Advanced Search Results
Saurabh Bindal vs.union of India and Ors.
Delhi
Nov-26-2019
Land Acquisition
the following prayers: “(i) Pass a writ and/or any other order declaring Section 18(4) of the Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Layout Design Act, 2000 as violative of Article 14, 19(l)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and … following prayers: “(i) Pass a writ and/or any other order declaring Section 18(4) of the Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Layout Design Act, 2000 as violative of Article 14, 19(l)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and hence unconstitutional and therefore … HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h November, 2019 Through... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner SAURABH BINDAL + W.P.(C) 9793/2018 versus
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCattle Remedies and anr. Vs. Licensing Authority/Director of Ayurvedic ...
Allahabad
Jan-18-2007
Intellectual Property Rights
2007(2)AWC1093
Protection) Act, 1999.(v) The Patents Act, 1970.(vi) The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights Act, 2001.(vii) The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000.(viii) The Trade Marks Act, 1999.I.P.Rs. are also dealt under two more areas namely, the trade secret and … State officials. The following points arise for determination.(i) What is the meaning of patent or proprietary medicines' under Section 3(h) of the Drugs Act?(ii) Whether the disputed drugs are 'patent or proprietary medicines' within the meaning of … against these two orders.6. These two writ petitions were decided together on 27.11.2000. The Court held that:(i) There is no deemed licence in favour of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Alag Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Delhi
May-28-2015
Right to Information
HRD Div.2.4. Microelectronics initiative (2001): With a view to protect IPR in VLSI design, drafted Subordinate Legislation under “Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act 2000.” The same was vetted and notified by Law Ministry.21. The Cabinet Secretariat‟s note of 13.03.2009, after highlighting that … Sh. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Sh. Nitya Sharma and Sh. M.P. Singh, Advocates, for UOI along with Sh. Poulose, Section Officer, DOPT. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›