Advanced Search Results

Pushpa Talwar Vs. A.N. Kapoor

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1) and 39

Reported in : 21(1982)DLT235; 1982RLR223

cannot be used without a license for keeping of a lodging house. Further under Section 2 of The Sarais Act, 1867 'Sarai' means any building used for the shelter and accommodation of travellers. Section 4 of the said Act

State Vs. Jasbir Singh @ Billa and

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 17(1980)DLT404; ILR1979Delhi571

the District Magistrate on September 8, 1977. This register is maintained by him under section 4 of the Sarais Act Xxii of 1867. There is an emtru at Seriall No. 2802, dated August 16, 1978 showing the arrival

A.N. Shervani and anr. Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 2, 2(1), 28, 28(3), 30 and 146; Sarais Act, 1867; Police Regulations, 1980

Reported in : 38(1989)DLT357; 1989RLR296

peace and order. (3) The first regulatory enactment so far as applicable to Delhi in this area is Sarais Act, 1867. Sarai as defined by the Act means any building used for the shelter and accommodation of travellers, and … Simultaneously, of course, there are Sarais and Dharamshalas catering mostly to the needs of rural and economically humble sections of the society. With the increase in population more and more villages are being added to Delhi's urbanised … 1981-82 at the time of A said Games. In the year 1981, 400 applications were made for licenses while in 1982, 167 similar applications were

Kuldip Chand and anr. Vs. Advocate General to Government of Himachal P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyTrusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 92 - Order 20, Rule 12; Sarai Act, 1867; Evidence Act - Sections 35

Reported in : AIR2003SC1685; JT2003(2)SC137; 2003(2)SCALE276; (2003)5SCC46; [2003]1SCR1195

If the Dharamsala was constructed for the purpose of Sarai within the meaning of provisions of the Sarai Act, 1867 still it may not amount to creation of a public trust. Dharamsala was not even registered under the … to the owners. It may be that an engrafted stone was fixed over the main gate of the Sarai mentioning that the some was constructed by Raj Kumar bir Singh, but the same is of little or … Advocate General of the Government of Himachal Pradesh purported to be under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure alleging therein that the same … High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in Regular First Appeal No. 44 of 1984 whereby and whereunder the judgment of a learned Single Judge

Raees-uz-zama and anr. Vs. State Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

general or special orders of the Administrator. (3) The powers and functions of a District Magistrate under the Sarais Act, 1867 (22 of 1867 ), shall be exercised and discharged by the Administrator or such officer as the Administrator … Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or Chief Judicial Magistrate along with the original statement of confession, within forty-eight hours (vide sub-section (4). (d) The CMM/CJM shall record the statement, if any, made by the person so produced and get his

Holiday Inn Inc. Vs. Kapoor Holiday Inn

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1)

Reported in : ILR1986Delhi563

business since November 4, 1977 under a license granted to them by the District Magistrate, Delhi under the Sarai Act of 1867 which had been renewed from time to time by the concerned authorities. The defendant is … their trade. This defense prima facie has no legs to stand. The definition of 'goods' is contained in Section 2(i)(g) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act; it means anything, which is the subject of trade or

Sahu Madho Das and ors. Vs. Mukand Ram and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 32(3); Transfer of Property Act; Registration Act; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1955SC481; 1955 2 MLJ 1

its effect on the case?5. Whether the arrangement mentioned in issue No. 4 was by way of family settlement and what is its effect on … her daughters took separate possession of the properties in the following villages and towns:Har Devi. Qutabpur Amawti.Shakerpore.Lalpur.Bagh Alam Sarai.Houses, shops, etc. inBazar Kot, Sambhal.Durga Devi. Keshopur Bhindi.Tatarpore Ghosi.Half Bilalpat.Qumharwala Bagh.Shehzadi Serai.Houses, shops, etc. inSherkhan Serai, Sambhal.Maha Devi. … the correctness of her claim and accepted the properties as gifts from her or they agreed to and acted on a family settlement to avoid disputes on the basis that each got an absolute title to whatever … litigation. It is a moot point whether they would be admissible under Section 32(3) of the Evidence Act, but we need not decide that because

Shib Chandra Vs. Lachmi Narain

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1930)32BOMLR6

Bari, also purchased certain other items of property, i. e., a grove consisting of some land in Majahidpur Sarai and certain houses and shops, and the sum of Rs. 4,000 was entered against them as the principal. … determination now is whether the deposit made by the plaintiffs under Section 83 of the Transfer of Property Act on June 29, 1912, was sufficient.3. On March 23, 1905, the original mortgagors executed a mortgage deed in