Advanced Search Results

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and ors. Vs. Pillibhit Pantnagar Beej Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 141; ;Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 2, 2(11), 3, 4, 4(2), 4A, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11(1), 12, 17, 25 and 40; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 3AAAA(4); ;Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 5, 6, 9(1), 14, 15, 17, 17A, 17II, 21(3) and 23; ;Seed Control Order, 1983; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Foodgrains Movement Restriction (Exemption of Seeds) Order, 1970; Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC605(SC); JT2003(9)SC548; 2003(10)SCALE43; (2004)1SCC391; (2004)1UPLBEC855

our attention to the relevant provisions of the Seeds Act, 1966 (Act No. 54 of 1966) and the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). We have also perused the Schedule (Sections 2(a) and 4-A) to the … governing seeds business:2.1 The seed industry for production and sale is regulated under the Seeds Act, 1966 and Rules and Seed Control Order, 1983. Under the seeds Act, the Government has made State Seed Certification Agencies who … respondent filed Writ Petition No. 32740 of 1998 against the order dated 22.9.1998. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the first

Shakthi Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commnr. (Ct) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 9, 9(1) and 22(1); Central Sales Tax Act; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 9; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 2 and 7

Reported in : JT2007(9)SC288; 2007(8)SCALE431; (2007)6SCC176; (2007)7VST769(SC)

basis overlooking the clarificatory memorandum - Appeal allowed - SEEDS ACT, 1966 [54 of 1966]. Section 9 & Seeds Rules, 1968, Rule 7: [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ] Exemption of Sales Tax on seeds under A.P. General … Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissing the Revision Petition filed by the appellant under Section 22(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (in short the 'Act'). Before the High Court challenge

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

unit at Dhanora has committed gross violation of the provisions of the mandate of the Seeds Act, 1966, Seeds Rules, 1968, Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 and the provisions 2 of the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale … (Control) Order, 1983 and the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale and Fixation of Sale Price) Rules, 2010 and that they are having licence for the storage and sale of such seeds in the State … Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench. The High Court vide interim order dated 22.12.2017 directed the appellant-authorities to open the sealed godown after taking a prima

The State Government of Madhya Pradesh vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Seeds Act.” 13. It is also stated on behalf of respondent no.1 that Rule 3(c) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereafter „the Seeds Rules‟) indicates that one of the statutory functions of the Central Sub-Committee is to “send … (hereafter referred to as “impugned letter”) issued by respondent no.1 (Ministry of Agriculture). W.P.(C) 11704/2016 Page 1 of 22 2. By OM-I, respondent no.1 has set forth the standards of the “Basmati” variety of rice. Apart from

G.S. Prasad and ors. Vs. State Represented by the Assistant Director o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Seeds Act, 1996 - Sections 13(2), 15, 15(3), 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 19; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 24; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rule 21 and 21(3); Seeds (Amendment) Rules, 1973; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 7(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)314; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)231

Sri V. Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per Rule 21 (3) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 as amended by the Seeds (Amendment) Rules, 1973 read with Section 15(2) of the Seeds Act, the Seed … learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothapeta for safe custody of seized records and sought appropriate orders.7. On 22-1-2000, the Joint Director of Agriculture, Kakinada instructed the Assistant Director of Agriculture (R), Kothapeta to submit prosecution proposals

Hyderabad Beverages Private Limited Etc. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6(2), 7, 7(1), 7(11), 8, 9A, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2A), 13(2B), 13(D), 13(2E), 13(2), 13(3), 13(5), 13(11), 15, 16, 16(1), 21(3) and 114; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 7, 19, 16(2), 14(1) and 15(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 21(1), 22, 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 30(1); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 2000; Central Insecticides Laboratory - Sections 24, 24(3) and 24(4); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 15(3), 15(4), 25, 25(3) and 25(4); Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 26, 33B and 33O; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 2 and 18A; Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921; Tenants Act - Sections 3 and 9; Indian Penal Co

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3988

necessary in such proceedings to produce any sample or part thereof taken for analysis.30. Rule 21 of the Seeds Rules, 1968 prescribes the duties of a Seed Analyst and reads as under:On receipt of a sample for analysis the … a label a warranty in Form VIA. Rule 14 prescribes the mariner of sending the sample for analysis. Rule 22 relates to the quantity of the sample.19. As noted above Appendix A contains the forms. Form II is

Pilibhit Pant Nagar Beej Limited Vs. State of U. P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 2 and 17; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 2(11) and 8; Seeds Rules, 1968; Seed Control Order

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3081

Adhiniyam has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.6. The Seeds Act, 1966 was enacted and the Seeds Rules, 1968 were made thereafter. Section 2(11) defines seeds and Section 8 provides for a Seed Certification Agency. The Seeds … has been annexed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.6. The Seeds Act, 1966 was enacted and the Seeds Rules, 1968 were made thereafter. Section 2(11) defines seeds and Section 8 provides for a Seed Certification Agency. The … was demanded from the petitioner on seeds of wheat by order dated 22.9.98 which was challenged by the petitioner in writ petition No. 32740 of

Assam Seeds Corporation Limited Vs. Commissioner of Taxes and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 - Sections 9(1) and 36(2); Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3D(1); Excise Act; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(4A) and 2(11); Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 6, 14, 17, 17A, 17H, 21(3) and 23; Seeds Control Order, 1983; Seeds Act, 1996; Constitution of India - Article 141

drew our attention to the relevant provisions of the Seeds Act, 1966 (Act 54 of 1966) and the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). We have also perused the Schedule [sections 2(a) and (4-A)] to the … Mr. S. Saikia for the petitioner and Mr. D. Saikia, Standing Counsel, Sales Tax Department.2. The present civil rule has been preferred against both the order dated January 3, 1998 passed by the Superintendent of Taxes, Guwahati,

Gene Campaign . Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

have the right to save seed for sowing in the next season, which a patent-based regime of GM seeds will effectively deny. This choice is a fundamental right and must be retained as such for better farming … from the CIB&RC would attract appropriate legal action under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the Rules, 1971, made under the said Act Writ Petition (Civil) … Points for Consideration: ............................................................................................ 134 Legal Framework:......................................................................................................... 136 Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (EP Act, 1986): ............................................ 146 1989 Rules: .................................................................................................................... 147 Regulatory Framework: .............................................................................................. 156 Constitutional Court and the Environmental Rule of Law: ............................... 168 Public Trust … violates the right to safe and healthy environment under Article 21?. ....................................................................................................................... 221 Right to safe and healthy Environment: ................................................................ 221 Re: Point No.3: Whether

The State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Shakti Cotton Company and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 5(2) and 14

Reported in : AIR1972SC1458; (1972)1SCC88; [1972]2SCR289; [1972]29STC706(SC)

Amongst its other business, the firm purchases kapas or unginned cotton and after ginning, sells cotton and cotton seeds. For the assessment year 1961-62, the firm submitted a return under the Act showing its gross turnover of … (hereinafter to be referred as the Act). Civil Appeals Nos. 2320 of 1968 and 1468 of 1969 relate to the assessment years 1960-61; Civil Appeals … on April 1, 1960. Even here we may say that the entire scheme of the Act and the Rules as well as of the Central Act has been elaborately considered by this Court in Bhawani Cotton Mills … we may say that the entire scheme of the Act and the Rules as well as of the Central Act has been elaborately considered by … High Court and hence its jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution was invoked.4. The