Advanced Search Results

Pratapsing Ganpatrao Kadam Vs. Maruti Raghunath Todkar (through L.R's. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14 and 29(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR2003Bom11

of Court would also be proceeding in first instance - they are admittedly civil proceedings. (ii) Applicability - Sections 14 and 29 (2) of Limitation Act, 1963 and Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 - provisions of … from the date of dispossession. Considering that the issue is whether the suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 can be filed beyond the period of six months set out in Section 6 of the Specific Relief

Vineet Kumar Vs. Smt. Bhagwan Dei

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30, 32 and 33; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(2) and 43; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(18), 12, 122 and 125 - Order 22, Rule 9

Reported in : AIR1978All312

an amendment in Section 32 of the Arbitration Act which had been effected by Section 43 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, had not been brought to my notice. It is further contended that attention was not drawn to Section … palpably based on a false allegation. It has been stated in para 14 of the affidavit in support of the review application:'That against the order … took the view that such an allegation, and a suit based thereon did not attract the provisions of Sections 32 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, Secondly, I took the view that after an award had been

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Millenium Mumbai Broadcast Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(1); Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 14

Reported in : AIR2006SC2751; 2006(3)AWC2128(SC); 2006(4)BomCR694; 2006(2)CTLJ111(SC); 2006(5)SCALE44; (2006)10SCC510

General that the direction issued by the Tribunal, as quoted supra, is contrary to Section 14(1)(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, is concerned, the same is stated to be rejected. The provisions of the Specific Relief Act would not … the learned Additional Solicitor General that the direction issued by the Tribunal, as quoted supra, is contrary to Section 14(1)(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, is concerned, the same is stated to be rejected. The provisions

Mittal Services Vs. Escotel Mobile Communication Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 14(1), 16, 38, 41 and 42; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)517; AIR2003Delhi410; 2003(69)DRJ677

the termination is bad. It is pleaded that the suit itself is barred by section 14(1) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 as the contract between the parties is not specifically enforceable. From its very nature, it is added, the … seeking a declaration that the termination is bad. It is pleaded that the suit itself is barred by section 14(1) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 as the contract between the parties is not specifically enforceable. From

Principal, Shri Jodha Singh Inter College, Harkoopur, Etawah Vs. Ist A ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 39, Rules 2 and 2(2); Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Sections 14 and 34; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16G(4); Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulation, 1921 - Regulation 31; Uttar Pradesh Public Services Tribunal Act, 1976 - Sections 2 and 6; Specific Relief Act, 1877

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC335

of Chapter III of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 and Section 14 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Sections 2(b) and 6 of U.P. Public Services Tribunal Act, 1976 - suit filed by employee for declaration that … Khatauu v. Atlas Mills. In Hungerford Investment Trust Ltd. v. Haridas Mundhra and others, this Court observed that Specific Relief Act, 1963, is also not an exhaustive enactment and it does not consolidate the whole law on the subject.' As

State Bank of India and ors. Vs. S.N. Goyal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 43(1); State Bank of India Officers Service Rules - Rules 50(4), 67 and 68(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100 and 152 - Order 11 - Rules 1, 1(1), 1(3), 3, 12 and 15 - Order 20 - Order 42, Rules 1 and 2; Constitution of India - Articles 309 and 311

Reported in : AIR2008SC2594; [2008(117)FLR967]; JT2008(6)SC398; (2008)IIILLJ567SC; 2008(7)SCALE415; (2008)8SCC92; 2009(1)SLJ403(SC); 2008AIRSCW4355; 2008LABIC3514; 2008AIRSCW4355; 2008LABIC3514; 2008-III-LLJ-567; [2008] 7 SCR 631; AIR2008SC259447

amounted to granting specific performance of a contract of personal service which is barred by Section 14 of Specific Relief Act, 1963?(ii) In the absence of a pleading that the order imposing penalty was invalid because the Appointing Authority acted … reinstate the respondent, amounted to granting specific performance of a contract of personal service which is barred by Section 14 of Specific Relief Act, 1963?(ii) In the absence of a pleading that the order imposing penalty was

Smt. Eufemia Clara Pereira and ors. Vs. Minguel Luis Gomes and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14 and 14(1)

Reported in : AIR2005Bom202; 2004(4)ALLMR149

sale deed was on the part of the plaintiff. Shri Gude has referred to Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 and placed reliance on the decision reported in Ram Awadh (dead) by LRs v. Achhaibar Dubey : [2000]1SCR566 … non execution of the sale deed was on the part of the plaintiff. Shri Gude has referred to Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 and placed reliance on the decision reported in Ram Awadh (dead)

Percept D'Markr (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Zaheer Khan and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Companies Act, 1956; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 36; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 14(1), 41 and 42; Arbitration and Conciliation Rules

Reported in : AIR2006SC3426; 2006(2)ARBLR34(SC); 2006(2)AWC1869(SC); 2006(5)BomCR322; (2006)5CompLJ224(SC); 2006(1)CTLJ100(SC); (2006)4MLJ1695; 2006(3)SCALE324; (2006)4SCC227

for respondent No. 1 submitted that the agreement may not be specifically enforced under Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and accordingly, under Section 41(e), no injunction could be granted as prayed for by the appellant. According to … Refusal - Negative Covenant - Extension of, beyond contractual terms - Section 27, Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 14, 14(1), Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Appellant appointed sole and exclusive agent of first respondent under promotion agreement

K.M. Jaina Beevi and ors. Vs. M.K. Govindaswami

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 21; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14

Reported in : AIR1967Mad369

our. The counter part in India of Section 21 in the old Act is Section 14 in the Specific Relief Act 1963, and it is clear from its provisions that they have been modeled more or less on the views … be necessary to deal with the rest of his points. Nevertheless, we shall briefly dispose of them first.(4) Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act 1877 speaks of a contract which cannot be specifically enforced, and of

Rattan Lal Vs. S.N. Bhalla and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 14(1)(c), 20; Constitution of India - Articles 136

contract, which is by its nature determinable, is incapable of being specifically enforced under Section 14(1)(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The Division Bench held that in terms of Clause 9 of the Agreement to Sell, the contract was … indicated further that a contract, which is by its nature determinable, is incapable of being specifically enforced under Section 14(1)(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The Division Bench held that in terms of Clause 9 of