Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: rubber act 1947 section 24 · Page 1 of about 451 results (0.027 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 20 1986

Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes) Vs. B ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-20-1986

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 41; Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 12(4), 12(5), 12(6) and 20; Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960; Rubber Rules - Rule 33D; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act; Andhra Pradesh Distillery Rules; Central Excise Act; Central Excise Rules

Reported in : 1987(11)ECC96; 1988(33)ELT664(Ker)

Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act.2. Rubber cess is' payable under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 (Central Act 24 of 1947). Section 12 as it originally stood is extracted below :'Imposition of rubber cess.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 1982

Madras Rubber Factory Limited (Mrf Limited), Madras Vs. Rubber Board, ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-10-1982

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1) and 12(2); Rubber Rules, 1955 - Rule 33D; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1982Ker257; 1984(3)ECC328; 1984(17)ELT81(Ker)

Factory Limited under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a declaration that Section 12(1) of the Rubber Act 24 of 1947 (for short the 'Act') is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution if construed as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1970

Shri Krishna Rubber Works Vs. the Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-1970

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1971)73BOMLR496

Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of a levy under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947, as amended in 1960 and the Rules framed thereunder and recoveries made and demand notice issued in respect

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 25 1993

L. Venkateswara Rao and ors. Vs. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Re ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-25-1993

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 - Rule 26(3); Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15 and 21(5); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16 and 23; Constitution of India - Article 265

Reported in : 1993(3)ALT199

Association v. Union of India, : [1970]2SCR68 . It was a case arising under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947. Prior to the amendment made by the Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960, the duty of excise was payable under … by the Central Government may enter and inspect any mine and exercise such other power as mentioned in Section 24.17. Under the Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966, no person shall undertake quarrying of any minor mineral

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1999

Modistone Limited Vs. Secretary (Labour) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-29-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(3), 23 and 24

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)872; 80(1999)DLT803; 1999(50)DRJ788; (2000)ILLJ90Del

Delhi-65 and its workmen as represented by Employee Union Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. of India Pvt. Ltd., H.No. 1685, Bhagirath Palace, Delhi-6 has been … in exercise of the powers conferred by the sub-section 3 of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, I, Chaman Lal, Secretary (Labour), Govt. of the National Capital Territory of Delhi prohibit the continuance of lock-out … in Bombay was legal because it was declared subsequent to a legal notice as per the provisions of Section 24(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Bombay Factory being the nucleus of the operations of the petitioner-Company,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1996

Tata Memorial Centre Vs. Sanjay Sharma (Dr.) and ors

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-14-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [1997(75)FLR4]; (1997)IIILLJ241Bom

on under the authority of the Central Govermnent, within the meaning of Section 24 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. : (1981)ILLJ103SC - Ajay Hasia etc. v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi and Ors etc. : (1988)IILLJ423SC - C. V. … Cash Receipt is signed by you with the address of Tata Memorial Hospital. You have also put your rubber stamp with the address of Tata Memorial Hospital on the receipt. By the said act you have falsely

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1950

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-14-1950

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908 - Sections 1 and 15(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(4); Madras Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

Salt Act IV [4] of 1899, Section 3, Clause (k); Rubber Production and Marketing Act (XXIV [24] of 1947), Section 3 (1), Clause (v); the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (xv [15] of 1908), Section 3, Clause (8) ;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1994

Raja Palyam Paruthi Panchu Sangam and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nad ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-28-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1989 - Sections 2(1), Schedule 1, Item 4, Entry 15, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 24(1), 25, 27, 29, 30, 35, 36, 49, 52, 57, 59 and 63; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 286, 301 and 304; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Rules, 1991 - Rules 27, 30, 32, 33 and 41(2); Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1987; Madras Commercial Crops Act, 1933; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1959; Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1965 - Setion 17; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Live-stock) Markets Act, 1966; Tamil Nadu Act, 1959 - Sections 18; Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 19

Reported in : AIR1996Mad29

subject rubber falls, within the exclusive purview of the parliament. They further contended that the Parliament have enacted Rubber Act, 1947 (Central Act XXIV of 1947) and have also constituted the Rubber Board, All the dealings and transactions on … in sub-sec. (2) of S. 10. Section 12 deals with election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman of Market Committee. Section 24 deals with levy of fee by market committee. Sub-section (1) of S. 24 reads thus: '(1)The market committee

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2014

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-17-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

in the District of Malabar and South Canera. Another enactment which needs to be noticed is the Plantation Rubber Act, 1951 and the Kerala Plantation Rubber Rules, 1991 which managed registration of all plantations of 5 acres or … taken over thereunder: These acts include:1. The Indian Forests Act, 1927.2. The Coffee Act, 1942.3. The Rubber Act, 1947.4. The Tea Act, 1953.5. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1980.6. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980.7. The Spices Board Act, … 2003 Act was passed by the State Legislature and notified on 06.06.2005. Section 1(2) further provided that the 2003 Act shall be deemed to have … THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON1710-2014, ALONG WITH WPC.NO. 24819/2003 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON1711-2014 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts WP(C).NO.26691/2010 APPENDIX

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2016

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Om Kanwar

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-14-2016

Subject : Labour and Industrial

SCR 85 : (1965) 1 LLJ 462 : 27 FJR 232] , Workmen of Messrs Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company of India (P) Ltd. v. Management [(1973) 1 SCC 813 : 1973 SCC (LandS) 341 : AIR … penalty of removal from service upon Om Kanwar. Application was filed under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking approval to the order imposed by the Disciplinary Authority resulting in ID No.219/1994 being registered. 5. On … learned Presiding Officer of the Labour Court returned a verdict on September 24, 2004 holding that in view of the order passed by the learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial