Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: specific relief act 1963 section 27 · Page 1 of about 5,202 results (0.134 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 27 1976

Kamarbai and ors. Vs. Badrinarayan and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-27-1976

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 23; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 27, 27(2), 28, 31 and 34; Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 84; Criminal Law

Reported in : AIR1977Bom228; (1976)78BOMLR579; 1977MhLJ115

transfer is void, the Court should be guided by the provisions of chaps. IV to VI of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Section 27 of that Act inter alia laid down that any person interested in a contract may sue to have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2003

Begum Seeni Pichai Ammal Vs. Janab K. Muthu Mohamed (Died) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-17-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53(2)and 53A; Limitation Act - Sections 15 and 61 - Schedule - Article 54; Contract Act; Evidence Act - Sections 68; Specific Relief Act 1963 - Sections 27 and 27(2)

Reported in : (2003)3MLJ141

held that except where the statute provides an exception to the rule as in Section 27(b) of the Specific Relief Act 1963, no person, as the owner of the property, who has entered into an agreement to sell the property,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 1998

Koraboina Lakshmi Vs. Malkapuram Anasuya

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-21-1998

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 27 and 28

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD469; 1998(5)ALT316

EP No.7 of 1990 in OS No.1080 of 1981 on 15-4-1992 under Sections 27 and 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for rescission of the agreement of sale in respect of which the specific performance had been decreed on … deposited an amount of Rs.30,000/-on 15-2-1989 i.e., three years after the date fixed by the decree. The Accounts Section of the trial Court seems to have put up a note to the effect that the deposit had

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 07 2004

Sargunam (Dead) by Lr. Vs. Chidambaram and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19, 20 and 20(2); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 27; Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1)

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3721(SC); (2005)1CALLT37(SC); (SCSuppl)2005(2)CHN14; JT2004(9)SC5; RLW2005(1)SC43; 2004(8)SCALE595; (2005)1SCC162

a transferee without notice of the original contract within the meaning of exception in Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.16. Similarly, in the case of Baburam Bag v. Madhab Chandra Pallay reported in : AIR1914Cal333 , it has … make enquiry, into the nature of that possession, he cannot claim to be a transferee without notice under Section 27(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1877.17. In the light of the above tests, we may now examine the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1995

PravIn S/O Jethalal Kamdar Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Collector ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-26-1995

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 5, 6 and 27; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 22, 31, 32 and 33; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 13, 20, 21 and 65; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 17(1) - Articles 58 and 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 20, Rules 12;

Reported in : AIR1996Bom280; 1995(4)BomCR448; (1995)97BOMLR585; 1996(1)MhLj630

is however, true that there is discretion conferred upon the. Court under Sections 31 and 32 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 an cancellation of the instrument as void or variable or in granting the relief of declaration that the … be seen that the ULC Act came into force in the State of Maharashtra with effect from 17-2-1976. Section 27(1) of the said Act required the plaintiff and the prospective purchaser to obtain the permission from the Competent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2007

S. Jahanara W/O. S. Abid Rep. by Her P.A. Holder and Husband Sri. S. A ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-13-2007

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 27(1), 28, 28(1) and 28(2); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 35; Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act

Reported in : 2008(1)KarLJ42; 2007(5)AIRKarR83:AIR2007NOC2229.

to for convenience as the Trial Court), on I.A.No. 28 in O.S.No. 76/1985 filed under Section 28(1) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.2. Before proceeding further, I set here below the relevant facts of the case:The petitioner - plaintiff had filed … having not done that, the petitioner - plaintiff had filed series of I.As., i.e.: I.A. Nos. 25 to 27 before the trial Court seeking extension of time to deposit the above said balance of the sale consideration.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2006

Percept D'Markr (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Zaheer Khan and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-22-2006

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Companies Act, 1956; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9 and 36; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 14(1), 41 and 42; Arbitration and Conciliation Rules

Reported in : AIR2006SC3426; 2006(2)ARBLR34(SC); 2006(2)AWC1869(SC); 2006(5)BomCR322; (2006)5CompLJ224(SC); 2006(1)CTLJ100(SC); (2006)4MLJ1695; 2006(3)SCALE324; (2006)4SCC227

for respondent No. 1 submitted that the agreement may not be specifically enforced under Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and accordingly, under Section 41(e), no injunction could be granted as prayed for by the appellant. According to … - Percept D. Markr (India) Pvt. Ltd. and the respondent No. 1 - Zaheer Khan is void under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 has been in restraint of trade. It was submitted by learned senior

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 14 1965

Lalbhai Dalpatbhai and Co. Vs. Chittaranjan Chandulal Pandya

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-14-1965

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(1), 38(2) and 57; Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Contract Act - Sections 27; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 21 and 44

Reported in : [1965(11)FLR299]

14 (1), 38 (2) and 57 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, Article 19 (1) of Constitution of India, Section 27 of Contract Act and Sections 21 and 44 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 - whether negative stipulation in … relief by way of injunction depends in India upon statute and is governed by the provision of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Section 36 of that Act places the grant of an injunction in the discretion of the Court; a discretion

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 2001

Mahendra C. Mehta and Others Vs. Kousalya Co-op. Housing Society Ltd., ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-13-2001

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 126; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 27 and 28 - Schedule - Articles 47, 64, 65, 136, 137, 138 140, 141, 142 and 144; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950; Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982; Urban Land Ceiling Act

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD102; 2001(5)ALT197

47, 64, 65, 136, 137, 138, 140, 141, 142 and 144 of Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 and … establish his adverse possession which has the effect of extinguishing the title of the owner by operation of Section 27 of Limitation Act, 1963 and if he fails to do so plaintiff cannot be non-suited merely because he

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1990

Vimala Ammal Vs. C. Suseela and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-02-1990

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 27; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10(2) - Order 5, Rule 4 - Order 21, Rules 99 and 102; Indian Trust Act, 1892 - Sections 91

Reported in : AIR1991Mad209

can alienate if only subject to the rights created under the prior agreement of sale.'Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 corresponding to S. 27(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, also provides that specific performance of a contract

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial