Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: seeds rules 1968 rule 28 · Page 1 of about 214 results (0.023 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 22 2019

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-22-2019

Subject : MRTP

unit at Dhanora has committed gross violation of the provisions of the mandate of the Seeds Act, 1966, Seeds Rules, 1968, Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 and the provisions 2 of the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale … to seal the place is deemed to be vested with the Seed 28 Inspector in terms of Section 14(1)(e) of the Seeds Act which empowers … (Control) Order, 1983 and the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale and Fixation of Sale Price) Rules, 2010 and that they are having licence for the storage and sale of such seeds in the State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1991

Omprakash Gulabchandji Partani Vs. Ashok and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-01-1991

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR611; 1992CriLJ2704

of Maharashtra State, had lodged a prosecution against the applicant-accused and two others under Cl. 23(g) of the Seeds Rules, 1968, for contravention of S. 7 of the Seeds Act, 1966. The complaint case is filed in the Court … Maharashtra State, had lodged a prosecution against the applicant-accused and two others under Cl. 23(g) of the Seeds Rules, 1968, for contravention of S. 7 of the Seeds Act, 1966. The complaint case is filed in the … complainant/respondent Seeds Inspector received the report of the Seeds Testing Laboratory on 28-7-1986. After receipt of the report of analyst, the respondent/complainant filed the complaint

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2006

Hyderabad Beverages Private Limited Etc. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6(2), 7, 7(1), 7(11), 8, 9A, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2A), 13(2B), 13(D), 13(2E), 13(2), 13(3), 13(5), 13(11), 15, 16, 16(1), 21(3) and 114; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 7, 19, 16(2), 14(1) and 15(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 21(1), 22, 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 30(1); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 2000; Central Insecticides Laboratory - Sections 24, 24(3) and 24(4); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 15(3), 15(4), 25, 25(3) and 25(4); Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 26, 33B and 33O; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 2 and 18A; Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921; Tenants Act - Sections 3 and 9; Indian Penal Co

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3988

necessary in such proceedings to produce any sample or part thereof taken for analysis.30. Rule 21 of the Seeds Rules, 1968 prescribes the duties of a Seed Analyst and reads as under:On receipt of a sample for analysis the … 1999CriLJ1125 ; Matha Venkateswara Rao v. State of A.P. 2002 (1) ALD (Cri) 592 : 2002 Cri LJ 2891; Mallella Laxmi v. State of Andhra Pradesh 2003 (1) ALT (Cri) 67 : 2003 Cri LJ 638; Gupta

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 25 2019

The State Government of Madhya Pradesh vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-25-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Seeds Act.” 13. It is also stated on behalf of respondent no.1 that Rule 3(c) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereafter „the Seeds Rules‟) indicates that one of the statutory functions of the Central Sub-Committee is to “send

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2010

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-21-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 20, 22, 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 27, 27A, 29, 31 and 33; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(6) to (8), 12, 13, 13(2), 14, 14A, 17, 17(2), 20 and 20A; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 19 and 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 16 (1AA), 42 and 319; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 25, 25(1), 27, 28, 28A, 28B, 29, 30 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 166; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 12B and 25; ;The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 3 and 45 ; ;Food Adulteration Rules

of huge increase in the offences taking place in relation to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Seeds Act 1966, The Insecticides Act 1968 and The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 966 and in the instant cases … in framing these laws, I have decided to deal with some of the provisions of these Acts and Rules with a view to throw light on all the above aspects.3. In Criminal Application Nos. 3439/06, 3440/06, 3442/06 … decided to deal with some of the provisions of these Acts and Rules with a view to throw light on all the above aspects.3. In … till 30.4.1998 when he sent proposal for consent which he received on 28.12.1998. Thus the Joint Commissioner wasted eight months for giving consent unmindful of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2005

Assam Seeds Corporation Limited Vs. Commissioner of Taxes and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-05-2005

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 - Sections 9(1) and 36(2); Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3D(1); Excise Act; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(4A) and 2(11); Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 6, 14, 17, 17A, 17H, 21(3) and 23; Seeds Control Order, 1983; Seeds Act, 1996; Constitution of India - Article 141

drew our attention to the relevant provisions of the Seeds Act, 1966 (Act 54 of 1966) and the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). We have also perused the Schedule [sections 2(a) and (4-A)] to the … In Commissioner of Commercial Taxes v. India Sewai Co. [1980] 45 STC 28, the Patna High Court interpreted the words 'cereals and pulses including all … Mr. S. Saikia for the petitioner and Mr. D. Saikia, Standing Counsel, Sales Tax Department.2. The present civil rule has been preferred against both the order dated January 3, 1998 passed by the Superintendent of Taxes, Guwahati,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2002

Smt. Mallela Laxmi and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-25-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 7B, 16 and 19; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 7 and 8

Reported in : 2003CriLJ638

proceedings to produce any sample or part thereof taken for analysis.' 6. Rules 7 and 8 of the Seeds Rules, 1968 deal with the responsibility for marking or labelling and the contents of the mark or label respectively.7. The … shall not be necessary in such proceedings to produce any sample or part thereof taken for analysis.' 6. Rules 7 and 8 of the Seeds Rules, 1968 deal with the responsibility for marking or labelling and the … has been lost as the shelf life of the seed expired on 28-2-2001 and hence prejudice is caused.4. Learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1984

JaIn Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-20-1984

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111

Reported in : 1987(29)ELT753(Del); ILR1985Delhi164

in Item 8 Appendix 10 (1978-79). Similarly for 1978-79 entry No. 8 Clause 3 is of soyabean oil seeds and edible variety is under Ogl (Appendix 10) while for industrial purposes soyabean oil is also included at … Metal Corporation. Madras 1972 Sc 935. In that case appellant applied in 1968 for license for stainless steel in December, 1968. But by the time … helpful if Anand, J. was also with us, as he has passed a detailed referring Order. Indeed,the statutory Rules and Order of the Punjab High Court,Vol, V. as applicable to Delhi High Court, make the following provision … of the Act is absolute. There is no scope for importing the rule of means read at all. Either goods are prohibited or not. If … up-held bya special board of Central Customs dated 28-5-82 wherein it noted that the Central Government had

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2003

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and ors. Vs. Pillibhit Pantnagar Beej Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-28-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 141; ;Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 2, 2(11), 3, 4, 4(2), 4A, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11(1), 12, 17, 25 and 40; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 3AAAA(4); ;Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 5, 6, 9(1), 14, 15, 17, 17A, 17II, 21(3) and 23; ;Seed Control Order, 1983; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Foodgrains Movement Restriction (Exemption of Seeds) Order, 1970; Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC605(SC); JT2003(9)SC548; 2003(10)SCALE43; (2004)1SCC391; (2004)1UPLBEC855

our attention to the relevant provisions of the Seeds Act, 1966 (Act No. 54 of 1966) and the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). We have also perused the Schedule (Sections 2(a) and 4-A) to the … governing seeds business:2.1 The seed industry for production and sale is regulated under the Seeds Act, 1966 and Rules and Seed Control Order, 1983. Under the seeds Act, the Government has made State Seed Certification Agencies who

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1992

Maharashtra State Co-operative Cotton Growers Marketing Federation Ltd ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-17-1992

Subject : PropertyOther Taxes

Acts : Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 2(28), 105(1) and 321; Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1968 - Rules 3, 14, 24, 25, 28 and 29; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960; Maharashtra Raw Cotton (Procurement, Processing and Marketing) Act, 1971 - Sections 42; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 286; Bombay Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1939

Reported in : AIR1992Bom498; (1992)94BOMLR397; 1992(2)MhLj1628

way of ginning and pressing, and, further sells the cotton bales, cotton seeds etc as envisaged under the said Act. 2. The respondents are the … under the proviso to S. 105(1) the State Government has framed rules known as the Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the Octroi Rules). Under proviso to subsection (1) of S. 105 the State Government … of which to the Octroi Officer at exit Naka the goods are to pass beyond the octroi limits. Rule 28 makes a provision for refund of deposit paid under sub-rule 24 at the time of the import on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial