Advanced Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

unit at Dhanora has committed gross violation of the provisions of the mandate of the Seeds Act, 1966, Seeds Rules, 1968, Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 and the provisions 2 of the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale … (Control) Order, 1983 and the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale and Fixation of Sale Price) Rules, 2010 and that they are having licence for the storage and sale of such seeds in the State

Assam Seeds Corporation Limited Vs. Commissioner of Taxes and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 - Sections 9(1) and 36(2); Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3D(1); Excise Act; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(4A) and 2(11); Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 6, 14, 17, 17A, 17H, 21(3) and 23; Seeds Control Order, 1983; Seeds Act, 1996; Constitution of India - Article 141

drew our attention to the relevant provisions of the Seeds Act, 1966 (Act 54 of 1966) and the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). We have also perused the Schedule [sections 2(a) and (4-A)] to the … Mr. S. Saikia for the petitioner and Mr. D. Saikia, Standing Counsel, Sales Tax Department.2. The present civil rule has been preferred against both the order dated January 3, 1998 passed by the Superintendent of Taxes, Guwahati,

N. Somisetty Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : MRTP

("RRL" for short). While on deputation, he applied for the post of Assistant Administrative Officer in the National Seeds Corporation Ltd., New Delhi ("Corporation" for short). It was a Public Sector Undertaking ("PSU" for short) according to … fact, the appointment of the respondent in Bokaro Steel Plant cannot be regarded as absorption as contemplated in Rule 37 because the said appointment was not after obtaining the necessary permission from the Government. The respondent took the … effect from 14.9.1968 i.e., prior to 8.11.1968 and therefore, according to the rules in vogue the applicant was not eligible for any pro-rata pensionary benefits.11.

The State Government of Madhya Pradesh vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Seeds Act.” 13. It is also stated on behalf of respondent no.1 that Rule 3(c) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereafter „the Seeds Rules‟) indicates that one of the statutory functions of the Central Sub-Committee is to “send … other functions as are supplemental, incidental or consequential toany ofthe functions conferred by the Act or these rules.” 37. It is also relevant to note that the Central Seed Committee is a Committee constituted under the Seeds

Sri Rama Fertilizers and Depot Rep. by Its Proprietor and Others Vs. V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

advance from the farmers. They collected Rs. 200/- per packet as an advance contrary to Rule 10 of Seeds Rules, 1968. It is only Ops 1 and 2 that were jointly and severally liable to pay compensation, and therefore … laboratory……” 17) Subsequently in H.N. Shankara Sastry Vs. Assistant Director of Agriculture, Karnataka reported in II (2004) CPJ 37 (SC) the Supreme Court upheld the order of the Dist. Forum when it directed the manufacturer to refund

Vandana Shiva and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 73

Reported in : 1995(32)DRJ447

the question whether the right to arrest and detain a person under section 51 read with Order 21 rule 37 of Civil Procedure Code was vocative of Article Ii of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights … grounds of morality and public order and also in respect of rights of farmers including the right to seed as owners, producers, breeders and innovators etc. (2) LD. counsel for the petitioner Ms. Indira Jaising elaborated the … England, 'the courts have traditionally adopted the view that, as a general rule, neither the making of a treaty nor the performance of the obligations

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Gwalior Oil Mills

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1986]62STC299(MP)

is neither practicable, nor necessary for the assessee to keep two categories of raw material, i.e., the oil seeds separately and to maintain separate and distinct accounts with regard to the oil produced out of these two … really sales tax and should be allowed as business expenditure under Section 37. : [1978]3SCR98 :The burden of showing that the assessees utilised the goods … discharge of this obligation and particularly in view of Rule 52 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 (for short, hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules'), read with Section 26 of the Act, the assessee

Deputy Commissioner (C.T.) Vs. G. Govindaraju Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1980]46STC341(Mad)

Matched in: Advocate The Additional Government Pleader R.S. Venkatachari, Adv. in T.C. No. 118 of 1971, V. Nataraj, Adv. for ;King and ; Partridge, Advs. in T.C. No. 37 of 1972

Hyderabad Beverages Private Limited Etc. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6(2), 7, 7(1), 7(11), 8, 9A, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2A), 13(2B), 13(D), 13(2E), 13(2), 13(3), 13(5), 13(11), 15, 16, 16(1), 21(3) and 114; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 7, 19, 16(2), 14(1) and 15(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 21(1), 22, 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 30(1); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 2000; Central Insecticides Laboratory - Sections 24, 24(3) and 24(4); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 15(3), 15(4), 25, 25(3) and 25(4); Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 26, 33B and 33O; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 2 and 18A; Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921; Tenants Act - Sections 3 and 9; Indian Penal Co

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3988

necessary in such proceedings to produce any sample or part thereof taken for analysis.30. Rule 21 of the Seeds Rules, 1968 prescribes the duties of a Seed Analyst and reads as under:On receipt of a sample for analysis the … ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. Common questions arise for consideration in Criminal Petition Nos. 4325 of 2003, 3701 of 2004, 3856 of 2005, and 1007 of 2003, as to whether delay, in furnishing a copy of

Brooke Bond India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2 and 8(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 17 and 37

Reported in : 1984(3)ECC107; 1984(15)ELT32(AP)

the business of selling among other items 'Coffee-Chicory Mixture'. The activities of the petitioners consist of purchasing coffee seeds, roasting and grinding them and preparing coffee powder out of those seeds by mechanical process involving consumption of … fixed for different classes or description of the same article.' 6. Section 37 of the Act reads thus : '37. Power of Central Government to … is necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and the Rules made thereunder. The expressions 'Curing', 'Excisable goods', 'Factory' and 'Manufacture' are defined in Section 2 of the Act … relevant provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and the Rules made thereunder. The expressions 'Curing', 'Excisable goods', 'Factory' and 'Manufacture' are defined