Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: sarais act 1867 section 10 · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.027 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 19 1989

A.N. Shervani and anr. Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-19-1989

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 2, 2(1), 28, 28(3), 30 and 146; Sarais Act, 1867; Police Regulations, 1980

Reported in : 38(1989)DLT357; 1989RLR296

peace and order. (3) The first regulatory enactment so far as applicable to Delhi in this area is Sarais Act, 1867. Sarai as defined by the Act means any building used for the shelter and accommodation of travellers, and … Simultaneously, of course, there are Sarais and Dharamshalas catering mostly to the needs of rural and economically humble sections of the society. With the increase in population more and more villages are being added to Delhi's urbanised

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2003

Kuldip Chand and anr. Vs. Advocate General to Government of Himachal P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-14-2003

Subject : PropertyTrusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 92 - Order 20, Rule 12; Sarai Act, 1867; Evidence Act - Sections 35

Reported in : AIR2003SC1685; JT2003(2)SC137; 2003(2)SCALE276; (2003)5SCC46; [2003]1SCR1195

If the Dharamsala was constructed for the purpose of Sarai within the meaning of provisions of the Sarai Act, 1867 still it may not amount to creation of a public trust. Dharamsala was not even registered under the … to the owners. It may be that an engrafted stone was fixed over the main gate of the Sarai mentioning that the some was constructed by Raj Kumar bir Singh, but the same is of little or … Advocate General of the Government of Himachal Pradesh purported to be under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure alleging therein that the same

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1982

Pushpa Talwar Vs. A.N. Kapoor

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-09-1982

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1) and 39

Reported in : 21(1982)DLT235; 1982RLR223

cannot be used without a license for keeping of a lodging house. Further under Section 2 of The Sarais Act, 1867 'Sarai' means any building used for the shelter and accommodation of travellers. Section 4 of the said Act … the appellant in consideration of Rs. 35,000.00 . The appellant was substituted in place of Mr. Virmani. On 10th March, 1967 the eviction application was dismissed as per order (Ex. R. 2) and by another order dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 20 1986

Holiday Inn Inc. Vs. Kapoor Holiday Inn

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-20-1986

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1)

Reported in : ILR1986Delhi563

business since November 4, 1977 under a license granted to them by the District Magistrate, Delhi under the Sarai Act of 1867 which had been renewed from time to time by the concerned authorities. The defendant is … about 1,000 million Dollars. In the last year the plaintiff spent over 10 million Dollars on advertising the 'Holiday Inn' trade mark all over India … their trade. This defense prima facie has no legs to stand. The definition of 'goods' is contained in Section 2(i)(g) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act; it means anything, which is the subject of trade or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 1979

State Vs. Jasbir Singh @ Billa and

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-16-1979

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 17(1980)DLT404; ILR1979Delhi571

the District Magistrate on September 8, 1977. This register is maintained by him under section 4 of the Sarais Act Xxii of 1867. There is an emtru at Seriall No. 2802, dated August 16, 1978 showing the arrival … of the Code of Criminal Procedure for confirmation of the sentences of All the appeals (Criminal Appeals Nos. 108 to 110 of 1979) and Murder Reference No. 1 of 1979 will be disposed of by this judgment.(2)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 1904

Richard Ross Skinner Vs. Durga Prasad and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-17-1904

Subject : Family

Reported in : 3Ind.Cas.66

the date of his birth being given as the 27th of December 1867, and his mother's naine being given in the baptismal certificate as Fanny … about 2 or 1 1/2 months after Ahmadi. He says that the three girls lived in the Mahal Sarai, and that Thomas Brown Skinner was not under his mother's control and did what he liked, and so … Skinner. We shall first deal with the will. The testator died before the passing of the Indian Succession Act of 1865, so that that Act does not aid us in the matter. His domicile was in the … was obliged to call in aid of his argument the provisions of Section S4 of the Indian Succession Act of 1865, asking us to hold … both of which suits were dismissed. Appeal No. 106 is an appeal by Thomas William Skinner in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2013

Raees-uz-zama and anr. Vs. State Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-03-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

general or special orders of the Administrator. (3) The powers and functions of a District Magistrate under the Sarais Act, 1867 (22 of 1867 ), shall be exercised and discharged by the Administrator or such officer as the Administrator … accused are free from threat, coercion and pressure. The Supreme Court rejected the contention, after due deliberation, that Section 10 of the Evidence Act can be invoked in respect of the confessions made under Section 32 of POTA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1955

Sahu Madho Das and ors. Vs. Mukand Ram and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-22-1955

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 32(3); Transfer of Property Act; Registration Act; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1955SC481; 1955 2 MLJ 1

her daughters took separate possession of the properties in the following villages and towns:Har Devi. Qutabpur Amawti.Shakerpore.Lalpur.Bagh Alam Sarai.Houses, shops, etc. inBazar Kot, Sambhal.Durga Devi. Keshopur Bhindi.Tatarpore Ghosi.Half Bilalpat.Qumharwala Bagh.Shehzadi Serai.Houses, shops, etc. inSherkhan Serai, Sambhal.Maha Devi. … the correctness of her claim and accepted the properties as gifts from her or they agreed to and acted on a family settlement to avoid disputes on the basis that each got an absolute title to whatever … litigation. It is a moot point whether they would be admissible under Section 32(3) of the Evidence Act, but we need not decide that because … Maba Devi Mst. Durga Devi Mst. Har Devid. 1912 d. 1888 d. 10.9.1918H : Nathmal Das H : Jwala Prasad H : Bhawani| | ShankerMst.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 1929

Shib Chandra Vs. Lachmi Narain

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-21-1929

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1930)32BOMLR6

Bari, also purchased certain other items of property, i. e., a grove consisting of some land in Majahidpur Sarai and certain houses and shops, and the sum of Rs. 4,000 was entered against them as the principal. … determination now is whether the deposit made by the plaintiffs under Section 83 of the Transfer of Property Act on June 29, 1912, was sufficient.3. On March 23, 1905, the original mortgagors executed a mortgage deed in … mortgage deed and the lease. He accordingly passed a decree for Rs. 10,720-10-4 and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent, per annum

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial