Advanced Search Results
Cia Vs. Sims
US Supreme Court
Apr-16-1985
Right to Information
Baldrige v. Shapiro, 455 U. S. 345 , 455 U. S. 352 (1982); NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U. S. 214 , 437 U. S. 220 (1978); EPA v. Mink, 410 U. S. 73 … to in Exemption 3, § 102(d)(3) of the National Security Act of 1947, which states that "the Director of Central Intelligence shall be responsible for … intelligence sources would be identified indirectly. Id. at 27a, 34a. Both the Agency and respondents appealed. The … 1977, respondents in No. 83-1075 (hereafter respondents) filed a request with the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), seeking, inter alia, the names of the institutions and individuals who had performed the research under MKULTRA. … to obtain the type of information provided by the researcher. Held: 1. Section 102(d)(3) qualifies as a withholding statute under Exemption 3. Section 102(d)(3) clearly
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMartIn Vs. Wilks
US Supreme Court
Jun-12-1989
Land Acquisition
could not deprive them of any contractual rights, such as seniority, cf. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Rubber Workers, 461 U. S. 757 (1983), or accrued vacation pay, cf. Massachusetts v. Morash, ante p. 107, or … conclusions drafted by the prevailing parties. See App. to Pet. for Cert. 27a, 37a. In his oral statement, the judge adhered to the legal position … CIRCUIT Syllabus Black individuals and a branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People brought actions in Federal District Court against the city of Birmingham, Alabama, and the Jefferson County Personnel Board (Board), alleging … of racial discrimination, either Page 490 U. S. 781 under Title 7, Section 1981, 1983, or the 14th Amendment. That remains my conclusion, given the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›