Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: seeds rules 1968 rule 32 · Page 1 of about 156 results (0.053 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 22 2019

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-22-2019

Subject : MRTP

unit at Dhanora has committed gross violation of the provisions of the mandate of the Seeds Act, 1966, Seeds Rules, 1968, Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 and the provisions 2 of the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale … (Control) Order, 1983 and the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale and Fixation of Sale Price) Rules, 2010 and that they are having licence for the storage and sale of such seeds in the State … appeal is allowed. [R. BANUMATHI]. ………………………..J.[A.S. BOPANNA]. ………………………..J.New Delhi; August 22, 2019 32

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2019

The State Government of Madhya Pradesh vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-25-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Seeds Act.” 13. It is also stated on behalf of respondent no.1 that Rule 3(c) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereafter „the Seeds Rules‟) indicates that one of the statutory functions of the Central Sub-Committee is to “send … 22 that it is determined by the seedcertification agency. that the genetic purity will not be significantly altered.” 32. As is apparent from Rule 14 of the Seeds Rules, certified seeds are produced from breeder seeds. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2005

Assam Seeds Corporation Limited Vs. Commissioner of Taxes and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-05-2005

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 - Sections 9(1) and 36(2); Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3D(1); Excise Act; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(4A) and 2(11); Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 6, 14, 17, 17A, 17H, 21(3) and 23; Seeds Control Order, 1983; Seeds Act, 1996; Constitution of India - Article 141

drew our attention to the relevant provisions of the Seeds Act, 1966 (Act 54 of 1966) and the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). We have also perused the Schedule [sections 2(a) and (4-A)] to the … Mr. S. Saikia for the petitioner and Mr. D. Saikia, Standing Counsel, Sales Tax Department.2. The present civil rule has been preferred against both the order dated January 3, 1998 passed by the Superintendent of Taxes, Guwahati,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 23 2024

Gene Campaign . Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2024

Subject : Education

have the right to save seed for sowing in the next season, which a patent-based regime of GM seeds will effectively deny. This choice is a fundamental right and must be retained as such for better farming … from the CIB&RC would attract appropriate legal action under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the Rules, 1971, made under the said Act Writ Petition (Civil) … Writ Petitions: ................................. 30 Constitution of the Technical Expert Committee (TEC): ....................................... 32 Final Report of TEC: ....................................................................................................... 34 Parliamentary Standing Committee (PSC) on Agriculture’s … Points for Consideration: ............................................................................................ 134 Legal Framework:......................................................................................................... 136 Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (EP Act, 1986): ............................................ 146 1989 Rules: .................................................................................................................... 147 Regulatory Framework: .............................................................................................. 156 Constitutional Court and the Environmental Rule of Law: ............................... 168 Public Trust

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2006

Hyderabad Beverages Private Limited Etc. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6(2), 7, 7(1), 7(11), 8, 9A, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2A), 13(2B), 13(D), 13(2E), 13(2), 13(3), 13(5), 13(11), 15, 16, 16(1), 21(3) and 114; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 7, 19, 16(2), 14(1) and 15(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 21(1), 22, 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 30(1); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 2000; Central Insecticides Laboratory - Sections 24, 24(3) and 24(4); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 15(3), 15(4), 25, 25(3) and 25(4); Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 26, 33B and 33O; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 2 and 18A; Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921; Tenants Act - Sections 3 and 9; Indian Penal Co

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3988

necessary in such proceedings to produce any sample or part thereof taken for analysis.30. Rule 21 of the Seeds Rules, 1968 prescribes the duties of a Seed Analyst and reads as under:On receipt of a sample for analysis the … that the contents of the bottle were required to be used within that period, that Explanation VIII under Rule 32 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules was attracted and that no useful purpose would be served if

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2003

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and ors. Vs. Pillibhit Pantnagar Beej Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-28-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 141; ;Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 2, 2(11), 3, 4, 4(2), 4A, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11(1), 12, 17, 25 and 40; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 3AAAA(4); ;Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 5, 6, 9(1), 14, 15, 17, 17A, 17II, 21(3) and 23; ;Seed Control Order, 1983; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Foodgrains Movement Restriction (Exemption of Seeds) Order, 1970; Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC605(SC); JT2003(9)SC548; 2003(10)SCALE43; (2004)1SCC391; (2004)1UPLBEC855

our attention to the relevant provisions of the Seeds Act, 1966 (Act No. 54 of 1966) and the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). We have also perused the Schedule (Sections 2(a) and 4-A) to the … governing seeds business:2.1 The seed industry for production and sale is regulated under the Seeds Act, 1966 and Rules and Seed Control Order, 1983. Under the seeds Act, the Government has made State Seed Certification Agencies who … Court. Aggrieved by the demands, the first respondent filed Writ Petition No. 32740 of 1998 against the order dated 22.9.1998. The writ petition was disposed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1999

Pilibhit Pant Nagar Beej Limited Vs. State of U. P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-25-1999

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 2 and 17; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 2(11) and 8; Seeds Rules, 1968; Seed Control Order

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3081

Adhiniyam has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.6. The Seeds Act, 1966 was enacted and the Seeds Rules, 1968 were made thereafter. Section 2(11) defines seeds and Section 8 provides for a Seed Certification Agency. The Seeds … has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.6. The Seeds Act, 1966 was enacted and the Seeds Rules, 1968 were made thereafter. Section 2(11) defines seeds and Section 8 provides for a Seed Certification Agency. The … dated 22.9.98 which was challenged by the petitioner in writ petition No. 32740 of 1998 which was disposed of by this Court on 15.1.99 (vide

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1992

Maharashtra State Co-operative Cotton Growers Marketing Federation Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-17-1992

Subject : PropertyOther Taxes

Acts : Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 2(28), 105(1) and 321; Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1968 - Rules 3, 14, 24, 25, 28 and 29; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960; Maharashtra Raw Cotton (Procurement, Processing and Marketing) Act, 1971 - Sections 42; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 286; Bombay Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1939

Reported in : AIR1992Bom498; (1992)94BOMLR397; 1992(2)MhLj1628

also gets the same processed by way of ginning and pressing, and, further sells the cotton bales, cotton seeds etc as envisaged under the said Act. 2. The respondents are the Municipal Councils duly constituted under the … under the proviso to S. 105(1) the State Government has framed rules known as the Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Octroi Rules). Under proviso to subsection (1) of S. 105 the State Government … collection and exemptions thereof shall be such as may be prescribed by rules.' The provisions of S. 32! of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act also vests

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2015

Bharat General and Textile Industries Limited Vs. Chief Officer, Munic ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Mar-09-2015

Subject : MRTP

the Council is required to pass necessary resolution under Rule 5. 10. The petitioner has been importing oil seeds of all kinds and it is not in dispute that those seeds imported by him for oil extraction … recover the octroi from it for goods falling under Item 4 of Chapter-I of the Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1968 [hereinafter referred to as, ‘the Octroi Rules]. Submission is the petitioner is entitled to concessional rate of 50% … Board turned around to contend that in terms of provisions of Section 32(v) (c) of the Payment of Bonus Act, its establishment was exempted from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2001

G.S. Prasad and ors. Vs. State Represented by the Assistant Director o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-2001

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Seeds Act, 1996 - Sections 13(2), 15, 15(3), 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 19; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rule 21 and 21(3); Seeds (Amendment) Rules, 1973; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 7(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)314; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)231

Sri V. Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per Rule 21 (3) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 as amended by the Seeds (Amendment) Rules, 1973 read with Section 15(2) of the Seeds Act, the Seed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial