Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: specific relief act 1963 section 19 · Page 1 of about 7,268 results (0.103 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 09 1985

Mohd. Hanif and ors. Vs. Marian Begam and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-1985

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 15, 19 and 22

Reported in : AIR1986Bom15; 1986(1)BomCR33; 1985MhLJ625

case, however, there will be no order as to costs of this appeal. Appeal allowed. The scope of Section 19 (c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 was discussed in respect of a case where 'A' filed a … for the respondent No.1 contended that in view of the provisions of Ss. 15 and 22 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 provides as to who may obtain specific performance and that except as otherwise provided by Chapter II, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 29 2004

Gomi Bai and ors. Vs. Uma Rastogi and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-29-2004

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 8, Rule 5(3); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 15, 19, 20 and 22(1); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 54; Evidence Act - Sections 102

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD631

of her husband and therefore suit by her as nominee is maintainable as per Section 15 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The respondents/ defendants did not deny the factum of nomination and the lower Court having found oral agreement … Singh, : AIR1995SC945a , the Supreme Court laid down that the subsequent purchaser can only plead defense under Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act and cannot challenge the agreement. The relevant observations are as under:That plea is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2008

Dr. N. Kasinath Vs. Sri Arun R. Rawell and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-05-2008

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19, 21, 21(1), 21(2), 21(3), 21(4), 21(5), 22 and 22(3); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3; Contract Act - Sections 73; Bangalore Development Authority Act; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 54

Reported in : ILR2008KAR857; 2008(5)KLJ260; 2008(2)KCCR907; 2008(3)AIRKarR66; AIR2008NOC1620; 2008(3)ICC408; 2008AIHC2294(Kar)

the schedule site. Therefore, the third defendant is not entitled to the protection under Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (for short 'the Act'). Alternatively, it is contended that since the court below refused to grant a decree

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 01 2000

Ram Niwas (Dead) Through Lrs. Vs. Smt. Bano and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-01-2000

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19 and 20(2); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR2000SC2921; JT2000(8)SC340; (2001)1MLJ33(SC); 2000(II)OLR(SC)446; 2000(5)SCALE363; (2000)6SCC685; [2000]Supp2SCR39; 2000(2)LC1360(SC)

II to Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act and the provisions of Section 20(2) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, determine the result of this appeal.2. It will be apt to begin our discussion with Section 19(b) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 1979

Smt. Bannobi and ors. Vs. Mst. Afrozzia and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-03-1979

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1979All124

money in good faith and withoutnotice of the original contract within the meaning of Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, with the result that specific performance of the contract in the plaintiff's favour could not be enforced against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2008

S. Abdul Khader Vs. Abdul Wajid (D) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-11-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 41, 43 and 52; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19, 20 and 21; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23

Reported in : 2008(4)AWC4220(SC); 2008(2)CTLJ439(SC); JT2008(10)SC413; 2009(1)KarLJ400; 2009(1)MhLj61; RLW2009(1)SC206; 2008(12)SCALE473; (2008)9SCC522; 2008AIRSCW6645; 2008(9)SCC522; 2008(6)Supreme672; 2008(5)LH(SC)3372

both the courts below appear to have also lost sight of the provisions of Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 which provides as follows:19. Relief against parties and persons claiming under them by subsequent title. - Except as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2005

Jagir Singh Vs. Ranjeet Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-15-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19 and 20; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 27; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 14, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 22

Reported in : AIR2006Raj105; RLW2005(4)Raj2941; 2005(4)WLC447

the Allahabad High Court observed that two fold requirement of the provisions of the Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 was that the transferee should have paid money in good faith and he showed have done so without

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2001

P. Retnaswamy Vs. A. Raja and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-04-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19 and 20; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54 and 55(1)

Reported in : AIR2002Mad131

above contention, the learned Senior Counsel for the second defendent would submit that under the provisions of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 or the Indian Contract Act or any common law, there is nothing which would disentitle the subsequent transferee … and is bound to suffer a decree as would be enforceable against his vendor. It is true that Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act. 1963 (hereinafter called 'the Act') entitles the decree holder for specific performance to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2002

Rajendra Kantilal Dalal Vs. Bombay Builders Co. (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-15-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19 and 21

Reported in : AIR2002Bom408; 2002(3)ALLMR10; 2002(5)BomCR102; (2002)4BOMLR480; 2002(4)MhLj141

the effect of Section 19 of the 1877 Act which corresponds to the Section 21 of the present Specific Relief Act, 1963 has the following effect :--The next part of Section 19 imposes a mandatory duty upon the Court to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2003

Devinder Singh Alias Dalvinder Singh and ors. Vs. Mansha Singh and ors ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-21-2003

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR2003P& H166

by defendant-respondent Nos. 4 to 6 in their favour. He has further submitted that Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (for brevity, 'the Act') provides protection to a bona fide purchasers without notice. But if on making reasonable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial