Advanced Search Results

The State Government of Madhya Pradesh vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Seeds Act.” 13. It is also stated on behalf of respondent no.1 that Rule 3(c) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereafter „the Seeds Rules‟) indicates that one of the statutory functions of the Central Sub-Committee is to “send … the learned counsel for the petitioner, the legislative competence for enacting the Seeds Act is traceable to Entry 33 ofList IIIof the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. It is, perhaps, for this reason that the

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

unit at Dhanora has committed gross violation of the provisions of the mandate of the Seeds Act, 1966, Seeds Rules, 1968, Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 and the provisions 2 of the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale … (Control) Order, 1983 and the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale and Fixation of Sale Price) Rules, 2010 and that they are having licence for the storage and sale of such seeds in the State

Hyderabad Beverages Private Limited Etc. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6(2), 7, 7(1), 7(11), 8, 9A, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2A), 13(2B), 13(D), 13(2E), 13(2), 13(3), 13(5), 13(11), 15, 16, 16(1), 21(3) and 114; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 7, 19, 16(2), 14(1) and 15(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 21(1), 22, 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 30(1); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 2000; Central Insecticides Laboratory - Sections 24, 24(3) and 24(4); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 15(3), 15(4), 25, 25(3) and 25(4); Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 26, 33B and 33O; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 2 and 18A; Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921; Tenants Act - Sections 3 and 9; Indian Penal Co

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3988

necessary in such proceedings to produce any sample or part thereof taken for analysis.30. Rule 21 of the Seeds Rules, 1968 prescribes the duties of a Seed Analyst and reads as under:On receipt of a sample for analysis the … reports giving the result of analytical work done by him.31. Rule 24 prescribes the manner of taking samples. Rule 33 relates to the analysis of the sample. Rule 35 prescribes that the Form of the Analyst Report shall

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and ors. Vs. Pillibhit Pantnagar Beej Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 141; ;Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 2, 2(11), 3, 4, 4(2), 4A, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11(1), 12, 17, 25 and 40; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 3AAAA(4); ;Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 5, 6, 9(1), 14, 15, 17, 17A, 17II, 21(3) and 23; ;Seed Control Order, 1983; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Foodgrains Movement Restriction (Exemption of Seeds) Order, 1970; Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC605(SC); JT2003(9)SC548; 2003(10)SCALE43; (2004)1SCC391; (2004)1UPLBEC855

our attention to the relevant provisions of the Seeds Act, 1966 (Act No. 54 of 1966) and the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). We have also perused the Schedule (Sections 2(a) and 4-A) to the … governing seeds business:2.1 The seed industry for production and sale is regulated under the Seeds Act, 1966 and Rules and Seed Control Order, 1983. Under the seeds Act, the Government has made State Seed Certification Agencies who … the State Seed Certification Agency. (Rule 17)'18. A letter under Reference No. 3374/12-5-2001-600(88)/93 dated 7th January, 2002 sent by the Secretary, U.P. Government to the

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 20, 22, 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 27, 27A, 29, 31 and 33; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(6) to (8), 12, 13, 13(2), 14, 14A, 17, 17(2), 20 and 20A; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 19 and 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 16 (1AA), 42 and 319; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 25, 25(1), 27, 28, 28A, 28B, 29, 30 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 166; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 12B and 25; ;The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 3 and 45 ; ;Food Adulteration Rules

of huge increase in the offences taking place in relation to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Seeds Act 1966, The Insecticides Act 1968 and The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 966 and in the instant cases … State Government or the person authorized, no prosecution can be instituted.(H) Section 33 reads thus:Offences by companies - (1) Whenever an offence under this Act … in framing these laws, I have decided to deal with some of the provisions of these Acts and Rules with a view to throw light on all the above aspects.3. In Criminal Application Nos. 3439/06, 3440/06, 3442/06 … decided to deal with some of the provisions of these Acts and Rules with a view to throw light on all the above aspects.3. In

Diamond Vs. Diehr

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the first programmable digital computer. [ Footnote 2/2 ] It was 1968 before Page 450 U. S. 195 the federal courts squarely addressed the … Flook, 437 U. S. 584 (1978); Gottschalk v. Benson, supra at 409 U. S. 67 ; Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U. S. 127 , 333 U. S. 130 (1948). "An idea of … problem, also a full statement of a finite number of steps. 2. A defined process or set of rules that leads [ sic ] and assures development of a desired output from a given input. A sequence … a finite number of steps. 2. A defined process or set of rules that leads [ sic ] and assures development of a desired output … Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U. S. 127 , 333 U. S. 130

Second Income-tax Officer Vs. Nagpur Zilla Krishi Audhogik

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1982)2ITD138(Nag.)

it was claimed that the society was formed for the purpose of supplying to its members agricultural implements, seeds, livestock or other articles intended for agriculture, there was no express prohibition on selling these commodities and articles … item 23 (excluding refrac- tories) and items 24, 26, 27, 29 and 33 in the(b) in respect of such income by way of dividends other … : Provided that in the case of a co-operative society falling under Sub-clause (vi), or Sub-clause (vii), the rules and bye-laws of the society restrict the voting rights to the following classes of its members, namely :- … sales.However, he held that the guideline indicated by the Tribunal was a rule of convenience and could safely be adopted in evaluating the relief to

Devi Dass Gopal Krishan Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1973]31STC536(P& H)

revision, therefore, stood transferred to the Tribunal for disposal. The Tribunal dismissed the revision petition on 30th July, 1968. A contention was raised before the Tribunal by the assessee that the returns on form S.T. VIII-A filed … in person or to produce any evidence on which the dealer may rely in support of his returns. Rule 33 of the Rules prescribes the form in which the notice is to be issued by the appropriate authority.

indofil Chemical Company Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009(1)ShimLC284

second was handed over to the distributor/dealer on Forum No. XX under Rule 33 framed under the said Act and the third sample was sent … office of the Insecticide Inspector and second was handed over to the distributor/dealer on Forum No. XX under Rule 33 framed under the said Act and the third sample was sent to the Director, Regional Pesticides Laboratory, for … company sells its product throughout the country including the Himachal Pradesh through its distributors and retailers.3. 'M/s. K.D. Seed House', Shop No. 10, Zero Chowk Sunder Nagar, District Mandi (H.P.) is the authorised dealer/distributor of the petitioner … 16 October, 2006.Subject-Sanction of prosecution under Section 31 of the Insecticide Act 1968Memo:Reference your letter No. DDH (PP)(M)6-ll/05-6581 dated the 9th February, 2006, addressed to

Coromandel Indag Products India Ltd. vs Sumitomo Chemical Company Ltd. ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

SARL v. Kiran Jogani & Anr., CS(OS) 739 of 2003; 2004 (28) PTC 347 (Del.); Mahendra and Mahendra Seeds Pvt. Ltd. v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., MANU/GJ/0427/2002: AIR 2002 SC 117; Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. v. J.K. … be adduced at this stage as it would gravely prejudice the Defendants. Furthermore, he argued that Order XLI Rule 33 could not be invoked to circumvent the requirements of Order XLI Rule 27. It was also urged that … Vicky Kakkar44, observed as follows:“15.2.6 …This decision is of significance, as it rules, clearly, that a plaint must disclose material facts which give rise to