Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: rubber act 1947 section 20 · Page 1 of about 538 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 29 1989

Madras Rubber Factory Limited Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-29-1989

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1989]74STC56(Ker)

arises for consideration in these cases is whether the cess payable and paid by the manufacturers, under the Rubber Act, 1947 and the Rules, will form part of their purchase turnover, under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. In … fix the period in respect of which assessments shall be made and(b) without prejudice to the provisions of Section 20, every owner of an estate shall furnish to the Board a return stating the total amount of rubber

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1986

Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes) Vs. B ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-20-1986

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 41; Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 12(4), 12(5), 12(6) and 20; Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960; Rubber Rules - Rule 33D; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act; Andhra Pradesh Distillery Rules; Central Excise Act; Central Excise Rules

Reported in : 1987(11)ECC96; 1988(33)ELT664(Ker)

Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act.2. Rubber cess is' payable under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 (Central Act 24 of 1947). Section 12 as it originally stood is extracted below :'Imposition of rubber cess. … fix the period in respect of which assessments shall be made, and(b) without prejudice to the provisions of Section 20, every owner of an estate shall furnish to the Board a return stating the total amount of rubber

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2005

T.T.K.-lig Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-16-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(193)ELT169TriDel

importation, to the extent equal to the duty of excise levied as cess under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 on rubber produced/manufactured in India as on the said date? 2. It appears that the appellants had challenged … a period in respect of which assessments shall be made; and (b) without prejudice to the provisions of Section 20, every owner and every manufacturer shall furnish to the Board a return not later than fifteen days after

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 19 1997

State of Kerala Vs. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1997

Subject : Sales TaxExcise

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 5; Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 12 and 12(1); Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960; Rubber Rules - Rule 33D

Reported in : AIR1998SC723; JT1997(10)SC298; 1998(1)KLT201(SC); 1997(7)SCALE804; (1998)1SCC616; [1997]Supp6SCR698; [1998]108STC583(SC)

arises for consideration in this batch of cases is whether the cess payable under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947 will form part of the purchase turnover of the respondents under the Kerala General Sales Tax, 1963.3. M/s. … fix the period in respect of which assessments shall be made, and(b) without prejudiced to the provisions of Section 20, every owner of an estate shall furnish to the Board a return stating the total amount of rubber

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2010

N.P.K.R.R. Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-11-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

said decision has to be understood in the light of the specific provision contained in Section 12 of Rubber Act 1947 and Section 5 read along with Entry 71 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. Section 12 of … issue involved in these writ petitions is covered by our order passed in W.P.Nos.50111, 50189 and 50190 of 2006, following the same, these cases also stand disposed of on merits.2. The petitioner is common in all the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2005

Bhudar Chandra Pal Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-21-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10A, 10(1), 11A, 15(1), 15(2) and 17AA; ;West Bengal Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1969; ;Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226

Reported in : 2006(1)CHN469

misconduct alleged against the workman has been established or not. This Court in Workmen of Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. of India (P)Ltd. v. Management, : (1973)ILLJ278SC , held that since the introduction of Section 11A in … 3 with his utomost sincerity and honesty. The petitioner is an workman within the meaning of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.2. The petitioner challenges an order passed by the respondent No. 2 whereby the said respondent refused to entertain … 1999(6) p.507 (R. S. Saini v. State of Punjab and Ors.)iii) : 2000(67)ECC16 (High Court of Judicature at Bombay through its Registrar v. Shashikant S.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 2026

Paragon Polymer Products Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Commissioner of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-03-2026

There are two registered trade unions in the petitioner factory namely Paragon Rubber Factory Labour Development affiliated with the Labour Progressive Federation (LPF) which is … Labour (Conciliation), Salem and after several rounds of discussions, settlement under Section 12 (3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was arrived at between the petitioner and the majority trade union on 04.10.2021. The settlement was in Page3 … lodged, 13 workmen affiliated with the 4 th respondent were placed under suspension on 16.02.2026 in violation of Section 20 of the standing orders of the petitioner. The workmen were squatting inside the factory premises, not allowing any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1969

Jullunder Rubber Goods Manufacturers' Association Vs. the Union of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-25-1969

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 248

Reported in : AIR1970SC1589; (1969)2SCC644; [1970]2SCR68

by way of excise duty on the rubber used by manufacturers of chappals under the provisions of the Rubber Act 1947, (Act XXIV of 1947) as amended, hereinafter called the Act, have been assailed.2. M/s. Jullundur Rubber Goods Manufacturers' … fix a period in respect of which assessments shall be made; and(b) without prejudice to the provisions of Section 20, every manufacturer shall furnish to the Board a return not later than fifteen days after the expiry of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1972

The Malankara Rubber and Produce Co. and ors., Etc., Etc. Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-1972

Subject : Property

Acts : Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 -- Sections 81 and 96; Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1969 - Sections 80, 80-A and 81(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 31-A, 31-A(2) and 31-B; Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1964; Kerala Plantations (Additional Tax) Act, 1960 - Sections 2(6)

Reported in : AIR1972SC2027; 1972(0)KLT411(SC); (1972)2SCC492; [1973]1SCR399

of measures passed by the Central Legislature to control various industries, namely, the Tea Act of 1953, the Rubber Act, 1947, The Cardamom Act, 1955, the Coffee Act of 1942 and the coir Act of 1963. The measures in … (respondents 3 to 11) to each of whom he will have to transfer 10 cents of land if Section 80-A of the Act is enforced. The buildings occupied by these respondents do not lie close to one … are also cocoanut gardens, arecanut gardens, teak and eucalyptus plantations.Writ Petition No. 207/1970Petitioner owns lands in Kasargod taluk in excess of the ceiling area.Writ Petition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2004

Rubber Board Vs. General Secretary, Saithankari Plantation Workers' Un ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-23-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Rubber Act, 1947; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 25N, 25N(3) and 25N(6)

Reported in : 2004(2)CHN315,(2004)IIILLJ442Cal

been alleged in the writ petition itself that the Rubber Board being a tatutory body constituted under the Rubber Act, 1947, the Board is directly functioning under the Ministry of Commerce and Industries, Government of India, and the main … order impugned is patently illegal and violative of the principal of natural justice, since the statutory requirements of Section 25N of the Industrial Disputes Act have not also been complied with before passing the order making the … order passed by the Single Bench of this Court dated 16th January, 2004, whereby, the learned Single Judge of this Court was pleased to dismiss

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial