Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: rubber act 1947 section 9 · Page 1 of about 772 results (0.078 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 16 2005

T.T.K.-lig Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-16-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(193)ELT169TriDel

importation, to the extent equal to the duty of excise levied as cess under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 on rubber produced/manufactured in India as on the said date? 2. It appears that the appellants had challenged … of the Federal Court in The Province of Madras v. Boddu Paidanna and Sons reported in 1941 F.C.R. 90, 101 and the decision of the Judicial Committee, in Governor General in Council v. Province of Madras -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1989

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ruby Rubber Works Ltd.,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-06-1989

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961

Reported in : [1989]178ITR181(Ker)

subsidy scheme framed by the Rubber Board and the provisions of the Rubber Act.14. Section 8 of the Rubber Act, 1947, provides that it shall be the duty of the Board to promote by such measures as it thinks … of the power that has been given by the statute under Section 8 of the Rubber Act. Section 9(2) of the Rubber Act provides that the Board shall maintain two funds, a general fund and a pool

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2004

Jay Shree Tea Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Industrial Tribunal-i and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-28-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6W

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC959

and Industries Ltd., a public sector company, and Jay Shree Tyres and Rubber Products as well as Sri R. P. Verma, a share holder in … share holder in Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., to declare Section 6W of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as constitutionally bad and invalid, violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, and for a writ … State Board. The School Tribunal constituted under Section 8 of the Maharashtra Act cannot entertain appeals filed under Section 9 by the employees working in schools which are established and administered by the Cantonment Board. Teacher employed in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 02 2005

Tik-lig Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-02-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(190)ELT47TriDel

date of importation) to an extent equal to the amount of CESS leviable under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 on natural rubber manufactured produced in India (as on the said date)".The other two matters came to be … to the Revenue, precisely, it was that duty which was demanded on assessment of the Bill of Entry. 9. We have perused the decisions cited before us. In Final Order dated 6-5-2002, this Bench was seized of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2016

Flextronics Technologies (India) Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-18-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(SC)], the Supreme Court was concerned with a question whether the cess payable under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947, will form part of the purchase turnover of the company under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act or … sought a clarification from the department, by submitting a letter dated 6.9.2010. 9. Pending receipt of the clarification from the department, the purchaser namely Huawei … (Prayer: Tax Case Revision filed under Section 60 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2005 read with Rule 14 of the Tamil Nadu

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1997

State of Kerala Vs. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1997

Subject : Sales TaxExcise

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 5; Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 12 and 12(1); Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960; Rubber Rules - Rule 33D

Reported in : AIR1998SC723; JT1997(10)SC298; 1998(1)KLT201(SC); 1997(7)SCALE804; (1998)1SCC616; [1997]Supp6SCR698; [1998]108STC583(SC)

arises for consideration in this batch of cases is whether the cess payable under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947 will form part of the purchase turnover of the respondents under the Kerala General Sales Tax, 1963.3. M/s. … the State of Kerala or was sent out of the State for use elsewhere.4. Under the provisions of Section 5 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Sales Tax Act') the … Kirpal, J.1. Special leave granted in SLP (Civil) Nos. 9649-50 of 1997.2. The only question which arises for consideration in this batch

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 1989

Madras Rubber Factory Limited Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-29-1989

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1989]74STC56(Ker)

arises for consideration in these cases is whether the cess payable and paid by the manufacturers, under the Rubber Act, 1947 and the Rules, will form part of their purchase turnover, under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. In … 1976-77 and 1977-78. The sole respondent in these three revisions is the Revenue. In these revisions, filed under Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, the revision petitioner prays to set aside or annul the … on the basis of the decision of this Court in T.R.C. Nos. 96 to 99 of 1983 and connected cases (Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1988

M.Ct.M. Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Madras and ors. Vs. the Director of Enf ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-09-1988

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 54; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 5, 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 12(2), 17, 18-A, 18-B, 23 and 23(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1964

Reported in : AIR1989Mad141

62186-43 receivable by the fifth appellant on account of sale of Nataraja Rubber Estate in 1959 was delayed; (ii) that the fifth appellant in contravention … appellants who were initially charged for having contravened the provisions of Section 10(1)(b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) were later on proceeded against departmentally for- contravention of the provisions of … material, reads as follows:-- '...Penalty and procedure--(1) If any person contravenes the provisions of Section 4, Section 5, Section 9, Section 10, Sub-section (2) of Section 12, Section 17, Section 18-A or Section 18-B or of any rule,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2003

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Kanpur Region Vs. Babu Singh an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-01-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(6)

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2433; [2003(97)FLR1160]

as the award is subject to judicial review in writ jurisdiction. (Vide The Workmen of Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. of India P. Ltd. v. Management and Ors. : (1973)ILLJ278SC ; Rama Kant Misra v. State of … industrial dispute and the appropriate Government in exercise of its power under Section 4K of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Act 1947), made a reference vide order dated 19.5.1992 as to whether the removal of … petitioner Corporation and he was served the charge-sheet for embezzlement of Rs. 9.70 as he had received the fare from the passenger and did not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2008

Foreshore Co-operative Housing Society Limited, a Co-operative Society ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2008

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 14, 27 and 58; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 32; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 9A, 115 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 7, Rules 6 and 11 - Order 14, Rule 2; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Indian Trusts Act, 1882; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 33; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 164

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR600; 2009(1)BomCR757; (2008)110BOMLR3696; 2009(2)MhLj28

Senior Counsel for the Respondents cited another judgment, M. Bagasarwalla v. Hind Rubber Industries 1997 3 SCC 443 to point out that there is no … on the interpretation of 'jurisdiction'. These judgments pertain to matters under tribunals, statutory authorities under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.v) In Smithkline Beechan's case, Mr. Doctor submitted that the question raised was … term 'jurisdiction' as used in Section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 must be construed harmoniously with Section 9, CPC. This was upheld in Smithkline Beechan Consumer Health Care v. Hindustan Lever Ltd and Ors. : (2003)105BOMLR547

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial