Staff Service Regulations, 1980 by which you are governed.You are hereby directed to submit a written statement of defence, if … evidence adduced by the management of the bank and since we do not find any infraction of procedural rules in conducting the departmental enquiry against the petitioner, there is no scope to interfere with the disciplinary measure

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2002

St. Catherine Girls' High School, represented through Its Secretary of ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : May-16-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 30, 31, 226 and 227; Orissa Education Code; Orissa Education Rules; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : 94(2002)CLT524

was decided to release the funds in favour of In-Charge-Headmistress of the School forpayment of salary to the staff until further orders. By letter No. 9260 dated March 9, 1999 (Annexure-12), the Deputy Director of the Secondary … approval was given by the Inspector of Schools on October 10, 1980. Orissa Education (Management of Private Schools) Rules, 1980 (hereinafterreferred to as 'Private Management Rules, 1980') were framed in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) … rights under Article 30(1) of the Constitution. Department of Education and Youth Services, Government of Orissa, issued letter No. 40296-EYS dated November 11, 1982 to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1995

The State Bank of India and anr. Vs. H.K. Dogra and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-24-1995

Subject : Service

Acts : State Bank of India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules - Rule 50(4)

Reported in : (1995)110PLR698

you.2. In accordance with the provisions of the erstwhile Rule 50(3) of the State Bank of India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules, the matter was placed before the Local Board at its meeting held on 29th April, 1980 when after

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2002

Smt. Anju Tewari Vs. District Magistrate/Collector, Etawah

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-16-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh District Offices (Collectorates) Ministerial Service Rules, 1980 - Rules 5 and 8; Subordinate Offices of Ministerial Staff (Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1975 - Rule 12; Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants (Dying-in-Harness) Rules, 1974 - Rules 4, 5 and 5(1)

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1532; [2002(93)FLR690]; (2002)2UPLBEC1093

on the post of clerk-copy 1st is made in accordance with the Uttar Pradesh District Offices (Collectorates) Ministerial Service Rules, 1980. Rule 5 refers to various categories of post, which includes post of Copyist as well as post of … must possess the following qualifications :PostQualification1. For the posts in Category 'A'As prescribed In the Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (Director Recruitment) Rules. 1975 :Provided thatin the case of the post of typist a candidate must also possess

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial