Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: specific relief act 1963 sections 6 · Page 1 of about 10,792 results (0.165 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 23 1989

M/S. Ansal Properties and Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dr. Anand Nath and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-23-1989

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 6, Rule 17; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19 and 22

Reported in : AIR1990Delhi151

Civil - amendment - Section 151 and Order 6 Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Sections 19 and 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 - applications under Order 6 Rule 17 with Section 151 … legitimacy of any children.10. Mr. A. K. Jain seeks to call in aid of Section 19(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, for the purpose of saying that the question of widowhood, or question of legitimacy of children of Dr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2007

Sh. Deep Chand Vs. Sh. Kulanand Lakhera and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2007

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 9; Land Tenancy Act; Madras Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955; Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955; Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 86A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145, 145(1) and 146(1)

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT765; 2007(95)DRJ683

to the thief and recover the same as per a recognized legal procedure. 18. Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 is a statutory recognition of possessory suits as distinct from proprietary suits. It reads as under:6. Suit by … must restore it even to the thief and recover the same as per a recognized legal procedure. 18. Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 is a statutory recognition of possessory suits as distinct from proprietary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 1980

Chandra and Co. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-12-1980

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6 and 6(2); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 9; Limitation Act, 1859 - Sections 15 and 17; Constitution of India - Article 226;Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 - Sections 91; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1981Raj217

and to dispossess a person in actual possession without having recourse to a Court. Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 (Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877) empowers a person who has been dispossessed without his consent … & Co., was that of a tenant by virtue of the principle of holding over as envisaged under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act and that M/s. Anandraj and Co., could not be regarded as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 28 1995

Nagar Palika, Jind Vs. Jagat Singh, Advocate

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-28-1995

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 6 and 9

Reported in : AIR1995SC1377; 1995(43)BLJR886; JT1995(3)SC281; (1995)111PLR225; 1995(2)SCALE512; (1995)3SCC426; [1995]3SCR9; 1995(2)LC241(SC)

should be treated as a suit based on possession and dispossession in terms of Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. (Once a suit has been filed by the respondent claiming to be the owner and being in possession … behalf of the respondent, should be treated as a suit based on possession and dispossession in terms of Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. (Once a suit has been filed by the respondent claiming to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2004

Sudhir Jaggi and anr. Vs. Sunil Akash Sinha Choudhury and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-11-2004

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 9

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD93(SC); 2004(3)AWC2729(SC); JT2004(6)SC336; (2005)1MLJ19(SC); 2005(I)OLR(SC)370; 2004(6)SCALE580; (2004)7SCC515

suit filed on 12.3.1979 was within the period of six months as prescribed by section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The learned Single Judge further found that there was no evidence of agreement between the developer and defendants … 10.2.1979 and, therefore, the suit filed on 12.3.1979 was within the period of six months as prescribed by section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The learned Single Judge further found that there was no evidence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1999

S. Thiagarajan Vs. Saraswathy Kittu and 6 Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-10-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 41, 122, 123 and 126; Specific Relief Act, 1963 -- Sections 34; Specific Relief Act, 1877 -- Sections 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 6, Rul3 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 145 and 146

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC217

to grant the declaration as prayed for is taken away by the proviso to section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Therefore in view of the finding rendered by the learned trial Judge … throughout. The cross objections deserve acceptance and they stand allowed with costs throughout. (i) Property - title - Sections 41, 122, 123 and 126 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, … the second defendants from alienating the suit property; restraining defendants 3, 4, 6 and 7 from paying the rent to defendants 1 and 2 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1970

Atmaram Panduji Tidke Vs. Prabhawatibai Dattatraya Pakode and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-07-1970

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 36, 100, 100(2), 100(12), 120, 124, 125 and 145; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145, 145(4) and 145(6); Tenancy Laws; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code - Sections 250 and 257

Reported in : AIR1971Bom148; (1971)73BOMLR470; 1970MhLJ805

of the applicant, it is necessary to consider the scope of a suit under S. 6 of the Specific Relief Act. 1963. It is a suit by a person dispossessed of immovable property within a period of six months prior … was attempting to take forcible possession of it from her. On 2-8-1966 she instituted proceedings against Atmaram under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. On 16th November 1966 as a result of inquiry under Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2008

Shri Sadashiv Shyama Sawant (Smt. Satyabhama Sadashiv Sawant and ors.) ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-28-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6, 9 and 6(1); General Clauses Act - Sections 3

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR1114; 2008(5)MhLj279

state in brief, the plaintiff-respondent filed Regular Civil Suit No. 11 of 1989 under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for possession of the suit property on the ground that the contesting defendants had forcibly taken possession of … some of them.2. To state in brief, the plaintiff-respondent filed Regular Civil Suit No. 11 of 1989 under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for possession of the suit property on the ground that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1994

Hawabai Wd/O Late Suleman Haji Vs. Abdul Sattar Suleman Haji Ahmed Oom ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-06-1994

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6(2); Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 15(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Articles 64 and 65; Constitution of India - Article 372(1)

Reported in : 1995(2)BomCR551

Counsel for the respondents contended that no appeal is provided against an order under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and, therefore, the present appeal is not maintainable. On the other hand, the learned Counsel for the appellant … on the question of maintainability of the Appeal.3. The Appellant-plaintiff filed the suit in the trial Court under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act for possession of the suit property on the allegation that the defendants

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2002

Pratapsing Ganpatrao Kadam Vs. Maruti Raghunath Todkar (through L.R's. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-26-2002

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14 and 29(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR2003Bom11

from the date of dispossession. Considering that the issue is whether the suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 can be filed beyond the period of six months set out in Section 6 of the Specific Relief … prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by any special law or local law, the provisions contained in Sections 4 to 24 (inclusive) shall apply only insofar as, and to the extent to which, they are not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial