Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: rubber act 1947 section 23 · Page 1 of about 461 results (0.037 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 09 1988

M.Ct.M. Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Madras and ors. Vs. the Director of Enf ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-09-1988

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 54; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 5, 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 12(2), 17, 18-A, 18-B, 23 and 23(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1964

Reported in : AIR1989Mad141

62186-43 receivable by the fifth appellant on account of sale of Nataraja Rubber Estate in 1959 was delayed; (ii) that the fifth appellant in contravention … appellants who were initially charged for having contravened the provisions of Section 10(1)(b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) were later on proceeded against departmentally for- contravention of the provisions of … in its balance sheet and in the returns of income tax for the relevant years.5. When proceedings under Section 23 of the Act were taken, the case of the appellants was that they were not guilty of any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1999

Modistone Limited Vs. Secretary (Labour) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-29-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(3), 23 and 24

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)872; 80(1999)DLT803; 1999(50)DRJ788; (2000)ILLJ90Del

Delhi-65 and its workmen as represented by Employee Union Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. of India Pvt. Ltd., H.No. 1685, Bhagirath Palace, Delhi-6 has been … in exercise of the powers conferred by the sub-section 3 of the Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, I, Chaman Lal, Secretary (Labour), Govt. of the National Capital Territory of Delhi prohibit the continuance of lock-out … International Ltd. The lock-out during the pendency of the industrial dispute is thus forbidden under the provisions of Section 23(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as he said Act). The relevant extract of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 1992

Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. and 3 ors. Vs. Rajasthan Textile Mazdoor Panc ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-16-1992

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A and 23

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ1143Raj; 1993(1)WLC678

the Tribunal that the two workmen had participated in a strike which was illegal because of violation of Section 23 of 1947 Act, is correct. The facts which have come on record show that an industrial dispute was … interpreted by the Supreme Court in The Workmen of Firestbne Tyre and Rubber Co. v. The Management, (1973-I-LLJ-278) and observed that the Tribunal or Labour … service. Applications were filed by the employer under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, I947(for short 'the Act, 1947') before the Labour Court, Jaipur for approval of its action of terminating the services of the workmen. These

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 26 1996

Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax Vs. Rubber Board

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-26-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(6), 8, 9A and 9B; Rubber Act, 1947

Reported in : [1997]226ITR722(Ker)

necessary to refer to the provisions of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950, as also the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947. Section 4(1)(b) of the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950, reads as follows ;'4(1)(b). Any agricultural income derived from property … interested. This was done relying on the observations of the Karnataka High Court, which is extracted at page 23 of the paper book.5. Learned counsel appearing for the Department reiterated the contentions which were put forward before

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 02 1986

Bright Trading Co. Vs. the Rubber Board and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-02-1986

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 14, 15 and 23; ;Rubber Rules, 1955 - Rule 43B

Reported in : AIR1987Cal169

in accordance with the terms and conditions laid down in the licence and also the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947 and the Rubber Rules, 1955. Under the provisions of the Act and the Rules and also the terms … petition as well as the application for vacating the interim order are both disposed of finally as above. 23. There will be no order as to costs. 24. Oral prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 1996

Director of Enforcement Vs. M/S. Mctm. Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and Other ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-09-1996

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 17, 18(A and B) and 23(1); Constitution of India - Articles 20(2) and 226; General Clauses Act, 1897; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167(8) and 188

Reported in : 1996IAD(SC)646; AIR1996SC1100; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)777; [1997]88CompCas449(SC); 1996CriLJ1623; 1996(54)ECC41; JT1996(1)SC79; 1996(1)SCALE133; (1996)2SCC471; [1996]1SCR215

foreign exchange of Malaysian b 62186.42 being the sale proceeds of Nataraja Rubber Estate and Malaysian b 1,25,000, being the Social Welfare Prize money won … Directors were proceeded against departmentally for having contravened the provisions of Section 10(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the FERA, 1947'). The gravamen of the departmental case against the respondents was that … Rs. 20,000 on each of the Directors and a penalty of Rs. 2,00,000 on the respondent company, Under Section 23(1)(a) of FERA, 1947. Against the order dated 19.9.1977 the respondents filed five separate appeals before the Appellate Board.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2013

Smt. Shanti Devi Vs. Pankaj

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Aug-22-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

news item what has been indicated was that in the company, Nikhil Rubber (P) Ltd., the appellant was only a Director along with Mrs. Neelu … from Bombay where the Court had to consider the provisions of s. 3(1) of the Bombay Hindu Divorce Act, 1947, whose lan- guage is in pari materia with that of s. 10(1) of the Act. In the judgment … the Act which enumer- ates the grounds on which a petition for judicial separation may be presented nor section 23 which governs the jurisdiction of the court to pass a decree in any proceeding under the Act requires

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2013

Pankaj Bhatnagar Vs. Smt. Shanti Devi @ Pappi and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Aug-22-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

news item what has been indicated was that in the company, Nikhil Rubber (P) Ltd., the appellant was only a Director along with Mrs. Neelu … from Bombay where the Court had to consider the provisions of s. 3(1) of the Bombay Hindu Divorce Act, 1947, whose lan- guage is in pari materia with that of s. 10(1) of the Act. In the judgment … the Act which enumer- ates the grounds on which a petition for judicial separation may be presented nor section 23 which governs the jurisdiction of the court to pass a decree in any proceeding under the Act requires

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2005

T.T.K.-lig Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-16-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(193)ELT169TriDel

importation, to the extent equal to the duty of excise levied as cess under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 on rubber produced/manufactured in India as on the said date? 2. It appears that the appellants had challenged … in R.C. Jail v. Union of India reported in 1998 (001) SCC 0616 SC (Paragraphs 13, 14 and 23), Barnagore jute Factory Co. v. Inspector of Central Excise and the decision of theAndhra Pradesh Paper Mills Ltd.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1994

Raja Palyam Paruthi Panchu Sangam and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nad ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-28-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1989 - Sections 2(1), Schedule 1, Item 4, Entry 15, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 24(1), 25, 27, 29, 30, 35, 36, 49, 52, 57, 59 and 63; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 286, 301 and 304; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Rules, 1991 - Rules 27, 30, 32, 33 and 41(2); Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1987; Madras Commercial Crops Act, 1933; Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1959; Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1965 - Setion 17; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Live-stock) Markets Act, 1966; Tamil Nadu Act, 1959 - Sections 18; Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 19

Reported in : AIR1996Mad29

subject rubber falls, within the exclusive purview of the parliament. They further contended that the Parliament have enacted Rubber Act, 1947 (Central Act XXIV of 1947) and have also constituted the Rubber Board, All the dealings and transactions on … and the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1959 (Tamil Nadu Act 23 of 1959) was enacted, which included various other agricultural produces as per … of produce, etc. for better marketing and for benefit of farmers and traders. The Act has a definition section and among others the term agricultural produce is defined in S. 2(1) of the Act as follows: '(E)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial