Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: specific relief act 1963 section 9 · Page 1 of about 10,059 results (0.173 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 08 1985

State of Karnataka Vs. Vishwanatha Rao

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-08-1985

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2) and 9; Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules - Rule 12

Reported in : ILR1985KAR2460

that the question whether the suit is or is not maintainable in view of Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 cannot be gone into by this Court in these batch of cases. I have already pointed out how … can be sought and granted in exercise of the ordinary civil jurisdiction of Civil Court by virtue of Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In this connection it was further argued that the Supreme Court has,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2003

M.S. Madhusoodhanan and anr. Vs. Kerala Kaumudi Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-01-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 2(13), 81, 81(1), 81(2) and 284; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 31(1), 108, 155, 159, 161(2), 164, 189(2), 193, 193(1), 194, 195, 397, 398, 402, 403 and 446; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(10), 4, 9, 8(2), 9(1) and 9(2); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 29; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 16, 20 and 20(2); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 12; Arbitration Act, 1940; Evidence Act - Sections 16 and 114; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act - Sections 28B and 265; Citizenship Rules - Rules 3, 59 and 60; Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 18; Stamps Act

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD1(SC); [2003]117CompCas19(SC); (2003)4CompLJ185(SC); 2003(6)SCALE191; (2004)9SCC204; [2003]46SCL695(SC)

paid, that the suit was barred by limitation that the Karar was barred by the provisions of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and that the court did not have the jurisdiction to entertain the suit.137. The learned Single Judge decided … express intention was to effect an immediate transfer of the shares and to agree upon the consideration later. Section 9 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 permits this.28. Section 4 read with Section 2(10) of the Sale

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2007

Sh. Deep Chand Vs. Sh. Kulanand Lakhera and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2007

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 9; Land Tenancy Act; Madras Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955; Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955; Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 86A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 145, 145(1) and 146(1)

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT765; 2007(95)DRJ683

a fairly hazy picture. 25. The fore runner of Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 was Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act 1877. It was the subject matter of discussion in various decisions.26. In the … to the thief and recover the same as per a recognized legal procedure. 18. Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 is a statutory recognition of possessory suits as distinct from proprietary suits. It reads as under:6. Suit by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 03 1992

Bomi Munchershaw Mistry Vs. Kesharwani Co-operative Housing Society Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-03-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 3 and 63; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rules 9, 10 and 13 - Order 31, Rule 1; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 9, 20, 20(2) and 26; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3(2) - Schedule - Article 113

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR329

Order 31 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Sections 9, 20, 20 (2) and 26 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 115 of Evidence Act, 1872, Section 2 of Contract Act, 1872 and Section 3 (2) and Article 113

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2007

Adhunik Steels Ltd. Vs. Orissa Manganese and Minerals Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-10-2007

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 11, 11(6), 28 and 37(1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(3), 36, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42; Arbitration Act; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rule 37; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 94 - Order 39, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR2007SC2563; 2007(3)ARBLR65(SC); (2007)3CompLJ316(SC); 2007(4)CTC340; JT2007(9)SC147; 2007(6)MhLj502; (2007)6MLJ80(SC); 2007MPLJ436(SC); 2007(9)SCALE126; (2007)7SCC125; 2; MANU/SC/2936/2007

varieties of specific relief are, decree of specific performance and the injunction (See David Bean on Injunctions). The Specific Relief Act, 1963 was intended to be 'An Act to define and amend the law relating to certain kinds of specific … C.A. No. 6570 of 2005 challenging an order of the District Court at Sundargarh in a petition under Section 9 of the Act filed by the appellant in C.A. No. 6569 of 2005 and the respondent in C.A.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2002

Varadarasu Alias Devarasu Vs. Malone Veerasamy Alias Thanapal,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-09-2002

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 9

Reported in : (2003)1MLJ294

case.17. In SOMNATHBERMAN VS . DR.S.P. RAJU AND ANOTHER , it has been held that,'Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is in no way inconsistent with the position that as against a wrong doer, prior possession of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2007

Percept Talent Management Pvt. Ltd. a company registered under the Com ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-07-2007

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(1), 41 and 42; Contract Act - Sections 27

Reported in : 2008(2)ALLMR72; 2008(2)ARBLR49(Bom); 2008(2)BomCR654; 2008(3)MhLj94

prima facie be barred by Clauses (a), (b) and (d) of Sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The Contract between the parties is essentially a contract for personal services of which specific performance cannot prima … difference between the parties will ultimately have no bearing little the conclusion of these proceedings which arise under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.The Petition:4. The Promotion Agreement contains an arbitration clause and in these

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 1980

Chandra and Co. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-12-1980

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6 and 6(2); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 9; Limitation Act, 1859 - Sections 15 and 17; Constitution of India - Article 226;Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 - Sections 91; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR1981Raj217

and to dispossess a person in actual possession without having recourse to a Court. Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 (Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877) empowers a person who has been dispossessed without his consent of immovable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2008

Shri Sadashiv Shyama Sawant (Smt. Satyabhama Sadashiv Sawant and ors.) ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-28-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6, 9 and 6(1); General Clauses Act - Sections 3

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR1114; 2008(5)MhLj279

state in brief, the plaintiff-respondent filed Regular Civil Suit No. 11 of 1989 under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for possession of the suit property on the ground that the contesting defendants had forcibly taken possession of … Single Judge of the Madras High Court had relied upon an earlier authority of Madras High Court under Section 9 of the then Specific Relief Act and held that only the tenant, who was dispossessed, could file a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2003

Mittal Services Vs. Escotel Mobile Communication Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-08-2003

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 14(1), 16, 38, 41 and 42; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9

Reported in : 2003VAD(Delhi)517; AIR2003Delhi410; 2003(69)DRJ677

the termination is bad. It is pleaded that the suit itself is barred by section 14(1) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 as the contract between the parties is not specifically enforceable. From its very nature, it is added, the … Rajasthan Breweries (supra) would suffice to set the controversy at rest. In Rajasthan Breweries, by an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an ad interim injunction staying notices of termination issued by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial