Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: rubber act 1947 section 21 · Page 1 of about 521 results (0.058 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 29 1989

Madras Rubber Factory Limited Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-29-1989

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1989]74STC56(Ker)

Act, 1947, as it stood originally and after its amendment by Act 21 of 1960, Rule 33-D of the Rubber Rules and also Section 2(xxvii) … arises for consideration in these cases is whether the cess payable and paid by the manufacturers, under the Rubber Act, 1947 and the Rules, will form part of their purchase turnover, under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. In … 1976-77 and 1977-78. The sole respondent in these three revisions is the Revenue. In these revisions, filed under Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, the revision petitioner prays to set aside or annul the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1997

State of Kerala Vs. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1997

Subject : Sales TaxExcise

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 5; Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 12 and 12(1); Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960; Rubber Rules - Rule 33D

Reported in : AIR1998SC723; JT1997(10)SC298; 1998(1)KLT201(SC); 1997(7)SCALE804; (1998)1SCC616; [1997]Supp6SCR698; [1998]108STC583(SC)

arises for consideration in this batch of cases is whether the cess payable under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947 will form part of the purchase turnover of the respondents under the Kerala General Sales Tax, 1963.3. M/s. … Act.'9. Section 12 of the Rubber Act, after its amendment by Act 21 of 1960, is extracted herein below :'Imposition of new rubber cess : … the State of Kerala or was sent out of the State for use elsewhere.4. Under the provisions of Section 5 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Sales Tax Act') the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1986

Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes) Vs. B ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-20-1986

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 41; Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 12(4), 12(5), 12(6) and 20; Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960; Rubber Rules - Rule 33D; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act; Andhra Pradesh Distillery Rules; Central Excise Act; Central Excise Rules

Reported in : 1987(11)ECC96; 1988(33)ELT664(Ker)

Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act.2. Rubber cess is' payable under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 (Central Act 24 of 1947). Section 12 as it originally stood is extracted below :'Imposition of rubber cess.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 25 1993

L. Venkateswara Rao and ors. Vs. Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Re ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-25-1993

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 - Rule 26(3); Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15 and 21(5); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16 and 23; Constitution of India - Article 265

Reported in : 1993(3)ALT199

Association v. Union of India, : [1970]2SCR68 . It was a case arising under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947. Prior to the amendment made by the Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960, the duty of excise was payable under … may also recover from such person, rent, royalty or tax, as the case may be, as provided under Section 21.16. Any person authorised by the Central Government may enter and inspect any mine and exercise such other power

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2004

Jay Shree Tea Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Industrial Tribunal-i and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-28-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6W

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC959

been filed by Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., a public sector company, and Jay Shree Tyres and Rubber Products as well as Sri R. P. Verma, a share holder in Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., … share holder in Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., to declare Section 6W of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as constitutionally bad and invalid, violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, and for a writ … Allahabad, 'on leave and licence,' basis w.e.f. 1.2.1977 under an agreement dated 21.2.1977 for a period of 12 years, with an option for renewal of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2016

Flextronics Technologies (India) Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-18-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(SC)], the Supreme Court was concerned with a question whether the cess payable under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947, will form part of the purchase turnover of the company under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act or … (Prayer: Tax Case Revision filed under Section 60 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2005 read with Rule 14 of the Tamil Nadu … hearing granted on 19.9.2011, the Assessing Officer passed a revised order dated 21.10.2011 demanding tax on a price that included Anti-Dumping Duty. This revision was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1992

Neeli and ors. Vs. Padmanabha Pillai Narayana Pillai and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-28-1992

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 92A, 92A(1), 92A(2) and 92A(3)

Reported in : 1993ACJ188; [1993]77CompCas62(Ker)

industrial law, when beneficial provisions of a far-reaching nature were introduced by Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Supreme Court in Workmen of Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. v. Management [1973] 43 FJR 315 ; … NDTC, : (1986)IILLJ217SC , that the provision was retrospective and applied even to awards passed prior to August 21, 1984, a date appointed by the Central Government, if the awards had not become final. In each of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2010

Sh. Dhir Singh Beldar Vs. the Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-26-2010

Subject : Labour and Industrial

upheld by the Labour Court. Hon'ble the Supreme Court in case of Workmen of M/s Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company of India (P) Limited v. The Management and Ors. : 1973 (3) SCR 587, has laid down … his part, the same amounts to retrenchment and since the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') have not been complied with, the Workman would be entitled to reinstatement … resume duties within ten days be issued. Accordingly, two registered notices dated 21.10.1993 and 06.11.1993 (Ex.R1 and Ex.R2 respectively) were sent to the Workman. Despite

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2005

Bhudar Chandra Pal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-21-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10A, 10(1), 11A, 15(1), 15(2) and 17AA; ;West Bengal Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1969; ;Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226

Reported in : 2006(1)CHN469

misconduct alleged against the workman has been established or not. This Court in Workmen of Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. of India (P)Ltd. v. Management, : (1973)ILLJ278SC , held that since the introduction of Section 11A in … 3 with his utomost sincerity and honesty. The petitioner is an workman within the meaning of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.2. The petitioner challenges an order passed by the respondent No. 2 whereby the said respondent refused to entertain … of the rival contentions. The respondent No. 2 by an order dated 21/02/2003 rejected the application for interim relief by holding that no prima facie

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2005

Regina Vs. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) Ex ...

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : Feb-16-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Court of Session had to decide whether, having regard to section 21 of the Crown Proceedings Act 1947, it could grant an order for specific performance against the Scottish Ministers. One of the judges in the … In short, any argument that Mr Copple might in any event on the adjudication have been expected to rubber-stamp the governor's order is really subsumed in the main argument that he had already by then committed himself

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial