Advanced Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

unit at Dhanora has committed gross violation of the provisions of the mandate of the Seeds Act, 1966, Seeds Rules, 1968, Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 and the provisions 2 of the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale … Dhanora unit and no licence was required for storage of seeds for 31 transportation is set aside. The finding of the High Court that the … (Control) Order, 1983 and the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale and Fixation of Sale Price) Rules, 2010 and that they are having licence for the storage and sale of such seeds in the State

The State Government of Madhya Pradesh vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Seeds Act.” 13. It is also stated on behalf of respondent no.1 that Rule 3(c) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereafter „the Seeds Rules‟) indicates that one of the statutory functions of the Central Sub-Committee is to “send … districts in the State of Madhya Pradesh should also be included in the GI for Basmati Rice. On 31.12.2013, the Registrar of Geographical Indications passed an order, inter alia, observing that APEDA had failed to satisfy the

G.S. Prasad and ors. Vs. State Represented by the Assistant Director o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Seeds Act, 1996 - Sections 13(2), 15, 15(3), 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 19; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rule 21 and 21(3); Seeds (Amendment) Rules, 1973; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 7(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)314; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)231

Sri V. Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per Rule 21 (3) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 as amended by the Seeds (Amendment) Rules, 1973 read with Section 15(2) of the Seeds Act, the Seed … a show cause notice to the Secretary, Agricultural Market Committee, Kothapeta Yard, Ravulapalem. The records were seized on 31-12-1999 in the presence of the mediators. Thereafter, the Seed Inspector submitted a report about the seizure of records

Hyderabad Beverages Private Limited Etc. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6(2), 7, 7(1), 7(11), 8, 9A, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2A), 13(2B), 13(D), 13(2E), 13(2), 13(3), 13(5), 13(11), 15, 16, 16(1), 21(3) and 114; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 7, 19, 16(2), 14(1) and 15(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 21(1), 22, 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 30(1); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 2000; Central Insecticides Laboratory - Sections 24, 24(3) and 24(4); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 15(3), 15(4), 25, 25(3) and 25(4); Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 26, 33B and 33O; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 2 and 18A; Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921; Tenants Act - Sections 3 and 9; Indian Penal Co

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3988

necessary in such proceedings to produce any sample or part thereof taken for analysis.30. Rule 21 of the Seeds Rules, 1968 prescribes the duties of a Seed Analyst and reads as under:On receipt of a sample for analysis the … case on hand, the Food Inspector collected the samples on 20.12.1995, the Public Analyst sent the report on 31.6.1996. A complaint came to be presented before the Magistrate on 6.5.1996. The Local (Health) Authority sent notice under

Omprakash Gulabchandji Partani Vs. Ashok and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR611; 1992CriLJ2704

of Maharashtra State, had lodged a prosecution against the applicant-accused and two others under Cl. 23(g) of the Seeds Rules, 1968, for contravention of S. 7 of the Seeds Act, 1966. The complaint case is filed in the Court … Maharashtra State, had lodged a prosecution against the applicant-accused and two others under Cl. 23(g) of the Seeds Rules, 1968, for contravention of S. 7 of the Seeds Act, 1966. The complaint case is filed in the … ORDER1. This revision application is preferred against the order dated 31-1-1991 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amravati, in Criminal Case No. 10/87,

Assam Seeds Corporation Limited Vs. Commissioner of Taxes and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 - Sections 9(1) and 36(2); Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3D(1); Excise Act; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(4A) and 2(11); Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 6, 14, 17, 17A, 17H, 21(3) and 23; Seeds Control Order, 1983; Seeds Act, 1996; Constitution of India - Article 141

drew our attention to the relevant provisions of the Seeds Act, 1966 (Act 54 of 1966) and the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). We have also perused the Schedule [sections 2(a) and (4-A)] to the … its forms except when sold as cooked food'. Effective up to December 31, 1999 (and with effect from October 7, 1999 as per entry 6 … Mr. S. Saikia for the petitioner and Mr. D. Saikia, Standing Counsel, Sales Tax Department.2. The present civil rule has been preferred against both the order dated January 3, 1998 passed by the Superintendent of Taxes, Guwahati,

Smt. Mallela Laxmi and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 7B, 16 and 19; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 7 and 8

Reported in : 2003CriLJ638

proceedings to produce any sample or part thereof taken for analysis.' 6. Rules 7 and 8 of the Seeds Rules, 1968 deal with the responsibility for marking or labelling and the contents of the mark or label respectively.7. The … shall not be necessary in such proceedings to produce any sample or part thereof taken for analysis.' 6. Rules 7 and 8 of the Seeds Rules, 1968 deal with the responsibility for marking or labelling and the … was retained with the Assistant Director of Agriculture for safe custody. On 31-7-2000 a report was sent by the Assistant Director, Agriculture (Seed Testing Laboratory),

Centuary Ecka Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1987]67STC103(Raj)

decisions started while interpreting Section 14(vi) of the Central Act which mentioned :(vi) Oil-seeds, that is to say, seeds yielding non-volatile oils used for human consumption, or in industry, or in the manufacture of varnishes, soaps and … list of goods given there at No. (iv), as it stood in 1968, was :(iv) Iron and steel, that is to say,-(a) pig iron and … consider the powers of the Provincial Legislature to legislate under entry No. 31 in List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Government of India … to act as an assessing authority by any valid order under Rule 3 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Rules, 1955; (2) that the notices of reassessment having been issued after a lapse of more than 4 years

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 20, 22, 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 27, 27A, 29, 31 and 33; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(6) to (8), 12, 13, 13(2), 14, 14A, 17, 17(2), 20 and 20A; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 19 and 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 16 (1AA), 42 and 319; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 25, 25(1), 27, 28, 28A, 28B, 29, 30 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 166; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 12B and 25; ;The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 3 and 45 ; ;Food Adulteration Rules

of huge increase in the offences taking place in relation to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Seeds Act 1966, The Insecticides Act 1968 and The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 966 and in the instant cases … in framing these laws, I have decided to deal with some of the provisions of these Acts and Rules with a view to throw light on all the above aspects.3. In Criminal Application Nos. 3439/06, 3440/06, 3442/06 … decided to deal with some of the provisions of these Acts and Rules with a view to throw light on all the above aspects.3. In … of 2009, so also the tenability of Criminal Case Nos. 393/2000, 81/1999, 31/1999, 5/1999, 18/2000, 463/2007 and 10 of 1999.2. In view of huge increase

Pilibhit Pant Nagar Beej Limited Vs. State of U. P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 2 and 17; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 2(11) and 8; Seeds Rules, 1968; Seed Control Order

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3081

Adhiniyam has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.6. The Seeds Act, 1966 was enacted and the Seeds Rules, 1968 were made thereafter. Section 2(11) defines seeds and Section 8 provides for a Seed Certification Agency. The Seeds … has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.6. The Seeds Act, 1966 was enacted and the Seeds Rules, 1968 were made thereafter. Section 2(11) defines seeds and Section 8 provides for a Seed Certification Agency. The … means of Writ Petition No. 13799 of 1988 which was allowed on 31.8.88 by this Court which held that the certified seeds are not specified