Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: rubber act 1947 section 2 · Page 1 of about 919 results (0.067 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 20 1986

Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes) Vs. B ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-20-1986

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 41; Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 12(4), 12(5), 12(6) and 20; Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960; Rubber Rules - Rule 33D; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act; Andhra Pradesh Distillery Rules; Central Excise Act; Central Excise Rules

Reported in : 1987(11)ECC96; 1988(33)ELT664(Ker)

Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act.2. Rubber cess is' payable under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 (Central Act 24 of 1947). Section 12 as it originally stood is extracted below :'Imposition of rubber cess.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1997

State of Kerala Vs. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-19-1997

Subject : Sales TaxExcise

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 5; Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 12 and 12(1); Rubber (Amendment) Act, 1960; Rubber Rules - Rule 33D

Reported in : AIR1998SC723; JT1997(10)SC298; 1998(1)KLT201(SC); 1997(7)SCALE804; (1998)1SCC616; [1997]Supp6SCR698; [1998]108STC583(SC)

arises for consideration in this batch of cases is whether the cess payable under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947 will form part of the purchase turnover of the respondents under the Kerala General Sales Tax, 1963.3. M/s. … Section 5 of the Act. The relevant provisions of the said Act and the Rules are as follows :'Section 2 (xxvii) :'TURNOVER' means the aggregate amount for which goods are either bought or sold, supplied or distributed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 1959

Superintending Engineer and ors. Vs. Workmen of Machkund Hydro Electri ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-12-1959

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1), 15 and 25G; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1960Ori205

considered in a recent Madras case in Management of India Tyre and Rubber Co. (India) Private Ltd. v. Workers of the India Tyre and Rubber … in all these cases as aforesaid was not the 'appropriate Government' within the meaning of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947) and accordingly the said reference having been invalid, it was contended that the awards … to the merits of each of these petitions which were analogously heard.2. The appropriate Government as defined in Section 2(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act XIV of 1947) means :'(i) in relation to any industrial dispute

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 16 2005

T.T.K.-lig Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-16-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(193)ELT169TriDel

importation, to the extent equal to the duty of excise levied as cess under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947 on rubber produced/manufactured in India as on the said date? 2. It appears that the appellants had challenged

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1969

Jullunder Rubber Goods Manufacturers' Association Vs. the Union of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-25-1969

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 248

Reported in : AIR1970SC1589; (1969)2SCC644; [1970]2SCR68

by way of excise duty on the rubber used by manufacturers of chappals under the provisions of the Rubber Act 1947, (Act XXIV of 1947) as amended, hereinafter called the Act, have been assailed.2. M/s. Jullundur Rubber Goods Manufacturers' … framed and the relevant notification issued thereunder of a duty as a result of the amendment made in Section 12 of the Act by the Rubber Amendment Act of 1960. A learned Single Judge dismissed the writ

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2009

Rubfila International Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-30-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Rubber Act, 1947 - Sections 12(1), 12(2), 12(7) and 25; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2009(3)KLJ443

of India. Further, it is issued by the Central Government without there being any power derived under the Rubber Act, 1947. If the Units engaged in export of Rubber products, such as EOUs, Units situated at SEZs and EPZs … P1, the notification is issued in exercise of power conferred on the Union Government by Sub-section (1) of Section 12 of the Rubber Act 1947 (hereinafter referred as the Act for short). For an easy reference Section … rate and it was noticed that under the Rules framed under Section 25 of the Act all guidelines and control can be introduced.5. In a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1992

Association of Engineering Workers' Trade Union Vs. Sewree Iron and St ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-19-1992

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25C and 25J; Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act, 1946; Bombay Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules, 1959; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1992(65)FLR1022]; (1993)IIILLJ396Bom

proposition as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of The Workmen of Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. of India (P) Ltd. v. The Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. 1976 I LLLJ 493. Mr. Ganguli … complied with the provisions of Section 2(kkk) read with Section 25-C in Chapter V-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It was further submitted by way of written-statement that the workmen were not laid-off under Standing Order 20

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2004

Jay Shree Tea Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Industrial Tribunal-i and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-28-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6W

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC959

been filed by Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., a public sector company, and Jay Shree Tyres and Rubber Products as well as Sri R. P. Verma, a share holder in Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., … share holder in Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., to declare Section 6W of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as constitutionally bad and invalid, violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, and for a writ … and for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 not to enforce the provisions of Section 6W of the Act against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1989

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ruby Rubber Works Ltd.,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-06-1989

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961

Reported in : [1989]178ITR181(Ker)

subsidy scheme framed by the Rubber Board and the provisions of the Rubber Act.14. Section 8 of the Rubber Act, 1947, provides that it shall be the duty of the Board to promote by such measures as it thinks … of the Full Bench. Thus, these cases have come up before us for decision.2. Income Tax References Nos. 217 and 218 of 1980.3. The chief question that arises for consideration in these income-tax references is as to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1994

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Ram Karan Chauhan and a ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-28-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(1), 2A, 10, 11A

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ452Raj

and settlement of industrial disputes and for certain other purposes, hereinafter appearing; It is hereby enacted as follows:' Section 2 of the 1947 Act contains various definitions. 7. Section 2(kkb) defines 'Labour Court' as a Labour Court constituted … Co. Ltd. v. Their Workmen (1958-I-LLJ-260) and Workmen of Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. of India (P.) Ltd. v. Management, (1973-I-LLJ-278). Shri Pareek, learned counsel … Tribunal has committed an error of jurisdiction in invoking the provisions of Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, because that section is attracted only in the cases of dismissal or discharge from service by way of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial