Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: service rule 1967 · Page 1 of about 12,537 results (0.102 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 13 2002

Naresh Trikamlal Brahmbhatt Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-13-2002

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Gujarat Civil Services Classification and Recruitment (General) Rules, 1967 - Sections 5, 10 and 16

Reported in : (2003)1GLR835

P.B. Majmudar, J.1. Rule. Ms. Harsha Devani, learned Assistant Government Pleader, waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally … that while passing the fresh order, Rule 5 of the Gujarat Civil Services Classification and Recruitment (General) Rules, 1967 may be taken into consideration, which provides that no person could be appointed if he had failed to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2000

Mukund Laxmikant Bhalerao Vs. Zilla Parishad, Jalna and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-08-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Service Recruitment Rules, 1967 - Rule 6 and 6(6); Maharashtra Zilla Parishand District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964 - Rule 4 and 4(4); Maharashta Zilla Parishads District Services (Medical Attendance) Rules, 1971 - Rule 15(3)

Reported in : 2000(3)ALLMR440; (2001)4BOMLR222; 2001(3)MhLj843

Counsel for the petitioner, we will have to look into the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Service Recruitment Rules, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as the Recruitment Rules). Rule 6 provides for appointment by nomination, promotion or transfer. No … In all other cases, in the absence of such an order or in the absence of such a service rule, an express order of confirmation is necessary to give him such a right. Where after the period of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 1981

Sohan Lal Taneja, Etc. Vs. Delhi Administration, Etc.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-06-1981

Subject : Service

Acts : Subordinate Ministerial/Executive Service Rules, 1967 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 309

Reported in : 21(1982)DLT32; 1982LabIC1018

learned single Judge by which he rejected the challenge to the virus of the Delhi Administration .Subordinate Ministerial/Executive Service Rules, 1967 (hereinafter to be called the 1967 Rules) published on 10-2-1967. The Delhi Administration like any other … single Judge by which he rejected the challenge to the virus of the Delhi Administration .Subordinate Ministerial/Executive Service Rules, 1967 (hereinafter to be called the 1967 Rules) published on 10-2-1967. The Delhi Administration like any other State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 29 1991

Vijay Singh Deora Vs. the State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-29-1991

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1992(1)WLC188; 1991WLN(UC)469

pursunace of various advertisements issued after the advertisement (Annexure 2). The Rajasthan Engineering Subordinate Service (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules of 1967') were amended vide notification dated 5.1.1981 and proviso (8) was … separate class from non-graduate Supervisors both under the Hyderabad Rules as well as the Andhra Rules (Mad. Engineering Service Rule 811953) and they have never been integrated into one class. The same differentiation into two classes also persisted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 1979

Dr. B.R. Kulkarni Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-14-1979

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1979)2GLR437

with the provisions of Gujarat Civil Service Classification and Recruitment (general) Rules, 1967 and may also be relaxed in favour of candidates possessing exceptionally good … 4 in preference to him was without any application of mind on the part of the Gujarat Public Service Commission in so far as the latter body had not taken into account the past record of the … College, Ahmedabad on the ground that the selection of the respondent No. 3 is contrary to the statutory Rules and is violative of Article 16 of the Constitution and that the selection of the respondent No. 4

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1997

Kailash Chand and Others Vs. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-03-1997

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32; Delhi Administration Subordinate Service Rules, 1967 - Rules 5, 6, 19 and 26; Delhi Administration Subordinate Service (Amendment) Rules, 1989 Rule 6;

Reported in : AIR1997SC951; JT1997(2)SC337; (1997)ILLJ838SC; 1997(1)SCALE658; (1997)3SCC27; [1997]1SCR791

special leave petition are dismissed. Service - fixation of seniority - Rule 26 of Delhi Administrative Subordinate Services Rule, 1967 - Rule 26 as amended in 1985 challenged - earlier validity of Rule 26 upheld as seniority computed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2002

Subrata Deb Barma and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-08-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Tripura Civil Services (Training and Departmental Examination) Rules, 1975 - Rules 20 and 22

appearing in the departmental examination under the aforequoted three notifications/orders.13. In view of Rule 22 of Tripura Civil Service Rule, 1967, the incumbent appointed under Rule 5 or Rule 17 shall have to undergo training as prescribed under the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 1984

Dr. L. Krishna Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-15-1984

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Karnataka State Civil Services (Direct Recruitment by Selection) Rules, 1973 - Rule 6 and 6(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16(1); Karnataka Health Services (Collegiate Branch) Recruitment Rules, 1967

Reported in : ILR1986KAR255

respondent-2 in these cases, which will be hereafter referred to as either 'Government' or respondent-1, the Karnataka Public Service Commission, Bangalore, arrayed as either respondent-1 or respondent 2 which will be hereafter referred to or the KPSC … of this Court in Ajjappa v. State of Mysore and Ors., ILR 1967 Mysore 809. 8. Before us, neither of the parties have urged that … the same. 14. Petitioners in Writ Petitions Nos. 73 and 639 of 1981 have challenged the validity of Rule 6(1) of the Karnataka State Civil Services (Direct Recruitment by Selection) Rules, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 1985

Ajit Singh, Etc. Vs. Delhi Administration, Etc.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-01-1985

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Administration Subordinate/Ministerial/Executive Service Rules, 1967 - Rule 6(3); Delhi Administration Seniority Rules, 1965 - Rule 7

Reported in : 28(1985)DLT6; ILR1985Delhi835; 1985LabIC967

holding of the examinations for the first time in 1973-74 after the Delhi Administration Subordinate (Ministerial/ Executive) Service Rules, 1967 had come into force, and allowing all persons to become eligible between the years 1967 to 1974 … 20th January, 1979 promoting some of the respondents from Grade-111 to Giade-II of the Delhi Administration Subordinate (Executive) Service. The appellants contended before the learned Single Judge in the writ petition that holding of the examinations for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2002

G. Gopal Rao and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-18-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Roads and Buildings) Engineering Service Rules, 1967 - Rules 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD625; 2002(5)ALT491

higher posts are governed by the rules known as 'Andhra Pradesh (Roads and Buildings ) Engineering Service Rules, 1967' issued in G.O. Ms. No. 1023, Public Works (F1) Department, dated 27th June, 1967 (for short 'the Service … respectively after completing their post-graduation in Engineering on temporary basis under Rule 10(a)(i) of the State and Subordinate Service Rules. The petitioners thereafter appeared and passed the Special Qualifying test conducted by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial