Advanced Search Results

National Seed Association of India and Others Vs. the State of Maharas ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : MRTP

that certain provisions of the Seeds Act are applicable only on the seeds notified under the said Act.1968 :Seeds Rules are notified under the provisions of the Seeds Act.December, 1983 :In exercise of the powers conferred under Section … the present case, if the petition succeeds appropriate orders in this regard will be passed; however since the rule is made returnable on 20.08.2008, we are not inclined to stay the effect and operation of the impugned … Fixation of Sale Price) Act, 2009 (published in the official Gazette on 03.07.2009 (“the Mah. Cotton Seed Act”). 4] In W.P. 2493 of 2010 :

Ludhiana Central Co-operative Bank Limited Ludhiana Through Manager an ...

Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is not applicable to the present case as the Seeds Act, 1966 and the Seeds Rules, 1968 are applicable and in this connection, it has been submitted that Apex Court in National Seeds Corpn. Ltd. … Protection Act, 1986 is not applicable to the present case as the Seeds Act, 1966 and the Seeds Rules, 1968 are applicable and in this connection, it has been submitted that Apex Court in National Seeds Corpn.

Gene Campaign . Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

have the right to save seed for sowing in the next season, which a patent-based regime of GM seeds will effectively deny. This choice is a fundamental right and must be retained as such for better farming … from the CIB&RC would attract appropriate legal action under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the Rules, 1971, made under the said Act Writ Petition (Civil) … Points for Consideration: ............................................................................................ 134 Legal Framework:......................................................................................................... 136 Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (EP Act, 1986): ............................................ 146 1989 Rules: .................................................................................................................... 147 Regulatory Framework: .............................................................................................. 156 Constitutional Court and the Environmental Rule of Law: ............................... 168 Public Trust … India through Scientist ‘G’ in the MoEF&CC, New Delhi. 16.1 That on 03.11.2022, it was brought to the notice of this Court that permission of

JaIn Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111

Reported in : 1987(29)ELT753(Del); ILR1985Delhi164

in Item 8 Appendix 10 (1978-79). Similarly for 1978-79 entry No. 8 Clause 3 is of soyabean oil seeds and edible variety is under Ogl (Appendix 10) while for industrial purposes soyabean oil is also included at … Metal Corporation. Madras 1972 Sc 935. In that case appellant applied in 1968 for license for stainless steel in December, 1968. But by the time … helpful if Anand, J. was also with us, as he has passed a detailed referring Order. Indeed,the statutory Rules and Order of the Punjab High Court,Vol, V. as applicable to Delhi High Court, make the following provision … of the Act is absolute. There is no scope for importing the rule of means read at all. Either goods are prohibited or not. If

M/S. Suttind Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S. Sutton and Sons India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Order 39 Rule 1, ; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act - Section 28(1)

its directors etc. from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising directly and indirectly dealing in vegetable and flower seeds bearing the trade mark "SUTTON SEEDS" within parallelogram as and/or any other trade mark, as may be identical … be reported in the Digest? Yes 1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as CPC) read … It started its business in Calcutta about 100 years back. Since in 1968-69 there was a change of law with regard to foreign exchange regulations, … 1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Gwalior Oil Mills

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1986]62STC299(MP)

is neither practicable, nor necessary for the assessee to keep two categories of raw material, i.e., the oil seeds separately and to maintain separate and distinct accounts with regard to the oil produced out of these two … discharge of this obligation and particularly in view of Rule 52 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 (for short, hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules'), read with Section 26 of the Act, the assessee

The State Government of Madhya Pradesh vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Seeds Act.” 13. It is also stated on behalf of respondent no.1 that Rule 3(c) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereafter „the Seeds Rules‟) indicates that one of the statutory functions of the Central Sub-Committee is to “send … Associations of India &Ors. v. The Director General of Civil Aviation &Ors. : Civil Appeal No.3844/2011, decided on 03.05.2011 in support of the aforesaid contention.42. The aforesaid contention is also not persuasive for the reason that the

Vishwas and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra Represented by the See ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

referred as the 'Act' for the sake of brevity] and Rule 2 (g), 7 and 10 of the seeds Rules, 1968 [hereinafter referred as the 'Rules' for the sake of brevity]. 3. Facts giving rise to the present Writ … (b) of the Act read with Rule 7, 10 of the Rules. With these assertions of facts, on 03/09/2011 Seed Inspector filed Complaint before the learned Magistrate at Jafrabad, which was registered as S.T.C. No. 192/2011 and

Brooke Bond India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2 and 8(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 17 and 37

Reported in : 1984(3)ECC107; 1984(15)ELT32(AP)

the business of selling among other items 'Coffee-Chicory Mixture'. The activities of the petitioners consist of purchasing coffee seeds, roasting and grinding them and preparing coffee powder out of those seeds by mechanical process involving consumption of … is necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and the Rules made thereunder. The expressions 'Curing', 'Excisable goods', 'Factory' and 'Manufacture' are defined in Section 2 of the Act … relevant provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and the Rules made thereunder. The expressions 'Curing', 'Excisable goods', 'Factory' and 'Manufacture' are defined

S.K. Oil and Pulses Mill Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1983(2)BomCR668

the Marathwada Development Corporation Limited, situated at Vikas Bhavan, Aurangabad. Respondent No. 3 is the Maharashtra State Oil Seeds Commercial and Industrial Corporation Ltd., situated at Jolly Bhavan No. 2, 2nd Floor, New Marines lines, Bombay.2. The … (The Union of India and others v. M/s. Indo-Afghan Agencies etc. A.I.R. 1968 S.C. 718. As far as India is concerned, this judgment of the … contention documents at different times during this period. Respondent No. 2 also has filed a copy of the rules with a heading 'Chapter II Eligibility Certificate Under Part-1' at Exhibit A-1. These rules are filed along with … this period. Respondent No. 2 also has filed a copy of the rules with a heading 'Chapter II Eligibility Certificate Under Part-1' at Exhibit A-1.