Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: rubber act 1947 section 27 · Page 1 of about 0 results (0.029 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 29 1989

Madras Rubber Factory Limited Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-29-1989

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1989]74STC56(Ker)

arises for consideration in these cases is whether the cess payable and paid by the manufacturers, under the Rubber Act, 1947 and the Rules, will form part of their purchase turnover, under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. In … 1512, Jullundur Rubber Goods . v. Commercial Tax Officer [1985] 59 STC 277 (SC) and Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International Ltd. AIR 1984 … 1976-77 and 1977-78. The sole respondent in these three revisions is the Revenue. In these revisions, filed under Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, the revision petitioner prays to set aside or annul the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1986

Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes) Vs. B ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-20-1986

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 41; Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 12(4), 12(5), 12(6) and 20; Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960; Rubber Rules - Rule 33D; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act; Andhra Pradesh Distillery Rules; Central Excise Act; Central Excise Rules

Reported in : 1987(11)ECC96; 1988(33)ELT664(Ker)

Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act.2. Rubber cess is' payable under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 (Central Act 24 of 1947). Section 12 as it originally stood is extracted below :'Imposition of rubber cess. … State of Mysore (1967) 1 SCR 548, 3ullundur Rubber Goods . v. Commercial Tax Officer (1985) 59 STC 277 (SC). After considering the decision of the Federal Court in Province of Madras v. Boddu Paidanna & Sons

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2005

Cc Vs. Sudhir Papers Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : May-30-2005

Subject : MRTP

assessee had not been passed on to the consumers. He has noted that Rubber Cess, in terms of Rubber Act 1947, is not in terms of Section 27 of the Customs Act and hence, the provisions of unjust enrichment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 19 1997

State of Kerala Vs. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1997

Subject : Sales TaxExcise

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 5; Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 12 and 12(1); Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960; Rubber Rules - Rule 33D

Reported in : AIR1998SC723; JT1997(10)SC298; 1998(1)KLT201(SC); 1997(7)SCALE804; (1998)1SCC616; [1997]Supp6SCR698; [1998]108STC583(SC)

arises for consideration in this batch of cases is whether the cess payable under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947 will form part of the purchase turnover of the respondents under the Kerala General Sales Tax, 1963.3. M/s. … the State of Kerala or was sent out of the State for use elsewhere.4. Under the provisions of Section 5 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Sales Tax Act') the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2005

Tik-lig Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-02-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(190)ELT47TriDel

date of importation) to an extent equal to the amount of CESS leviable under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 on natural rubber manufactured produced in India (as on the said date)".The other two matters came to be … case of CCE, Chennai v. Pepsico Holdings Ltd. reported in 2001 (42) RLT 800-Final Order No. 1581/2003, dated 27-10-2000 (CEGAT) [2001 (130) E.L.T. 193 (T)] had been a accepted as reported by the Chief Commissioner.4. We have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1994

Raja Palyam Paruthi Panchu Sangam and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nad ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-28-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1989 - Sections 2(1), Schedule 1, Item 4, Entry 15, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 24(1), 25, 27, 29, 30, 35, 36, 49, 52, 57, 59 and 63; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 286, 301 and 304; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Rules, 1991 - Rules 27, 30, 32, 33 and 41(2); Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1987; Madras Commercial Crops Act, 1933; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1959; Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1965 - Setion 17; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Live-stock) Markets Act, 1966; Tamil Nadu Act, 1959 - Sections 18; Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 19

Reported in : AIR1996Mad29

subject rubber falls, within the exclusive purview of the parliament. They further contended that the Parliament have enacted Rubber Act, 1947 (Central Act XXIV of 1947) and have also constituted the Rubber Board, All the dealings and transactions on … validity of Ss. 2, 3, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 24, 25, 27, 29, 30, 35, 36, 49, 57 and 59 of the Act and … of produce, etc. for better marketing and for benefit of farmers and traders. The Act has a definition section and among others the term agricultural produce is defined in S. 2(1) of the Act as follows: '(E)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 24 2015

Shirish Pandharinath Joshi and Others Vs. The General Manager, Bosch C ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Jun-24-2015

Subject : Labour and Industrial

challenged the decision of the Industrial Tribunal before this Court. This Court in its decision in The Dunlop Rubber Co. (India) Ltd. v. Workmen and others (1960) 2 SCR 51, rendered on October 16, 1959, upheld the … made partly absolute. Model Standing Orders framed under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2(p), Section 2(s), Section 18(1) - Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rule 62(4) €“ Retirement - Enhancement … age of 58 years or they would be covered by Standing Order 27 of the Model Standing Orders framed under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2016

State of Kerala, represented by Joint Commissioner (Law) Vs. M/s. M.R. ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-06-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

supported by the Explanatory Note to the Notification. 13. Rubber Board is established under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947. Annexure R1(b) affidavit of the Corporate Manager of the assessee is filed placing therewith the certificate dated 13.06.2011 … Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. These revisions under Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and original petitions stand remitted by the Hon'ble Supreme … was deposited by MRF in terms of order of this Court dated 27.1.2009 in SLP(C) No.909 of 2009 is concerned, the said amount shall continue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 1959

Superintending Engineer and ors. Vs. Workmen of Machkund Hydro Electri ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-12-1959

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1), 15 and 25G; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1960Ori205

the question came to be incidentally considered in a recent Madras case in Management of India Tyre and Rubber Co. (India) Private Ltd. v. Workers of the India Tyre and Rubber Co., (India) Private Ltd., AIR 1958 … in all these cases as aforesaid was not the 'appropriate Government' within the meaning of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947) and accordingly the said reference having been invalid, it was contended that the awards … these petitions which were analogously heard.2. The appropriate Government as defined in Section 2(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947) means … of the Conference that in Nagarjun Sugar Control Board meeting held on 27-6-1956 it was decided to give preference to workers retrenched from Tungabhadra and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2014

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

in the District of Malabar and South Canera. Another enactment which needs to be noticed is the Plantation Rubber Act, 1951 and the Kerala Plantation Rubber Rules, 1991 which managed registration of all plantations of 5 acres or … taken over thereunder: These acts include:1. The Indian Forests Act, 1927.2. The Coffee Act, 1942.3. The Rubber Act, 1947.4. The Tea Act, 1953.5. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1980.6. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980.7. The Spices Board Act, … 2003 Act was passed by the State Legislature and notified on 06.06.2005. Section 1(2) further provided that the 2003 Act shall be deemed to have … 3795, 7042, 34524, 30930 and 18134 of 2006 W.P(C) Nos.29245, 22661, 29466, 27296, 32740, 32767, 36454, 29199, 14064, 34575, 25801, 12594, 14298, 2871, 8127, 1006,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial