Advanced Search Results
A.N. Shervani and anr. Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.
Delhi
May-19-1989
Commercial
Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 2, 2(1), 28, 28(3), 30 and 146; Sarais Act, 1867; Police Regulations, 1980
38(1989)DLT357; 1989RLR296
peace and order. (3) The first regulatory enactment so far as applicable to Delhi in this area is Sarais Act, 1867. Sarai as defined by the Act means any building used for the shelter and accommodation of travellers, and … Simultaneously, of course, there are Sarais and Dharamshalas catering mostly to the needs of rural and economically humble sections of the society. With the increase in population more and more villages are being added to Delhi's urbanised
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKuldip Chand and anr. Vs. Advocate General to Government of Himachal P ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-14-2003
PropertyTrusts and Societies
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 92 - Order 20, Rule 12; Sarai Act, 1867; Evidence Act - Sections 35
AIR2003SC1685; JT2003(2)SC137; 2003(2)SCALE276; (2003)5SCC46; [2003]1SCR1195
If the Dharamsala was constructed for the purpose of Sarai within the meaning of provisions of the Sarai Act, 1867 still it may not amount to creation of a public trust. Dharamsala was not even registered under the … to the owners. It may be that an engrafted stone was fixed over the main gate of the Sarai mentioning that the some was constructed by Raj Kumar bir Singh, but the same is of little or … Advocate General of the Government of Himachal Pradesh purported to be under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure alleging therein that the same … the said Dharamsala on a land measuring 1702 sq. yards and 18 3/4 sq. Girha; comprising of Khasra Nos. 991 with Gosha A &B;, pp2,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPushpa Talwar Vs. A.N. Kapoor
Delhi
Feb-09-1982
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1) and 39
21(1982)DLT235; 1982RLR223
cannot be used without a license for keeping of a lodging house. Further under Section 2 of The Sarais Act, 1867 'Sarai' means any building used for the shelter and accommodation of travellers. Section 4 of the said Act … Sultan Singh, J. (1) The appellant-landlady, in this second appeal under Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') challenges the judgment and order
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Raees-uz-zama and anr. Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Delhi
May-03-2013
Land Acquisition
general or special orders of the Administrator. (3) The powers and functions of a District Magistrate under the Sarais Act, 1867 (22 of 1867 ), shall be exercised and discharged by the Administrator or such officer as the Administrator … from threat or inducement and shall be in the same language in which the person makes it (vide sub-section (3). (c) The person from whom a confession has been recorded under sub-section (1) shall be produced before the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHoliday Inn Inc. Vs. Kapoor Holiday Inn
Delhi
May-20-1986
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1)
ILR1986Delhi563
business since November 4, 1977 under a license granted to them by the District Magistrate, Delhi under the Sarai Act of 1867 which had been renewed from time to time by the concerned authorities. The defendant is … their trade. This defense prima facie has no legs to stand. The definition of 'goods' is contained in Section 2(i)(g) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act; it means anything, which is the subject of trade or … M.K. Chawla, J.(1) Holiday Inn Inc., 3742, Lamar Avenue. Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A. is the plaintiff in Suit No. 16261
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Jasbir Singh @ Billa and
Delhi
Nov-16-1979
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313
17(1980)DLT404; ILR1979Delhi571
the District Magistrate on September 8, 1977. This register is maintained by him under section 4 of the Sarais Act Xxii of 1867. There is an emtru at Seriall No. 2802, dated August 16, 1978 showing the arrival … @ Ranga and Jasbir- Singh @ Billa have been convicted by an Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, under section 302/34, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to death for having committed the murder of Gee'a and Sanjay. Both of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRichard Ross Skinner Vs. Durga Prasad and anr.
Allahabad
Oct-17-1904
Family
3Ind.Cas.66
the date of his birth being given as the 27th of December 1867, and his mother's naine being given in the baptismal certificate as Fanny … about 2 or 1 1/2 months after Ahmadi. He says that the three girls lived in the Mahal Sarai, and that Thomas Brown Skinner was not under his mother's control and did what he liked, and so … Skinner. We shall first deal with the will. The testator died before the passing of the Indian Succession Act of 1865, so that that Act does not aid us in the matter. His domicile was in the … was obliged to call in aid of his argument the provisions of Section S4 of the Indian Succession Act of 1865, asking us to hold … that Thomas Brown Skinner, who died on the 3rd July 1900, left no lawful male issue, and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSahu Madho Das and ors. Vs. Mukand Ram and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-22-1955
Family
Evidence Act - Sections 32(3); Transfer of Property Act; Registration Act; Hindu Law
AIR1955SC481; 1955 2 MLJ 1
her daughters took separate possession of the properties in the following villages and towns:Har Devi. Qutabpur Amawti.Shakerpore.Lalpur.Bagh Alam Sarai.Houses, shops, etc. inBazar Kot, Sambhal.Durga Devi. Keshopur Bhindi.Tatarpore Ghosi.Half Bilalpat.Qumharwala Bagh.Shehzadi Serai.Houses, shops, etc. inSherkhan Serai, Sambhal.Maha Devi. … the correctness of her claim and accepted the properties as gifts from her or they agreed to and acted on a family settlement to avoid disputes on the basis that each got an absolute title to whatever … litigation. It is a moot point whether they would be admissible under Section 32(3) of the Evidence Act, but we need not decide that because
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShib Chandra Vs. Lachmi Narain
Mumbai
Jun-21-1929
Property
(1930)32BOMLR6
Bari, also purchased certain other items of property, i. e., a grove consisting of some land in Majahidpur Sarai and certain houses and shops, and the sum of Rs. 4,000 was entered against them as the principal. … determination now is whether the deposit made by the plaintiffs under Section 83 of the Transfer of Property Act on June 29, 1912, was sufficient.3. On March 23, 1905, the original mortgagors executed a mortgage deed in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›