Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: specific relief act 1963 section 12 · Page 1 of about 9,738 results (0.169 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 02 1977

Vineet Kumar Vs. Smt. Bhagwan Dei

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-02-1977

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30, 32 and 33; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(2) and 43; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(18), 12, 122 and 125 - Order 22, Rule 9

Reported in : AIR1978All312

an amendment in Section 32 of the Arbitration Act which had been effected by Section 43 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, had not been brought to my notice. It is further contended that attention was not drawn to Section … to have a bearing on the controversy was not brought to my notice. Lastly, reliance is placed on Section 12 C.P.C. to contend that a regular suit was not maintainable after the decision in Misc. Case No. 93

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 1998

K.M. Rajendran Vs. Arul Prakasam and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-26-1998

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 -- Sections 12(3), 16, 20 and 22(2); Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 17, 21, 91 and 92 Proviso (1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) -- Sections 151 -- Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : AIR1998Mad336; 1998(3)CTC25; (1998)IIMLJ423

be exercised according to settled principles of law and not arbitrarily as adumbrated under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Under Section 20 of the said Act, the court is not bound to grant the relief just because … above appeal. First respondent herein/plaintiff in that suit filed the same for specific performance of an agreement dated 12.1.1982 and also permanent injunction restraining the first defendant from disposing of the property covered under the agreement either

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 1994

Chhatar Singh Vs. Arjun Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-03-1994

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12(3) and 16(C); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96

Reported in : AIR1995Raj73; 1994(2)WLC533; 1994(2)WLN9

his argument my attention has been invited to the provisions of subsection (3) of Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (hereinafter called as 'the Act'), which is reproduced hereunder : --'12. Specific performance of part of contract. -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 15 2011

Shanker Singh Vs. Narinder Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 136; Specific Relief Act 1963 - Sections 12, 14, 20

Reported in : 2012(1)KLT19(SN); 2012(1)LW231; 2012(2)SCJ249; 2012(2)MWN(Civil)104

whether the High Court has erred in applying the provisions of Sections 12, 14 and 20 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 (hereinafter referred as `the act' for short), and (b) whether the agreement in question being vague in nature … in respect of valid part of the agreement on payment of the entire sale consideration in terms of Section 12 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.” It was submitted on behalf of the respondents herein that they were entitled

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1978

Bhaurao Shamrao Bhalme and ors. Vs. Mahadeo Raghu Yelekar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-16-1978

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12, 12(3), 20 and 20(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 6; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 22

Reported in : AIR1979Bom208; (1979)81BOMLR323

the respondent could convey only 1/4th share in the suit field, the provisions of Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 would be attracted and specific performance of the agreement to the extent of the respondent's share in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2007

Padmanabhuni Venkata Chalapathi Rao Vs. Sri Raja Kalidindi Kumara Saty ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-04-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 31

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD604

to be disturbed. While further elaborating his submissions, the learned Counsel pointed out to Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (for short, 'the Act') and would maintain that unless the essentials under Section 12 of the Act are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2005

P.C. Varghese Vs. Devaki Amma Balambika Devi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-07-2005

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12, 12(3), 20, 22 and 22(1)

Reported in : AIR2006SC145; 2005(3)BLJR2425; 101(2006)CLT143(SC); [2006(2)JCR38(SC)]; JT2005(10)SC278; 2005(4)KLT530(SC); 2005(8)SCALE320; (2005)8SCC486

was all along ready and willing to perform his part of contract.Sub-section (3) of Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (for short 'the Act') was enacted with a view to meet such eventualities when the whole of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2001

Rachakonda Narayana Vs. Ponthala Parvathamma and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-23-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12 (3) and 16; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 13, 14, 15 and 17

Reported in : 2001VIIAD(SC)61; AIR2001SC3353; JT2001(7)SC63; RLW2002(1)SC15; 2001(5)SCALE413; (2001)8SCC173; MANU/SC/0477/2001

plaintiff did not come with the suit claiming the benefit of sub-section (3) of Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and claimed performance of only part of the whole agreement, and, therefore

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2005

Surinder Singh Vs. Kapoor Singh (Dead) Th. Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-03-2005

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12, 12(2) and 12(3); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 15

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD106(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)816; 2005(2)AWC1685(SC); 2005(2)BLJR1316; 2005(5)BomCR605; 100(2005)CLT198(SC); 2005(2)CTC801; JT2005(11)SC8; 2005(3)MhLj747; (2005)5SCC1

dismissed. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 12 (3) - Specific performance of contract - Claim relinquished under Section 12 (3) (ii) regarding performance of balance

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2003

Krishnan Vs. Krishnan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-26-2003

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12(2) and 12(4)

Reported in : AIR2004Ker155; 2003(3)KLT166

the Specific Relief Act, 1877. The same has been reproduced with some modification in Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The general rule in Sub-section (1) of Section 12 is that the Court shall not direct the specific

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial