Advanced Search Results
Shri Krishna Rubber Works Vs. the Union of India (Uoi)
Mumbai
Nov-30-1970
Civil
(1971)73BOMLR496
Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of a levy under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947, as amended in 1960 and the Rules framed thereunder and recoveries made and demand notice issued in respect … used in distinctive senses. It has been stated in American Jurisprudence, 1956, Reprint, Vol. 51, page 56, para. 28 :28...It has been variously stated that the character or nature of a particular tax must be determined by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRubber Wood India Pvt.Ltd. vs Manojkumar P.S
Kerala
Aug-02-2022
of by the common judgment.3. The first writ petition is on behalf of theRubber Board established under the Rubber Act, 1947 which falls under the aegis of Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. It is aggrieved of … ‘appropriate Government’ provided under Section 2(a)(i) & (ii) and ‘employer’ provided under Section 2(g) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Section 2(a)(i) & (ii)(a) "appropriate Government" means(i) in relation to any industrial disputeconcerning any industry carried on by or … OF GOVERNMENT ORDER NO.L- 09.1.2020. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF SUMMONS DATED 28.02.2020 ISSUED BY THE 14TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. -43- APPENDIX OF WP(C)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Rubber Board, vs Manojkumar P.S.,
Kerala
Aug-02-2022
of by the common judgment.3. The first writ petition is on behalf of theRubber Board established under the Rubber Act, 1947 which falls under the aegis of Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. It is aggrieved of … ‘appropriate Government’ provided under Section 2(a)(i) & (ii) and ‘employer’ provided under Section 2(g) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Section 2(a)(i) & (ii)(a) "appropriate Government" means(i) in relation to any industrial disputeconcerning any industry carried on by or … OF GOVERNMENT ORDER NO.L- 09.1.2020. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF SUMMONS DATED 28.02.2020 ISSUED BY THE 14TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. -43- APPENDIX OF WP(C)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
District Forest Officer, Madurai Division Vs. P. Ganesan (Died) and or ...
Chennai
Sep-29-2006
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 2(1), 30, 30(1) and 30(2); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 28; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; ;Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 - Rules 36 and 43; Constitution of India - Article 226; Limitation Act - Sections 5
2007ACJ1521; [2007(112)FLR561]; (2006)4MLJ1653
animals etc., and it is also running factories of its own, i.e., rubber factories, sandalwood factories, eucalyptus, paper mills, apart from the selling plants, honey … under the Workmen Compensation Act. The forest guard is a workman coming within the definition of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Section 2 (1)(n) of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 defined 'Workman' as 'any person', whose employment is of a … to entertain the claim petition of a Government servant, is also unsustainable, in view of the fact that Section 28 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, exempts the Industrial Tribunal, Labour Court or any other authority constituted under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala, represented by Joint Commissioner (Law) Vs. M/s. M.R. ...
Kerala
Jan-06-2016
Land Acquisition
supported by the Explanatory Note to the Notification. 13. Rubber Board is established under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947. Annexure R1(b) affidavit of the Corporate Manager of the assessee is filed placing therewith the certificate dated 13.06.2011 … Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. These revisions under Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and original petitions stand remitted by the Hon'ble Supreme … the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as per the remand order dated 28.4.2011 in Civil Appeal No.3758 of 2011 and connections. 2. The basic substratum
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShirish Pandharinath Joshi and Others Vs. The General Manager, Bosch C ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Jun-24-2015
Labour and Industrial
challenged the decision of the Industrial Tribunal before this Court. This Court in its decision in The Dunlop Rubber Co. (India) Ltd. v. Workmen and others (1960) 2 SCR 51, rendered on October 16, 1959, upheld the … made partly absolute. Model Standing Orders framed under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(p), Section 2(s), Section 18(1) - Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rule 62(4) €“ Retirement - Enhancement … 06.09.1985. He was retired upon completion of 55 years of age on 28.08.2008. (c) Petitioner No.3 joined duties with the Respondent/Management on 16.03.1986. He attained
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuperintending Engineer and ors. Vs. Workmen of Machkund Hydro Electri ...
Orissa
Nov-12-1959
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1), 15 and 25G; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1960Ori205
the question came to be incidentally considered in a recent Madras case in Management of India Tyre and Rubber Co. (India) Private Ltd. v. Workers of the India Tyre and Rubber Co., (India) Private Ltd., AIR 1958 … in all these cases as aforesaid was not the 'appropriate Government' within the meaning of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947) and accordingly the said reference having been invalid, it was contended that the awards … these petitions which were analogously heard.2. The appropriate Government as defined in Section 2(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947) means … Commissioner, Orissa, threatened that they would go on strike with, effect from 28-7-1956 if no settlement was reached and die dispute was not referred to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPlanters Forum Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
Nov-17-2014
Land Acquisition
in the District of Malabar and South Canera. Another enactment which needs to be noticed is the Plantation Rubber Act, 1951 and the Kerala Plantation Rubber Rules, 1991 which managed registration of all plantations of 5 acres or … taken over thereunder: These acts include:1. The Indian Forests Act, 1927.2. The Coffee Act, 1942.3. The Rubber Act, 1947.4. The Tea Act, 1953.5. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1980.6. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980.7. The Spices Board Act, … 2003 Act was passed by the State Legislature and notified on 06.06.2005. Section 1(2) further provided that the 2003 Act shall be deemed to have … 22661, 29466, 27296, 32740, 32767, 36454, 29199, 14064, 34575, 25801, 12594, 14298, 2871, 8127, 1006, 1767, 8412, 10770, 20694, 25835, 25867, 34554, 27821, 29101 &
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJay Shree Tea Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Industrial Tribunal-i and o ...
Allahabad
Jan-28-2004
Labour and Industrial
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6W
2004(2)AWC959
been filed by Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., a public sector company, and Jay Shree Tyres and Rubber Products as well as Sri R. P. Verma, a share holder in Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., … share holder in Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., to declare Section 6W of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as constitutionally bad and invalid, violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, and for a writ … heard and allowed, along with other connected petitions, by this Court on 28.3.1990. The Court relied upon the Supreme Court decision in Excel Wear and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVIP Industries Shramik Sangh Vs. VIP Industries Limited, A Public Ltd. ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Oct-31-2014
Land Acquisition
Sahu Nagar, reported in 1972 I LLJ, 437, M/s. Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. of India (P) Ltd. Vs. The Workmen Employed represented by Firestone … therein that by transferring 140 employees, the Management had violated provisions of Section 33(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [for short, ‘the Act of 1947]. Thereafter, on 20-07-2011 the Conciliation Officer issued a notice to the parties … aside. 4. During aforesaid period, the Union had filed Complaint No.245 of 2011 before the Industrial Court under Section 28 of the Act of 1971 challenging the transfer of 140 employees. However, aforesaid complaint came to be withdrawn
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »