Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: seeds act 1966 section 25 · Page 1 of about 336 results (0.045 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 28 2003

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti and ors. Vs. Pillibhit Pantnagar Beej Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-28-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 141; ;Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 2, 2(11), 3, 4, 4(2), 4A, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11(1), 12, 17, 25 and 40; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 3AAAA(4); ;Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 5, 6, 9(1), 14, 15, 17, 17A, 17II, 21(3) and 23; ;Seed Control Order, 1983; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Foodgrains Movement Restriction (Exemption of Seeds) Order, 1970; Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 4(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC605(SC); JT2003(9)SC548; 2003(10)SCALE43; (2004)1SCC391; (2004)1UPLBEC855

ar sown and are germinated under strict supervision of the statutory Seeds Certification Agency, set up under the Seeds Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The harvest is selected carefully under supervision of the Agency. The lots … Agency by or under this Act. Section 9 provides the procedure for grant of certificate by Certification Agency. Section 25 deals with power of the Central Government to make Rules.23. Rule 2(e) of the Rules defines 'certified seed'.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1993

Northern India Seeds Corporation and Seeds India Vs. the State of Biha ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Feb-17-1993

Subject : Constitution

the said University. It was further contended that Rajendra Agriculture University is not a notified Laboratory under the Seeds Act, 1966.19. It has further been contended that upon receipt of the show cause notices, the petitioners contacted the authorities … in course of an investigation in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 70/88 made a statement under Section 164, Cr.P.C. to the effect that in the Laboratory of the said College only abalytical test of water … was marked as C.W.J.C. No. 3395 of 1987. By an order dated 25-8-1987 a Division Bench of this Court allowed the said writ application. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2010

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-21-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 3, 20, 22, 22(6), 24, 24(1), 24(3), 24(4), 24(5), 27, 27A, 29, 31 and 33; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(6) to (8), 12, 13, 13(2), 14, 14A, 17, 17(2), 20 and 20A; ;Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 16, 16(1), 19 and 21; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 16 (1AA), 42 and 319; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 23(4), 25, 25(1), 27, 28, 28A, 28B, 29, 30 and 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 166; ;Insecticides Rules, 1971 - Rules 12B and 25; ;The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rules 3 and 45 ; ;Food Adulteration Rules

of huge increase in the offences taking place in relation to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1954, The Seeds Act 1966, The Insecticides Act 1968 and The Drugs and Cosmetics Act 966 and in the instant cases in relation … in Section 30 minimum sentence is provided which is not provided under Insecticides Act or the Seeds Act.(O) Section 25 of the Act reads thus:Reports of Government Analysts. (1) The Government Analyst to whom a sample of any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 18 2006

Hyderabad Beverages Private Limited Etc. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6(2), 7, 7(1), 7(11), 8, 9A, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2A), 13(2B), 13(D), 13(2E), 13(2), 13(3), 13(5), 13(11), 15, 16, 16(1), 21(3) and 114; Seeds Act, 1966 - Sections 7, 19, 16(2), 14(1) and 15(2); Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 21(1), 22, 22(5), 22(6), 24, 24(3), 24(4) and 30(1); Evidence Act - Sections 114; Insecticides (Amendment) Act, 2000; Central Insecticides Laboratory - Sections 24, 24(3) and 24(4); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 4, 15(3), 15(4), 25, 25(3) and 25(4); Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 26, 33B and 33O; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 2 and 18A; Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1921; Tenants Act - Sections 3 and 9; Indian Penal Co

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3988

complaint in C.C. No. 37 of 2004 was filed under Section 7(b) read with Section 19 of the Seeds Act, 1966. Allegations In the complaint are that, on 24.7.2003, the Seeds Inspector and Assistant Director of Agriculture (Regular) Guntur … litre sealed bottles of Kavery Pure 'N' Safe Water bottles. He served a notice in Form-VI and on 25.3.1999 the sample bottle, along with Form VIII, was sent to the public analyst for analysis. The remaining two

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1991

Omprakash Gulabchandji Partani Vs. Ashok and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-01-1991

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR611; 1992CriLJ2704

and two others under Cl. 23(g) of the Seeds Rules, 1968, for contravention of S. 7 of the Seeds Act, 1966. The complaint case is filed in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amravati, on 2-1-1987. The learned C.J.M., … Seeds Testing Laboratory, Nagpur, had despatched the report of its analysis on 25-7-1986 and according to the analyst report, the sample was not upto the … applicant/accused and two others, on 2-1-1987. 4. The applicant/accused filed an application before the learned C.J.M., Amravati under section 468 of the Criminal Procedure Code and prayed that the institution of the complaint being after the period

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2019

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-22-2019

Subject : MRTP

for the processing unit at Dhanora has committed gross violation of the provisions of the mandate of the Seeds Act, 1966, Seeds Rules, 1968, Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 and the provisions 2 of the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of … applying for any extension in the provided time period. It was urged that in exercise of powers under Section 14(1)(e) of the Seeds Act, 1966, competent authority has full authority to seal the godown for violation of … penalty can be imposed or the offences can be registered for that 25 purpose as provided under the provisions of the Seeds Act but there

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2012

Ms. National Seeds Corpn. Ltd. Vs. M. Madhusudhan Reddy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-16-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Seeds Act, 1966 - Section 2, 3, 4(1), 6, 7, 8-A to 8-E, 9(3), 10, 11, 123, 13, 14, 15(2)(b), 16, 19, 20, 21, 25; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 13(1); Consumer Act - Section 2(d), 11, 12, 13(1)(c),; Andhra Pradesh Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 ; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 8; Seeds Rules, 1968 - Rules 13, 23(a) to (d), (g), 23-A,; Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 74, 75; Contract Act, 1872 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Section 9; Ordinance or Amendment Act, 1993 - Section 2(d)(i)

respondents because the issues relating to the quality of seeds are governed by the provisions contained in the Seeds Act, 1966 (for short, `the Seeds Act') and any complaint about the sale or supply of defective seeds can be … to a firm, means a partner in the firm. 15.In exercise of the power vested in it under Section 25 of the Seeds Act, the Central Government framed the Seeds Rules, 1968 (for short, `the Rules'). Rules 13,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2004

The State of West Bengal Vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-15-2004

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxes

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 51, 136, 141, 245, 246, 246(1), 246(2), 246(3), 248, 248(2), 249 to 252, 253, 256, 257, 265, 276, 301, 356 and 366; Cess Act, 1980 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 5(1) 6 and 18; West Bengal Primary Education Act, 1973 - Sections 78, 78A, 78(1), 78(2) and 78(2A); West Bengal Rural Employment and Production Act, 1976 - Sections 2 and 4; Cess Act, 1880 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6(1) and 72; West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 23B(1); West Bengal Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1992 - Sections 2; Bengal General Clauses Act, 1899 - Sections 3, 4(2) and 4(2A); West Bengal Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1981; West Bengal Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989; Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 4, 4A , 9, 9(2), 9A, 13(2

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(SC)219; [2004]266ITR721(SC); JT2004(1)SC375; 2004(1)SCALE425; (2004)10SCC201; [2004] 1 SCR 564

wheat but the said production which is bought by therespondents is also governed by the provisions of the Seeds Act and theRules framed thereunder. The definition of 'seed' as noticed hereinbeforeis of wide amplitude. It includes seedling of … backdrop the right of the State in terms of Entry 49List II must be held to have been denuded.Section 25 of the Act provides for imposition of cess on production oftea. Production has a direct nexus with the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2024

Gene Campaign . Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2024

Subject : Education

extant rules/regulations, after which the commercial cultivation of mustard will start. Commercial use will be subject to the Seeds Act, 1966 and the related rules and regulations. (iv) As a precautionary mechanism, the data in regard to the impact … of 2004 Etc. Page 11 of 260 Rules”, for the sake of convenience), which have been framed under Sections 6, 8 and 25 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (“EP Act, 1986”, for short) in consonance with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 1984

Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-12-1984

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : (1987)(12)LC161Tri(Delhi)

submit any returns required to be submitted by the crushers of oil seeds and producers of oil therefrom as required under the provisions of Produce … order, held that the Upper Ganges Sugar Mills had contravened Sections 7 and 8 of the Produce Cess Act, 1966 and imposed penalty of Rs. 250/- on the assessee. The Assistant Collector also demanded the oil cess due … dispose of this point, we have to consider the relevant provisions of Produce Cess Act, 1966 (15 of 1966). Section 3(2) provides for the levy and collection as a cess, on every produce, specified in Column 2 of … 8 of the Produce Cess Act, 1966 and imposed penalty of Rs. 250/- on the assessee. The Assistant Collector also demanded the oil cess due

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial