Advanced Search Results

A.N. Shervani and anr. Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 2, 2(1), 28, 28(3), 30 and 146; Sarais Act, 1867; Police Regulations, 1980

Reported in : 38(1989)DLT357; 1989RLR296

peace and order. (3) The first regulatory enactment so far as applicable to Delhi in this area is Sarais Act, 1867. Sarai as defined by the Act means any building used for the shelter and accommodation of travellers, and … and the other submissions following it will require familiarisation with the substantive provisions of the Police Regulations, 1980. Section 2(1) of the Delhi Police Act, 1978 defines places of 'public entertainment' as a lodging house, boarding and lodging

Pushpa Talwar Vs. A.N. Kapoor

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1) and 39

Reported in : 21(1982)DLT235; 1982RLR223

cannot be used without a license for keeping of a lodging house. Further under Section 2 of The Sarais Act, 1867 'Sarai' means any building used for the shelter and accommodation of travellers. Section 4 of the said Act

Kuldip Chand and anr. Vs. Advocate General to Government of Himachal P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyTrusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 92 - Order 20, Rule 12; Sarai Act, 1867; Evidence Act - Sections 35

Reported in : AIR2003SC1685; JT2003(2)SC137; 2003(2)SCALE276; (2003)5SCC46; [2003]1SCR1195

If the Dharamsala was constructed for the purpose of Sarai within the meaning of provisions of the Sarai Act, 1867 still it may not amount to creation of a public trust. Dharamsala was not even registered under the … the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the said Court dated 20.3.1984 passed in Civil Suit No. 22 of 1979 was reversed. 2. Fact … to the owners. It may be that an engrafted stone was fixed over the main gate of the Sarai mentioning that the some was constructed by Raj Kumar bir Singh, but the same is of little or … Advocate General of the Government of Himachal Pradesh purported to be under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure alleging therein that the same

Raees-uz-zama and anr. Vs. State Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

general or special orders of the Administrator. (3) The powers and functions of a District Magistrate under the Sarais Act, 1867 (22 of 1867 ), shall be exercised and discharged by the Administrator or such officer as the Administrator … not bound to make the confession and if he does so, it may be used against him (vide sub-section (2). (b) The confession shall be recorded in an atmosphere free from threat or inducement and shall be in

Holiday Inn Inc. Vs. Kapoor Holiday Inn

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1)

Reported in : ILR1986Delhi563

business since November 4, 1977 under a license granted to them by the District Magistrate, Delhi under the Sarai Act of 1867 which had been renewed from time to time by the concerned authorities. The defendant is … their trade. This defense prima facie has no legs to stand. The definition of 'goods' is contained in Section 2(i)(g) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act; it means anything, which is the subject of trade or

State Vs. Jasbir Singh @ Billa and

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 17(1980)DLT404; ILR1979Delhi571

the District Magistrate on September 8, 1977. This register is maintained by him under section 4 of the Sarais Act Xxii of 1867. There is an emtru at Seriall No. 2802, dated August 16, 1978 showing the arrival … imprisonment for seven years under the third count. Jasbir Singh @ Billa has also been convicted under section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year. All the sentences have been directed

Richard Ross Skinner Vs. Durga Prasad and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Reported in : 3Ind.Cas.66

about 2 or 1 1/2 months after Ahmadi. He says that the three girls lived in the Mahal Sarai, and that Thomas Brown Skinner was not under his mother's control and did what he liked, and so … the date of his birth being given as the 27th of December 1867, and his mother's naine being given in the baptismal certificate as Fanny … Skinner. We shall first deal with the will. The testator died before the passing of the Indian Succession Act of 1865, so that that Act does not aid us in the matter. His domicile was in the … was obliged to call in aid of his argument the provisions of Section S4 of the Indian Succession Act of 1865, asking us to hold

Sahu Madho Das and ors. Vs. Mukand Ram and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 32(3); Transfer of Property Act; Registration Act; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1955SC481; 1955 2 MLJ 1

her daughters took separate possession of the properties in the following villages and towns:Har Devi. Qutabpur Amawti.Shakerpore.Lalpur.Bagh Alam Sarai.Houses, shops, etc. inBazar Kot, Sambhal.Durga Devi. Keshopur Bhindi.Tatarpore Ghosi.Half Bilalpat.Qumharwala Bagh.Shehzadi Serai.Houses, shops, etc. inSherkhan Serai, Sambhal.Maha Devi. … the correctness of her claim and accepted the properties as gifts from her or they agreed to and acted on a family settlement to avoid disputes on the basis that each got an absolute title to whatever … litigation. It is a moot point whether they would be admissible under Section 32(3) of the Evidence Act, but we need not decide that because … who was his maternal grandfather. The family tree-is as below:NANAK CHAND d. 28-7.56W : Mst. PATO d. Jan. 1873______________________________|______________________________| | | Mst. Maba Devi Mst.

Shib Chandra Vs. Lachmi Narain

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1930)32BOMLR6

Bari, also purchased certain other items of property, i. e., a grove consisting of some land in Majahidpur Sarai and certain houses and shops, and the sum of Rs. 4,000 was entered against them as the principal. … determination now is whether the deposit made by the plaintiffs under Section 83 of the Transfer of Property Act on June 29, 1912, was sufficient.3. On March 23, 1905, the original mortgagors executed a mortgage deed in … to redeem two items of properties covered by a mortgage dated March 23, 1905, namely, 13 Biswas of the village Sadat Bari and the whole