Advanced Search Results
M/S. Ansal Properties and Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dr. Anand Nath and ...
Delhi
Nov-23-1989
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 6, Rule 17; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19 and 22
AIR1990Delhi151
Civil - amendment - Section 151 and Order 6 Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Sections 19 and 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 - applications under Order 6 Rule 17 with Section 151 … legitimacy of any children.10. Mr. A. K. Jain seeks to call in aid of Section 19(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, for the purpose of saying that the question of widowhood, or question of legitimacy of children of Dr.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandra and Co. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Nov-12-1980
Property
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6 and 6(2); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 9; Limitation Act, 1859 - Sections 15 and 17; Constitution of India - Article 226;Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 - Sections 91; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1956
AIR1981Raj217
and to dispossess a person in actual possession without having recourse to a Court. Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 (Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877) empowers a person who has been dispossessed without his consent … & Co., was that of a tenant by virtue of the principle of holding over as envisaged under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act and that M/s. Anandraj and Co., could not be regarded as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSh. Deep Chand Vs. Sh. Kulanand Lakhera and ors.
Delhi
Apr-17-2007
Tenancy
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 9; Land Tenancy Act; Madras Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955; Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955; Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 86A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145, 145(1) and 146(1)
140(2007)DLT765; 2007(95)DRJ683
to the thief and recover the same as per a recognized legal procedure. 18. Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 is a statutory recognition of possessory suits as distinct from proprietary suits. It reads as under:6. Suit by … must restore it even to the thief and recover the same as per a recognized legal procedure. 18. Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 is a statutory recognition of possessory suits as distinct from proprietary
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Atmaram Panduji Tidke Vs. Prabhawatibai Dattatraya Pakode and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-07-1970
Property
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 36, 100, 100(2), 100(12), 120, 124, 125 and 145; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145, 145(4) and 145(6); Tenancy Laws; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code - Sections 250 and 257
AIR1971Bom148; (1971)73BOMLR470; 1970MhLJ805
of the applicant, it is necessary to consider the scope of a suit under S. 6 of the Specific Relief Act. 1963. It is a suit by a person dispossessed of immovable property within a period of six months prior … was attempting to take forcible possession of it from her. On 2-8-1966 she instituted proceedings against Atmaram under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. On 16th November 1966 as a result of inquiry under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Sadashiv Shyama Sawant (Smt. Satyabhama Sadashiv Sawant and ors.) ...
Mumbai
Mar-28-2008
Property
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6, 9 and 6(1); General Clauses Act - Sections 3
(2008)110BOMLR1114; 2008(5)MhLj279
state in brief, the plaintiff-respondent filed Regular Civil Suit No. 11 of 1989 under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for possession of the suit property on the ground that the contesting defendants had forcibly taken possession of … some of them.2. To state in brief, the plaintiff-respondent filed Regular Civil Suit No. 11 of 1989 under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for possession of the suit property on the ground that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHawabai Wd/O Late Suleman Haji Vs. Abdul Sattar Suleman Haji Ahmed Oom ...
Mumbai
Oct-06-1994
Property
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6(2); Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 15(1); Limitation Act, 1963 - Articles 64 and 65; Constitution of India - Article 372(1)
1995(2)BomCR551
Counsel for the respondents contended that no appeal is provided against an order under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and, therefore, the present appeal is not maintainable. On the other hand, the learned Counsel for the appellant … on the question of maintainability of the Appeal.3. The Appellant-plaintiff filed the suit in the trial Court under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act for possession of the suit property on the allegation that the defendants
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPratapsing Ganpatrao Kadam Vs. Maruti Raghunath Todkar (through L.R's. ...
Mumbai
Jul-26-2002
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14 and 29(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6
AIR2003Bom11
from the date of dispossession. Considering that the issue is whether the suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 can be filed beyond the period of six months set out in Section 6 of the Specific Relief … prescribed for any suit, appeal or application by any special law or local law, the provisions contained in Sections 4 to 24 (inclusive) shall apply only insofar as, and to the extent to which, they are not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSham Sunder Rao and ors. Vs. Sri Saraswathi Vidya Peetham, Hyderabad
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-16-2002
PropertyContract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115, 144 and 151; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6
2002(3)ALD346; 2002(4)ALT645
no revision petition lies against a judgment and decree passed by any Court under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. They have also relied upon some decisions in support of their contentions. The Supreme Court of India in … dismissed without costs. Bothparties shall bear their own costs in thesetwo revision petitions. Property - wrongful dispossession - Sections 115 and 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagar Palika, Jind Vs. Jagat Singh, Advocate
Supreme Court of India
Mar-28-1995
ContractCivil
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 6 and 9
AIR1995SC1377; 1995(43)BLJR886; JT1995(3)SC281; (1995)111PLR225; 1995(2)SCALE512; (1995)3SCC426; [1995]3SCR9; 1995(2)LC241(SC)
should be treated as a suit based on possession and dispossession in terms of Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. (Once a suit has been filed by the respondent claiming to be the owner and being in possession … behalf of the respondent, should be treated as a suit based on possession and dispossession in terms of Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. (Once a suit has been filed by the respondent claiming to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudhir Jaggi and anr. Vs. Sunil Akash Sinha Choudhury and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-11-2004
PropertyCivil
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 9
2004(6)ALD93(SC); 2004(3)AWC2729(SC); JT2004(6)SC336; (2005)1MLJ19(SC); 2005(I)OLR(SC)370; 2004(6)SCALE580; (2004)7SCC515
suit filed on 12.3.1979 was within the period of six months as prescribed by section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The learned Single Judge further found that there was no evidence of agreement between the developer and defendants … 10.2.1979 and, therefore, the suit filed on 12.3.1979 was within the period of six months as prescribed by section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The learned Single Judge further found that there was no evidence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »