Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: security interest enforcement rules 2002 appendix 1 · Page 1 of about 2,184 results (0.098 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 08 2005

Kalyani Sales Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-08-2005

Subject : Banking

Acts : Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 2, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 13(8), 13(10), 14, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(6), 17(7), 18A, 18(1), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 19(8), 19(25), 31, 34, 35, 37, 38(2), 40 and 40(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - 1(4), 2, 3, 3(1), 13(2), 13(4), 17, 19, 19(1) and 31; Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 - Sections 10, 12, 17 and 18; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2000; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 31; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR2006P& H107; I(2006)BC1; (2006)142PLR1; [2006]70SCL177(Punj& Har)

The possession is taken as per notice appended as Appendix IV in terms of Rule 8(1) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. The notice, in fact, cautions the borrower in particular and the public in general not to deal with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2014

Present: Mr. Manish JaIn Advocate Vs. the Authorized Officer, Uco Bank ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-11-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

a possession notice under Section 13(4) and 13(12) of the SARFAESI Act read with Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (in short 'the Securitisation Rules') dated 06.12.2011 on 08.12.2011 (Annexure P-9) mentioning six properties pertaining to the hospital … presence of two witnesses after a Panchnama drawn and signed by the witnesses as nearly as possible in Appendix I to these rules. (2) After taking possession under sub-rule (1) above, the authorised officer shall make or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2006

Punjab and Sind Bank and anr. Vs. Arun Kumar Arora and anr.

Court : DRAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-22-2006

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : II(2006)BC232

The possession is taken as per notice appended as Appendix IV in terms of Rule 8(1) of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. The notice, in fact, cautions the borrower in particular and the public in general not to deal with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 06 2023

The Sub Registrar, Sub Registry Office, vs Anzar Babu,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-06-2023

and other rates payable to the Central Government or State Government or local authority.15. Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (Rules 2002) deals with sale of immovable secured assets. Sub-section(1) thereto states that where the secured asset is … -35-37. In order to understand the true implication of a sale notice issued under Rule 8 of the Rules 2002, Appendix IV-A constituted as per Rule 8(6) is extracted hereunder:-“APPENDIX IV-A [See proviso to rule 8(6)] SALE NOTICE FOR

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2023

Tahsildar (Rr) Hosdurg Taluk, vs Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-06-2023

and other rates payable to the Central Government or State Government or local authority.15. Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (Rules 2002) deals with sale of immovable secured assets. Sub-section(1) thereto states that where the secured asset is … -35-37. In order to understand the true implication of a sale notice issued under Rule 8 of the Rules 2002, Appendix IV-A constituted as per Rule 8(6) is extracted hereunder:-“APPENDIX IV-A [See proviso to rule 8(6)] SALE NOTICE FOR

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2023

State of Kerala vs Bank of Baroda

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-06-2023

and other rates payable to the Central Government or State Government or local authority.15. Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (Rules 2002) deals with sale of immovable secured assets. Sub-section(1) thereto states that where the secured asset is … -35-37. In order to understand the true implication of a sale notice issued under Rule 8 of the Rules 2002, Appendix IV-A constituted as per Rule 8(6) is extracted hereunder:-“APPENDIX IV-A [See proviso to rule 8(6)] SALE NOTICE FOR

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2023

The Tahsildar vs M/S Arams Tourism Private Limited

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-06-2023

and other rates payable to the Central Government or State Government or local authority.15. Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (Rules 2002) deals with sale of immovable secured assets. Sub-section(1) thereto states that where the secured asset is … -35-37. In order to understand the true implication of a sale notice issued under Rule 8 of the Rules 2002, Appendix IV-A constituted as per Rule 8(6) is extracted hereunder:-“APPENDIX IV-A [See proviso to rule 8(6)] SALE NOTICE FOR

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2023

The Tahsildar vs Renee Joshua

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-06-2023

and other rates payable to the Central Government or State Government or local authority.15. Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (Rules 2002) deals with sale of immovable secured assets. Sub-section(1) thereto states that where the secured asset is … -35-37. In order to understand the true implication of a sale notice issued under Rule 8 of the Rules 2002, Appendix IV-A constituted as per Rule 8(6) is extracted hereunder:-“APPENDIX IV-A [See proviso to rule 8(6)] SALE NOTICE FOR

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2023

The Tahasildar vs Saiju Sathyapalan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-06-2023

and other rates payable to the Central Government or State Government or local authority.15. Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (Rules 2002) deals with sale of immovable secured assets. Sub-section(1) thereto states that where the secured asset is … -35-37. In order to understand the true implication of a sale notice issued under Rule 8 of the Rules 2002, Appendix IV-A constituted as per Rule 8(6) is extracted hereunder:-“APPENDIX IV-A [See proviso to rule 8(6)] SALE NOTICE FOR

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2023

District Collector, vs Bank of Baroda

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-06-2023

and other rates payable to the Central Government or State Government or local authority.15. Rule 8 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (Rules 2002) deals with sale of immovable secured assets. Sub-section(1) thereto states that where the secured asset is … -35-37. In order to understand the true implication of a sale notice issued under Rule 8 of the Rules 2002, Appendix IV-A constituted as per Rule 8(6) is extracted hereunder:-“APPENDIX IV-A [See proviso to rule 8(6)] SALE NOTICE FOR

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial