Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: semiconductor integrated circuits layout design act 2000 section 6 · Page 1 of about 2 results (0.012 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 28 2015

Sunil Alag Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-28-2015

Subject : Right to Information

HRD Div.2.4. Microelectronics initiative (2001): With a view to protect IPR in VLSI design, drafted Subordinate Legislation under “Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act 2000.” The same was vetted and notified by Law Ministry.21. The Cabinet Secretariat‟s note of 13.03.2009, after highlighting that … administrators who plan, direct or co-ordinate the execution of S& T activities.” 6. Annexure-II, which contained the recruitment and promotion rules, stated that: "Field Experience … Sh. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Sh. Nitya Sharma and Sh. M.P. Singh, Advocates, for UOI along with Sh. Poulose, Section Officer, DOPT. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 2007

Cattle Remedies and anr. Vs. Licensing Authority/Director of Ayurvedic ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-18-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1093

Protection) Act, 1999.(v) The Patents Act, 1970.(vi) The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights Act, 2001.(vii) The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000.(viii) The Trade Marks Act, 1999.I.P.Rs. are also dealt under two more areas namely, the trade secret and … State officials. The following points arise for determination.(i) What is the meaning of patent or proprietary medicines' under Section 3(h) of the Drugs Act?(ii) Whether the disputed drugs are 'patent or proprietary medicines' within the meaning of … University of London v. University of Tutorial Process Ltd. 1916 (2) Ch 601, observed:What is worth copying, is prima facie worth protecting.This is the genesis

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial