Advanced Search Results

In Re: Dop Raj Subba

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Sikkim Excise Act, 1992 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3096

Matched in: Court Sikkim

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited Vs. Dai Ichi Karkaria Limited, ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Maharashtra Sales Tax Act; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 28(3), 30 and 34(2)

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR294; (2008)110BOMLR2209; 2008BusLR731(Bom)

The learned Counsel for the appellant relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Sikkim Subba Associates v. State of Sikkim 2001 (2) Arb. LR 17 , to substantiate the argument on the … in detail taking into consideration various letters and that, as a special case, appellant agreed for reimbursement of excise duty on production of proof of payment of excise duty. The said letter further states that the delivery … the course of which the appellant addressed a letter dated 31st January, 1992 clarifying its position in regard to the various issues. The appellant also … Ichi Karkaria Limited, is a Public Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office in Mumbai. The respondentclaimant carries on business … payment. 2.7 The appellant instituted Arbitration Petition under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, challenging the … same would be subject to interference under Section 34(2)(a)(v) of the Act of 1940. On the other

Shirish Finance and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. M. Sreenivasulu Reddy

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1994 - Regulations 2, 2(1), 2(2), 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 5(1), 6, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 10, 10(1), 10(2), 11, 12, 13, 14, 14(1), 15, 16, 16(1), 17, 18, 19, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 20(3), 21, 21(1), 21(2), 21(3), 21(4), 22, 23, 33, 33(2), 34, 36, 37, 37(2) and 39; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 2(11), 6, 7(1), 9(2), 10, 11, 11(2), 11B, 12, 15H, 15K, 15T(2), 15Y, 15Z, 16(2), 18(5), 20, 20A, 21, 24, 27, 27(3), 28, 30, 32, 38, 87, 108, 111, 111(4), 111(5), 111(7), 111(9), 111(10), 111(12), 111(14), 111A, 111A(2), 111A(3), 111A(5), 155, 155(1), 155(3), 169, 397, 398, 538, 545, 630 and 630(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6; Indian Contract Act - Sections 23 and 57; Securities and Exchange

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR419

law as well as on account of the penal provisions in the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Furthermore, the provisions of Regulation 12 of the 1997 Regulations prohibit defendant Nos. 1 to 11 from acquiring … No. 3910 of 1997 M. Sreenivasulu Reddy v. Kishore R. Chhabria [2001] 34 SCL 1. In the suit, the plaintiffs have challenged the substantial acquisitions … said Regulation. The notice, therefore, called upon them to show-cause as to why action be not taken under Sections 11, 11B and 24 of the Act and Regulation 39 of the 1994 Regulations read with Regulations 44,

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smt. Susheela Devi Agarwal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Other Taxes

Reported in : [2010]187TAXMAN220(All)

in dispute are as follows.2. The assessee respondent received a lottery/prize money from Directorate of Lotteries, Government of Sikkim out of which a sum of Rs. 8,088 was deducted as tax at source. The assessee claimed before … the Central Board of Customs and Excise in exercise of its power under Section 37B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, are binding on the Department, the Department is precluded from challenging the correctness of the said circulars … Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court on consideration of various sections of the Income-tax Act including Section 5(1), with reference to lottery income

Bowreah Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 105 to 110, 110(1) and 124; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1996)1CALLT397(HC),1996(86)ELT28(Cal)

(Preventive), West Bengal has the jurisdiction over the whole of the State of West Bengal, the State of Sikkim and the Union of Territory of Andaman and Niccobor Island. In terms of another notification bearing No. 251/83 … also famished bank guarantees or letters of undertaking to the Director General of Foreign Trade to Secure the excise duty in case of non-fulfilment of stipulated export obligation. The consignments were received and allegedly upon verification thereof … godown of the petitioner in terms of Section 110(1) of the Customs Act hereinafter called and referred to for the sake of brevity as the … DECC for the import of articles therefor in terms of Export-Import Policy 1992-97. It was granted three licenses which are either quantity based or value … case before the Delhi High Court notices under Sections 28 and 124 of the Act had been

M/S Bhanu Construction Co. Pvt.Ltd. Vs. National thermal Power Corp. L ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30, 33, 17

v. UOI AIR 1987 Delhi 148, setting aside of the award is sought.33. Reliance is also placed on:-A. Sikkim Subba Associates v. State of Sikkim (2001) 5 SCC 629;B. Bombay Ammonia Pvt. Ltd. (supra) to contend that … Reliance is placed on:-1) Rickmers Verwaltung GMBH v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. 1999(1) SCC 1 (para 13);2) Asstt. Excise Commissioner v. ISSAC Peter 1994(4) SCC 104;3) Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd. v. Jain Studios Ltd. (2006) 2 … award was issued. Objections (I.A. No.4972/1994) under Section 30&33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 of the defendant to the award are for consideration. No objections … Arbitration Act, 1940.44. I am unable to, in exercise of jurisdiction under Sections 30&33 of the 1940 Act find a ground for interference with the … and Foundry Works v. SAIL (2001) 6 SCC 347 (paras 3,4&5);b) Pure Helium India Pvt. Ltd. v.

Harvinder Singh @ Bachhu Vs. The State Of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

from the vice of irrationality. (Vide Rajinder Kumar Kindra v. Delhi Admn. [(1984) 4 SCC635:1985. SCC (L&S) 131]., Excise & Taxation Officer-cum-Assessing Authority v. Gopi Nath & Sons [1992 Supp (2) SCC312, Triveni Rubber & Plastics v. … an accused may abscond as he might fear an illegal arrest. In Durga Burman Roy v. State of Sikkim, (2014) 13 SCC35 “13. “To abscond” means, go away secretly or illegally and hurriedly to escape from custody … FACTS2 The appellant, along with the co-accused (since deceased), was charged under Sections 302, 376, 511, 454, 380 read with Section 34 of the Indian … accused with a sword, recovered from the place of occurrence, which was actually used by them.9. Before the trial court, the prosecution has examined 16