Advanced Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

unit at Dhanora has committed gross violation of the provisions of the mandate of the Seeds Act, 1966, Seeds Rules, 1968, Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 and the provisions 2 of the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale … The provisions of Maharashtra Cotton Seeds Act, 2009 are in pari materia with the Seeds Act, 1966.10. The Preamble of the Seeds Act, 1966, provides “An Act to provide for regulating the quality of certain seeds for … filed by the respondent- Company thereby ordering the appellant-authorities to de-seal all 1 the godowns of the Company at Dhanora which was sealed by the

The State of Madras, Represented by the Collector of Tirunelveli and o ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1969)2MLJ324

with reference to Clause (f) of Sub-section (2) to sell any grade or variety of foodgrains, edible oil seeds or edible oils to the Central Government or a State Government or to an officer or agent of … The Advocate-General would explain away the absence of any reference in the preamble to the order that the State Government was satisfied as to the … found in the throes of famine. Since the Second World War there have been a succession of Acts, Rules and Orders for the control of the production, supply and distribution of and trade and commerce in essential … of the Madras Paddy and Rice (Declaration and Requisitioning of Stocks) Order, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as the Order) invalid, and granting consequential reliefs. The

Sarran Industries (Cotton Seed Oil Industry) Vs. Govt. of A.P. and Oth ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Small Scale Industries (Restriction on Sales Tax Holiday) Act, 1995 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 166(2) and 300-A; Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976 - Sections 23

Reported in : 1999(6)ALD486

G.O.498. Item No.1 of Annexure to G.O.146 is as follows:'Decorticating, Expelling, Crushing, Roasting, Parching, Frying of Edible Oil Seeds of (1) Ground nut, (2) Sesamum, (3) Safflower, (4) Rape Seed/mustard (5) Coconut, (6) Sun flower, (7) Niger … Small Scale Industries (Restriction of Sales Tax Holiday) Act, (Act 14 of 1995). It was recited in the preamble to the Act that the implementation of the High Court's judgment would run against the policy of the

indra Sawhney Etc. Etc Vs. Union of India and Others, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 5, 10, 12, 14-18, 25, 29, 32, 38, 73, 77(3), 87(2), 118, 141, 145(1), 146(1), 148(5), 162, 166(3), 176(2), 187(3), 208, 225, 226, 227(2),; Civil Rights Act, 1964; Communications Act, 1934; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Order (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1993SC477; [1992]Supp2SCR454; 1992DGLS(soft)768:1992Supp(3)SCC217

is not bad and does not offend Article 15(4).35. During the years 1968 to 1971, this Court had to consider the validity of identification of … pointed out the goal-and the methodology for reaching that goal. In the preamble, they spelt out the goal and in parts III and IV, they … dominant test in that behalf.'40. Thomas marks the beginning of a new thinking on Article 16, though the seed of this thought is to be found in the dissenting opinion of Subba Rao,J. in Devadasan. The Kerala … of Backward Classes set out in Schedule III to Part I of the Madras Provincial & Subordinate Service Rules. It was, therefore, argued that Backward Hindus would mean Hindus of any of the communities mentioned in that … the articles under the sub-heading 'Right to equality'-(Articles 14 to 18). In short, the goal is 'equality

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and ors. Vs. Pillibhit Pantnagar Beej Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 141; ;Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 2, 2(11), 3, 4, 4(2), 4A, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11(1), 12, 17, 25 and 40; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 3AAAA(4); ;Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 5, 6, 9(1), 14, 15, 17, 17A, 17II, 21(3) and 23; ;Seed Control Order, 1983; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Foodgrains Movement Restriction (Exemption of Seeds) Order, 1970; Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC605(SC); JT2003(9)SC548; 2003(10)SCALE43; (2004)1SCC391; (2004)1UPLBEC855

our attention to the relevant provisions of the Seeds Act, 1966 (Act No. 54 of 1966) and the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'). We have also perused the Schedule (Sections 2(a) and 4-A) to the … well as sale is governed by 1966 Act and Rules framed thereunder and Seed Control Order 1983. The preamble of the 1966 Act suggests that the same was enacted with a view to monitor the production and … was filed by the first respondent herein to quash the order dated 12.03.1999 (Annexure 17 to the writ petition) and for mandamus restraining the appellants

The State of Kerala and ors. Vs. Annam and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kerala High Court Act, 1959-66 - Sections 5 and 5(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2) and 2(9); Kerala Rice and Paddy (Procurement by Levy) Order, 1966 - Sections 7; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 3(3B) and 3(6); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 31(2); Kerala Paddy and Rice (Declaration and Requisitioning of Stocks) Order, 1966; Kerala Paddy (Maximum Prices) Order, 1965; Kerala Rice (Maximum Prices) Order, 1965

Reported in : AIR1969Ker38

be correct, If I engage a servant or employ a labourer to plough my land or to BOW seeds thereon, the common man would mention me to have cultivated the land, and not the servant or the … Madhavan Nair, J.1. Writ Appeal No. 30 of 1968 is by the State against the judgment' dated February 8, 1968, of … itself indicate the grounds on which exemption could be Granted, but the preamble to the Ordinance sets out with sufficient clearness the policy of the … by the Supreme Court in Jesan Nath v. Jaswant Singh AIR 1954 SC 210:'It is one of the rules of construction that a provision like this is not mandatory unless non-compliance with It is made penal.'In Jan

S.K. Oil and Pulses Mill Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1983(2)BomCR668

the Marathwada Development Corporation Limited, situated at Vikas Bhavan, Aurangabad. Respondent No. 3 is the Maharashtra State Oil Seeds Commercial and Industrial Corporation Ltd., situated at Jolly Bhavan No. 2, 2nd Floor, New Marines lines, Bombay.2. The … (The Union of India and others v. M/s. Indo-Afghan Agencies etc. A.I.R. 1968 S.C. 718. As far as India is concerned, this judgment of the … by its resolution dated 5th January, 1980, has introduced this scheme. The Preamble of the scheme is as follows :--- 'In order to achieve dispersal … contention documents at different times during this period. Respondent No. 2 also has filed a copy of the rules with a heading 'Chapter II Eligibility Certificate Under Part-1' at Exhibit A-1. These rules are filed along with

Seed Association of M.P. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : 2009(4)MPHT453

a communication dated May 26, 2008, has informed that 'there is no provision in Seeds Act, 1966 and Seeds Rules, 1968, to obtain prior sale permission of the State Government for selling the seeds'. Copies of the aforesaid communications, … to 5, cannot be accepted by this Court.22. At this stage, it would be relevant to notice the preamble of The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, as follows:An Act to provide for the protection and improvement of environment … ORDERViney Mittal, J. 1. This issue projected for determination before this Court is:2. Whether for the

indra Sawhney and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 16(4), 32 and 340

Reported in : JT1992(6)SC273; 1993LabIC129; 1992Supp(3)SCC212; [1992]6SCR321

runner who has been all along unfettered.156. Mr. Ram Awadesh Singh, an intervener demonstrably explained that as unwatered seeds do not germinate, unprotected backward class citizens will wither away.157. The above illustration and analogies would lead to … 'Equality of status and of opportunity...' the rubric chiselled in the luminous preamble of our vibrating and pulsating Constitution radiates one of the avowed objectives … both runners back at the starting point? Or is 'something more' needed, and if so, what? Should the rules of the running be altered, and if so, how? Should the previously shackled runner be given a compensatory … Rights' in U.S.A., the 'Rights of Man' in the French Constitution of 1971 and 'Declaration of Human Rights' etc. Our Constitution is unquestionably unique in

Ms. National Seeds Corpn. Ltd. Vs. M. Madhusudhan Reddy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Seeds Act, 1966 - Section 2, 3, 4(1), 6, 7, 8-A to 8-E, 9(3), 10, 11, 123, 13, 14, 15(2)(b), 16, 19, 20, 21, 25; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 13(1); Consumer Act - Section 2(d), 11, 12, 13(1)(c),; Andhra Pradesh Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 ; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 8; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 13, 23(a) to (d), (g), 23-A,; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 74, 75; Contract Act, 1872 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Section 9; Ordinance or Amendment Act, 1993 - Section 2(d)(i)

of the power vested in it under Section 25 of the Seeds Act, the Central Government framed the Seeds Rules, 1968 (for short, `the Rules'). Rules 13, 23(a) to (d), (g) and 23-A of the Rules, which are also … seek Redressal against unfair trade practices or unscrupulous exploitation of consumers, and (f) right to consumer education. 20.The preamble to the Act shows that this legislation is meant to provide for better protection of the interests of … G. S. Singhvi, J. 1. Leave granted in SLP (C) Nos.32750 of 2009 and 35350 of 2009.