Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: specific relief act 1963 section 4 · Page 1 of about 11,619 results (0.192 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 10 2009

Shakuntala Devi and ors. Vs. Chamru Mahto and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-10-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 6; Limitation Act - Shedule - Article 137; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125, 145, 145(1), 145(4), 145(6), 397(3) and 482

Reported in : AIR2009SC2075; 2009(57)BLJR968; 2009CriLJ1770; JT2009(3)SC502; RLW2009(3)SC2736; (2009)3SCC310; 2009(2)LC745(SC):2009AIRSCW1896:2009(3)KCCR2138

by limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act and also by virtue of Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. We are in agreement with Mr. Sanyal that the provisions of the Specific Relief Act had been misapplied … for quashing of the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khagaria, on 6.1.2006. Mr. Sanyal urged that Section 4 of the Specific Relief Act makes it quite clear that the provisions of the Act would be available

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 1972

Bai Dahi Vs. Amulakhbhai Gambhirbhai Barot

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-25-1972

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 6 and 6(2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 29 (2); Bombay Rent Act - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR1974Guj106; (1973)GLR801

the section.10. The next argument of Mr. Zaveri is that in the context of Section 5 of the Specific Relief Act. 1963, Section 6 provides a special remedy which is fettered by a special condition. This analysis made by Mr. Zaveri. … 8th January. 1968 the City Civil Court was closed. The question which has, therefore, been raised is whether Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to such a suit, Section 4 provides thus :'Where the prescribed period

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1970

Atmaram Panduji Tidke Vs. Prabhawatibai Dattatraya Pakode and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-07-1970

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 36, 100, 100(2), 100(12), 120, 124, 125 and 145; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 145, 145(4) and 145(6); Tenancy Laws; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code - Sections 250 and 257

Reported in : AIR1971Bom148; (1971)73BOMLR470; 1970MhLJ805

of the applicant, it is necessary to consider the scope of a suit under S. 6 of the Specific Relief Act. 1963. It is a suit by a person dispossessed of immovable property within a period of six months prior … result, the civil revision application is dismissed with costs. 11. Revision application dismissed. Specific Belief Act (47 of 1963), Section 6 - Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act (Bom. 99 of 1958), Section 124--Criminal Procedure Code … wife, the plaintiff, are not on good terms with each other. On 4th May 1966 Atmaram served a notice on Dattatraya asking him to restore

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 29 2009

L. Venkata Krishna Reddy (Died) and ors. Vs. M. Anjappa (Died) Per L.R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-29-2009

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 28; Limitation Act - Sections 5 - Scheduled - Article 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 21, Rule 32

Reported in : AIR2009AP179; 2009(15)ALT599

execution petition on that ground alone. It is also contended that in view of Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the Court below ought to have held that the contract was deemed to have been rescinded on the … Rs. 2,50,000/- of Rs. 2,50,000/- and necessary registration charges in the Court.3. Pursuant thereto, the plaintiffs 2 to 4 (respondents 2 to 5 herein) along with respondents 6 to 24 who are the legal representatives of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2003

Kalidas Mondal Vs. Abdul HosseIn and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-22-2003

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Section 9(2); ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 6, 6(1) and 6(4); ;Limitation Act, 1859 - Section 15; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : (2003)3CALLT253(HC)

the revisional application. He drew my attention to the provisions of Sub-section (4) of Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and argued that although a decree has been passed in Title Suit No. 174 of 1979, but as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2008

State Bank of India and ors. Vs. S.N. Goyal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-02-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Sections 43(1); State Bank of India Officers Service Rules - Rules 50(4), 67 and 68(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100 and 152 - Order 11 - Rules 1, 1(1), 1(3), 3, 12 and 15 - Order 20 - Order 42, Rules 1 and 2; Constitution of India - Articles 309 and 311

Reported in : AIR2008SC2594; [2008(117)FLR967]; JT2008(6)SC398; (2008)IIILLJ567SC; 2008(7)SCALE415; (2008)8SCC92; 2009(1)SLJ403(SC); 2008AIRSCW4355; 2008LABIC3514; 2008AIRSCW4355; 2008LABIC3514; 2008-III-LLJ-567; [2008] 7 SCR 631; AIR2008SC259447

amounted to granting specific performance of a contract of personal service which is barred by Section 14 of Specific Relief Act, 1963?(ii) In the absence of a pleading that the order imposing penalty was invalid because the Appointing Authority acted … Bank of India) against the judgment dated 11.12.2003 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in R.S.A. No. 4184 of 2002.2. A charge-sheet dated 28.4.1994 was issued by the Appellant Bank to the respondent alleging that when

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2005

Uttar Pradesh State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited Vs. Bangal ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-22-2005

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 4, 10 and 14;

Reported in : 2005(3)ARBLR254(Kar); 2005(2)CTLJ451(Kar); 2005(5)KarLJ112

the contract of building, which is a contract which cannot be specifically enforced under Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. As regards the learned Single Judge directing the parties to take recourse to arbitration, it was submitted that … mentions that the documents enclosed to it form part of the contract of agreement and we find that Section 4 of Part 1 of Volume II of the tender document refers to special conditions of contract. The said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1981

Prag Datt Vs. Smt. Saraswati Devi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-08-1981

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 9, 16 and 20(4); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 58; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1982All37

that the plaintiffs-respondents having failed to comply with the requirements of law contained in Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Form 47 contained in Appendix A of Civil P. C., the suit should have been dismissed in … S.J. Hyder, J. 1. Har Vallabh plaintiff-respondent No. 2, was the Bhumidhar of plot No. 417 measuring 1-20 acres. The said plot is situated in village Kandeshi Pachar, District Etawah. On July 29, 1964,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1997

S.K. Kochar Vs. Nimmi Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-01-1997

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20 and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 1 - Order 22, Rule 1 - Order 23, Rule (4); Contract Act, 1872; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 31

Reported in : 1997VAD(Delhi)213; 68(1977)DLT914

could not get exemption under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.(69) Under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 it is purely a discretion of the Court either to grant or reject the relief of specific performance … Purchaser own claim for refund or can have the amount paid refunded at any time he likes. Clause 4 reads as under : Clause4-That the Vendor hereby undertakes that he shall within ninety days after getting the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2004

Surendra Kumar Vs. Amarjeet Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-07-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17, 17(2) and 49; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 4 and 54; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14

Reported in : AIR2004All335; 2004(4)AWC3134

No. 2 to 12, was a concluded contract which did not require registration and, was enforceable under the Specific Relief Act, 1963?'10. Heard Sri Pramod Kumar Jain, the learned counsel for the appellant assisted by Sri Gaurav Jain, Advocate and … Section 17(2)(v) of the Registration Act has been inserted by U.P. Act No. 57 of 1976 w.e.f. 1-1-77.22. Section 4 of the Transfer of Property Act reads as under :'Section 4, Enactments relating to contracts to be taken

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial