Advanced Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

unit at Dhanora has committed gross violation of the provisions of the mandate of the Seeds Act, 1966, Seeds Rules, 1968, Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 and the provisions 2 of the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale … (Control) Order, 1983 and the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale and Fixation of Sale Price) Rules, 2010 and that they are having licence for the storage and sale of such seeds in the State

Gene Campaign . Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

have the right to save seed for sowing in the next season, which a patent-based regime of GM seeds will effectively deny. This choice is a fundamental right and must be retained as such for better farming … from the CIB&RC would attract appropriate legal action under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the Rules, 1971, made under the said Act Writ Petition (Civil) … Points for Consideration: ............................................................................................ 134 Legal Framework:......................................................................................................... 136 Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (EP Act, 1986): ............................................ 146 1989 Rules: .................................................................................................................... 147 Regulatory Framework: .............................................................................................. 156 Constitutional Court and the Environmental Rule of Law: ............................... 168 Public Trust

The State Government of Madhya Pradesh vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Seeds Act.” 13. It is also stated on behalf of respondent no.1 that Rule 3(c) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereafter „the Seeds Rules‟) indicates that one of the statutory functions of the Central Sub-Committee is to “send … the Intellectual Property Rights in relation to Basmati rice.7. Respondent no.1 has issued notifications (three in number) dated 06.11.1989, 05.11.2005 and 20.07.2007, declaring various Basmati varieties of seedsas notified varieties for the whole of India.8. On 26.11.2008,

National Seed Association of India and Others Vs. the State of Maharas ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : MRTP

that certain provisions of the Seeds Act are applicable only on the seeds notified under the said Act.1968 :Seeds Rules are notified under the provisions of the Seeds Act.December, 1983 :In exercise of the powers conferred under Section … the present case, if the petition succeeds appropriate orders in this regard will be passed; however since the rule is made returnable on 20.08.2008, we are not inclined to stay the effect and operation of the impugned

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 20, 22, 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 27, 27A, 29, 31 and 33; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(6) to (8), 12, 13, 13(2), 14, 14A, 17, 17(2), 20 and 20A; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 19 and 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 16 (1AA), 42 and 319; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 25, 25(1), 27, 28, 28A, 28B, 29, 30 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 166; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 12B and 25; ;The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 3 and 45 ; ;Food Adulteration Rules

of huge increase in the offences taking place in relation to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Seeds Act 1966, The Insecticides Act 1968 and The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 966 and in the instant cases … in framing these laws, I have decided to deal with some of the provisions of these Acts and Rules with a view to throw light on all the above aspects.3. In Criminal Application Nos. 3439/06, 3440/06, 3442/06 … decided to deal with some of the provisions of these Acts and Rules with a view to throw light on all the above aspects.3. In

Santosh Kumar Datta Vs. Chairman, Sapatgram Small Town Committed and a ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

prescribed and it is as below:A.17.06 Mustard Oil (Sarsonkatel) means the oil expressed from clean and sound mustard seeds, belonging to the compestris. juncea or napus varieties of brassica. It shall be clear, free from rancidity, suspended, … the limit prescribed for mustard oil in Item 17.06 of Appendix 'B' to the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 (hereinafter called the Rules). On the basis of the report of the Public Analyst the petitioner was … in Item 17.06 of Appendix 'B' to the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 (hereinafter called the Rules). On the basis of the report of

Deputy Commissioner (C.T.) Vs. G. Govindaraju Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1980]46STC341(Mad)

only have been made under Section 4-A read with Rule 23 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules. Any order under Section 4-A is also subject to an appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and thereafter

Milak Brothers Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 130E; Exports Control Order, 1968; Agricultural Produce Cess Act, 1940; Punjab Sales Tax Act; Tariff Act, 1934; Customs Tariff Act, 1975;

Reported in : AIR1990SC2256; 1991(31)ECC198; 1991(51)ELT204(SC); JT1990(4)SC508; 1990(2)SCALE727; 1991Supp(1)SCC71; [1990]Supp2SCR141; 1991(1)LC193(SC)

This separates the skin of the groundnut and on removal of the skin it becomes white. Thereafter, the seeds are put on running tables and picked, according to uniform sizes, with the aid of an electric eye … groundnut kernels', does not fall within the purview of Exports Control Order, 1968 and its export is allowed without any licensing formalities.(6) It has been … not come to an end. [105C]. Rule 19 of the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Rules, 1961 framed under the Act provides that where a tenure-holder dies before the publication of the general notice

Leary Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

inspector asked them to alight, examined the interior of the car, and saw what appeared to be marihuana seeds on the floor. The inspector then received permission to search the car and passengers. Small amounts of marihuana … U.S. 6 (1969) Leary v. United States No. 65 Argued December 11-12, 1968 Decided May 19, 1969 395 U.S. 6 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES … 319 U. S. 463 (1943), the Court singled out one of these tests as controlling, and the Tot rule has been adhered to in the two subsequent cases in which the issue has been presented. The Tot

Municipal Committee Vs. Arjan Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ721

(B. juncea).It shall not contain:(a) more than 5 per cent, of foreign organic matter, and deteriorated or other seeds and shall be free from insect pests. It shall be free from argemone seeds;(b) more than 5 per … Manmohan Singh Gujral, J.1. On 11th March 1968 Ram Parkash. Food Inspector, Municipal Committee, Amritsar. went to the shop of … leave in which a notice was issued to the accused.2. Rule 44 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, which, prohibits sale of certain admixtures provides that no person shall sell a mixture of two or