Advanced Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

unit at Dhanora has committed gross violation of the provisions of the mandate of the Seeds Act, 1966, Seeds Rules, 1968, Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 and the provisions 2 of the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale … (Control) Order, 1983 and the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale and Fixation of Sale Price) Rules, 2010 and that they are having licence for the storage and sale of such seeds in the State … seeds at godown located at Dhanora. The respondent’s godown was sealed by 07:00 pm on 15.12.2017 after giving sufficient opportunity. In such facts and circumstances

The State Government of Madhya Pradesh vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Seeds Act.” 13. It is also stated on behalf of respondent no.1 that Rule 3(c) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereafter „the Seeds Rules‟) indicates that one of the statutory functions of the Central Sub-Committee is to “send … the Constitution of India,impugning the Office Memorandum dated 29.05.2008 (hereafter referred to as “OM-I”), Office Memorandum No.3-35/2014-SD-IV dated 07.02.2014 (hereafter referred to as “OM-II”) and letter dated 05.05.2016 (hereafter referred to as “impugned letter”) issued by respondent

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and ors. Vs. Pillibhit Pantnagar Beej Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 141; ;Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 2, 2(11), 3, 4, 4(2), 4A, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11(1), 12, 17, 25 and 40; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 3AAAA(4); ;Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 5, 6, 9(1), 14, 15, 17, 17A, 17II, 21(3) and 23; ;Seed Control Order, 1983; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Foodgrains Movement Restriction (Exemption of Seeds) Order, 1970; Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC605(SC); JT2003(9)SC548; 2003(10)SCALE43; (2004)1SCC391; (2004)1UPLBEC855

our attention to the relevant provisions of the Seeds Act, 1966 (Act No. 54 of 1966) and the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). We have also perused the Schedule (Sections 2(a) and 4-A) to the … : Dr. Naseem Jedi,Secretary,U.P. GovernmentTo : DirectorMandi ParishadU.P. LucknowKrishi Anubhag-5 Lucknow: Dated 07 January, 2002Sub:-Exemption of certified seeds by Trade Tax Department and accordingly exemption … governing seeds business:2.1 The seed industry for production and sale is regulated under the Seeds Act, 1966 and Rules and Seed Control Order, 1983. Under the seeds Act, the Government has made State Seed Certification Agencies who

Gene Campaign . Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

have the right to save seed for sowing in the next season, which a patent-based regime of GM seeds will effectively deny. This choice is a fundamental right and must be retained as such for better farming … from the CIB&RC would attract appropriate legal action under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the Rules, 1971, made under the said Act Writ Petition (Civil) … Points for Consideration: ............................................................................................ 134 Legal Framework:......................................................................................................... 136 Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (EP Act, 1986): ............................................ 146 1989 Rules: .................................................................................................................... 147 Regulatory Framework: .............................................................................................. 156 Constitutional Court and the Environmental Rule of Law: ............................... 168 Public Trust … was deliberately not disclosed on the website for public scrutiny. 8.9 On 07.09.2016, Dr. Bhargava, a member of GEAC, made a startling revelation. He stated

National Seed Association of India and Others Vs. the State of Maharas ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : MRTP

that certain provisions of the Seeds Act are applicable only on the seeds notified under the said Act.1968 :Seeds Rules are notified under the provisions of the Seeds Act.December, 1983 :In exercise of the powers conferred under Section … the present case, if the petition succeeds appropriate orders in this regard will be passed; however since the rule is made returnable on 20.08.2008, we are not inclined to stay the effect and operation of the impugned

Managing Director Mahyco Seeds Limited and Others Vs. State of Maharas ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

1231 of 2007 filed against the applicant by the State-respondent under Rules 19 and 23 (g) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 for contravention of the provisions of Section 6(a) and 7(b) of the Seeds Act, 1966.4. It has been … aside of criminal case bearing S.T.C. No. 1231 of 2007 filed against the applicant by the State-respondent under Rules 19 and 23 (g) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 for contravention of the provisions of Section 6(a) and … of the seeds was 19/11/2006, but the prosecution has been filed on 07/4/2007 and as such, learned Counsel for the applicants further submits, important right

M/S. Suttind Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S. Sutton and Sons India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Order 39 Rule 1, ; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act - Section 28(1)

its directors etc. from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising directly and indirectly dealing in vegetable and flower seeds bearing the trade mark "SUTTON SEEDS" within parallelogram as and/or any other trade mark, as may be identical … be reported in the Digest? Yes 1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as CPC) read … It started its business in Calcutta about 100 years back. Since in 1968-69 there was a change of law with regard to foreign exchange regulations, … 1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Sakthi Sugars Limited and ors. Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer and o ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1969]23STC232(Mad)

seed is very small, rather silky and rarely viable-See Van Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopaedia. It is said that sugar-cane seeds are so small that nearly 100 sugar-cane seeds would be required to equal the weight of a single … First Schedule to the Act.2. In W.Ps. Nos. 1043 and 1044 of 1968 the petitioner is seeking a rule for the issue of a writ of prohibition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India restraining the

Leary Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

inspector asked them to alight, examined the interior of the car, and saw what appeared to be marihuana seeds on the floor. The inspector then received permission to search the car and passengers. Small amounts of marihuana … U.S. 6 (1969) Leary v. United States No. 65 Argued December 11-12, 1968 Decided May 19, 1969 395 U.S. 6 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES … 319 U. S. 463 (1943), the Court singled out one of these tests as controlling, and the Tot rule has been adhered to in the two subsequent cases in which the issue has been presented. The Tot

Vishwas and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra Represented by the See ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

referred as the 'Act' for the sake of brevity] and Rule 2 (g), 7 and 10 of the seeds Rules, 1968 [hereinafter referred as the 'Rules' for the sake of brevity]. 3. Facts giving rise to the present Writ