Advanced Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

unit at Dhanora has committed gross violation of the provisions of the mandate of the Seeds Act, 1966, Seeds Rules, 1968, Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 and the provisions 2 of the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale … (Control) Order, 1983 and the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale and Fixation of Sale Price) Rules, 2010 and that they are having licence for the storage and sale of such seeds in the State … and the police informed the concerned authorities of the agricultural department. On 09.12.2017, the Seed Inspector inspected the respondent’s godown at Dhanora and noticed huge

The State Government of Madhya Pradesh vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Seeds Act.” 13. It is also stated on behalf of respondent no.1 that Rule 3(c) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereafter „the Seeds Rules‟) indicates that one of the statutory functions of the Central Sub-Committee is to “send

Gene Campaign . Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

have the right to save seed for sowing in the next season, which a patent-based regime of GM seeds will effectively deny. This choice is a fundamental right and must be retained as such for better farming … from the CIB&RC would attract appropriate legal action under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the Rules, 1971, made under the said Act Writ Petition (Civil) … Points for Consideration: ............................................................................................ 134 Legal Framework:......................................................................................................... 136 Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (EP Act, 1986): ............................................ 146 1989 Rules: .................................................................................................................... 147 Regulatory Framework: .............................................................................................. 156 Constitutional Court and the Environmental Rule of Law: ............................... 168 Public Trust … open field trials.10.3 Thereafter, an order was passed by this Court on 09.11.2012 recording the filing of an interim report dated 07.12.2012 and the objections

National Seed Association of India and Others Vs. the State of Maharas ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : MRTP

that certain provisions of the Seeds Act are applicable only on the seeds notified under the said Act.1968 :Seeds Rules are notified under the provisions of the Seeds Act.December, 1983 :In exercise of the powers conferred under Section … the present case, if the petition succeeds appropriate orders in this regard will be passed; however since the rule is made returnable on 20.08.2008, we are not inclined to stay the effect and operation of the impugned … Sale Price) Ordinance, 2009 (the Ordinance) (published in the official Gazette on 09.05.2009) and the notification dated 10.05.2009 fixing the prices of BGI and BGII

Madras Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(1), 10(2), 28, 33, 34, 35D, 35D(2), 37, 37(1), 43, 43A, 80J and 80J(2A); Income Tax Rules, 1961 - Rule 19A

Reported in : [1994]209ITR174(Mad)

and promotional expenses' during the years 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70 and prior to March 31, 1970 : Rs.1. Seeding programme expenses 12,09,7872. Expenses under technical assistance agreement 8,37,0183. Establishment expenses 6,61,0954. Advertisement and sales promotion expenses 7,37,7235. … Bank, New York, and Rs. 29,48,00,000 borrowed from the Government of India, applying rule 19A of the Income-tax Rules. On appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner confirmed the order passed by the Income-tax Officer. On further appeal, the

Vishwas and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra Represented by the See ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

referred as the 'Act' for the sake of brevity] and Rule 2 (g), 7 and 10 of the seeds Rules, 1968 [hereinafter referred as the 'Rules' for the sake of brevity]. 3. Facts giving rise to the present Writ … Date of Test – 27 July, 2010 4. Validity up to – 26 April, 2011 5. Stock - 09 6. Name of manufacturer – Maharashtra Hybrids Seeds Co. Ltd., B4, Old Industrial Estate, Jalna 431 203 (MHA).

Vijay Kumar Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 342; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 16(1)

Reported in : AIR1974SC687; 1974CriLJ615; (1974)3SCC769; [1974]2SCR701

argument overlooks that on the relevant date. Rule A.05.09 of the Rules then in force provided that the seeds of Badi Elachi shall not contain Jess than 1 per cent of volatile essential oil. The new Rule … Vijay Kumar, runs a sweet meat shop in a village called Baba Bakala in Punjab. On June 10, 1968 the Food Inspector, Amritsar, took a sample from the Elachi Dana which was kept for sale by the

Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Sitaram Badrilal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1986]61STC258(Raj); 1985(1)WLN628

difference between cotton in the field and cotton at the gin or in the bale or between cotton seed in the field and cotton seed at the gin, than between a chicken in the pen and one … Favour of Assessee - Section 2(k), 2(1), 7 & 40 & Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007, Rule 12 & 98 & Juvenile Justice Act, 1986, Section 2(h): [Altamas Kabir & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] … Act, 1954 (for short 'the Act'), for the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69, vide his assessment order dated 6th May, 1969. The dealer-assessee was dealing

Chittarmal Ram Dayal Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1983]52STC18(All)

The department cannot be concerned with goods manufactured out of raw material purchased otherwise. The Act or the Rules do not restrict an assessee holding a recognition certificate from carrying on business otherwise. The anxiety should be … The department cannot be concerned with goods manufactured out of raw material purchased otherwise. The Act or the Rules do not restrict an assessee holding a recognition certificate from carrying on business otherwise. The anxiety should be

Binayak Sabatho and Sons Vs. Municipal Council, Berhampur and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 - Sections 131(1)

Reported in : AIR1985Ori263

does this entry also cover groundnuts if and when they are imported not as edibles but as oil seeds. I must confess the difficulty or the doubt that has been raised is due to the fact that … indicated in Annexure B to the plaint ranging from 18-7-1963 to June, 1968. 3. Two sets of written statements were filed - one by defendants … was also found that the levy in question was enforced after due notification and publication as contemplated under Rules 601 and 602 of the Orissa Municipal Rules. On issue No. 3, the learned Subordinate Judge came to … in question was enforced after due notification and publication as contemplated under Rules 601 and 602 of the Orissa Municipal Rules. On issue No. 3,