Advanced Search Results
Shri Krishna Rubber Works Vs. the Union of India (Uoi)
Mumbai
Nov-30-1970
Civil
(1971)73BOMLR496
Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of a levy under Section 12 of the Rubber Act, 1947, as amended in 1960 and the Rules framed thereunder and recoveries made and demand notice issued in respect … making cash grants for the development of rubber estates and Section 9-B (2), for rehabilitation of small growers. Section 19 provides for levy of fees for the issue and renewal of licences to dealers in and planters of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRubber Wood India Pvt.Ltd. vs Manojkumar P.S
Kerala
Aug-02-2022
of by the common judgment.3. The first writ petition is on behalf of theRubber Board established under the Rubber Act, 1947 which falls under the aegis of Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. It is aggrieved of … ‘appropriate Government’ provided under Section 2(a)(i) & (ii) and ‘employer’ provided under Section 2(g) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Section 2(a)(i) & (ii)(a) "appropriate Government" means(i) in relation to any industrial disputeconcerning any industry carried on by or … AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 5187 OF 2020 PETITIONERS: 1 RUBBER WOOD INDIA PVT.LTD., REGIONAL
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Rubber Board, vs Manojkumar P.S.,
Kerala
Aug-02-2022
of by the common judgment.3. The first writ petition is on behalf of theRubber Board established under the Rubber Act, 1947 which falls under the aegis of Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. It is aggrieved of … ‘appropriate Government’ provided under Section 2(a)(i) & (ii) and ‘employer’ provided under Section 2(g) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Section 2(a)(i) & (ii)(a) "appropriate Government" means(i) in relation to any industrial disputeconcerning any industry carried on by or … AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 5187 OF 2020 PETITIONERS: 1 RUBBER WOOD INDIA PVT.LTD., REGIONAL
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Agro-industrial Trading Corporation Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
Aug-10-1977
Sales TaxExcise
Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 3(1), 5A and 9; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 14; Finance Act, 1969; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3 and 4; General Sales Tax Act, 1125; Calcutta Improvement Act, 1911 - Sections 71; Calcutta Improvement (Amendment) Act, 1921; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 26(2) and 54; General Clauses Act - Sections 6A, 8 and 8(1); Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1952 - Sections 23A; Customs Act; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 19, 19(1) and 178A; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Madras General Sales Act, 1959; Madras General Sales (Amendment) Act, 1974; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 - Sections 3(1); Punjab Alienation of Land Act, 1900; Imports and
1988(38)ELT618(Ker)
the Madras High Court in State of Tamil Nadu v. East India Rubber Works, Madras - / (33 S.T.C. 399). Exemption was claimed in that … Ram Kirpal v. State of Bihar (AIR 1970 S.C. 951) Section 3(2) of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 provided that all goods to which any prohibition under Sub-section (1) apply 'shall be deemed to be goods, … that the restrictions imposed by certain specified provisions of the Art,'shall be deemed to have been imposed under Section 19 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878, and all the provisions of that Act shall have effect accordingly...'Section 19
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAteesee (Agro-industrial Trading Corporation) Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
Aug-10-1977
Sales Tax
[1978]41STC1(Ker)
the Madras High Court in State of Tamil Nadu v. East India Rubber Works, Madras-1 [1974] 33 S.T.C. 399. Exemption was claimed in that case … Ram Kirpal v. State of Bihar A.I.R. 1970 S.C. 951, Section 3(2) of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, provided that all goods to which any prohibition under Sub-section (1) apply 'shall be deemed to be goods … that the restrictions imposed by certain specified provisions of the Act.shall be deemed to have been imposed under Section 19 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 and all the provisions of that Act shall have effect accordingly...Section 19
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJay Shree Tea Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Industrial Tribunal-i and o ...
Allahabad
Jan-28-2004
Labour and Industrial
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6W
2004(2)AWC959
been filed by Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., a public sector company, and Jay Shree Tyres and Rubber Products as well as Sri R. P. Verma, a share holder in Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., … share holder in Jay Shree Tea and Industries Ltd., to declare Section 6W of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as constitutionally bad and invalid, violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, and for a writ
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPitambar Das Vs. Rajmata Srimati Shanti Devi
Himachal Pradesh
Jul-30-1956
Civil
Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 36 and 61 - Schedule - Article 1; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 13, Rule 4; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 19
AIR1957HP23
were that the Judge's initials had been placed on a document by third person by means of a rubber stamp. Under those circumstances, Phillips and Wallace, JJ., observed that: "A document, although endorsed according to Order 13, … objection cannot subsequently be raised." (3) Ponusami Chettiar v. Kailasam Chettiar, AIR 1947 Mad 422 (H). There, a learned Judge of that High Court held … higher authorities. In the opinion of the learned District Judge, these two admissions fall within the purview of Section 19 of the Limitation Act, and would, therefore, save limitation. Mr. Man Mohan Nath, on the other hand, pleaded
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelhi Transport Corporation Vs. Om Kanwar
Delhi
Jan-14-2016
Labour and Industrial
SCR 85 : (1965) 1 LLJ 462 : 27 FJR 232] , Workmen of Messrs Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company of India (P) Ltd. v. Management [(1973) 1 SCC 813 : 1973 SCC (LandS) 341 : AIR … penalty of removal from service upon Om Kanwar. Application was filed under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking approval to the order imposed by the Disciplinary Authority resulting in ID No.219/1994 being registered. 5. On … Pradeep Nandrajog, J. 1. It was the sixth day of January, 1993. Bus No.990 belonging to the Delhi Transport Corporation was plying on the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Kanpur Region Vs. Babu Singh an ...
Allahabad
Apr-01-2003
Labour and Industrial
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(6)
2003(3)AWC2433; [2003(97)FLR1160]
as the award is subject to judicial review in writ jurisdiction. (Vide The Workmen of Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. of India P. Ltd. v. Management and Ors. : (1973)ILLJ278SC ; Rama Kant Misra v. State of … industrial dispute and the appropriate Government in exercise of its power under Section 4K of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the Act 1947), made a reference vide order dated 19.5.1992 as to whether the removal of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Management of Apsrtc Rep. by Its Vice Chairman and Managing Direct ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-22-2008
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 9A, 10(1), 10(4), 12(3), 18(1), 18(2), 19(2) and 32; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 2(4), 2(13), 5, 10, 11, 12, 32 and 36; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1958; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1970; ;Rajasthan Act - Sections 9C, 9D, 9E, 9F and 9G; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Andhra Pradesh Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1987; Constitution of India - Article 226
2008(4)ALD422; 2008(3)ALT774; (2009)ILLJ439AP
Jaipur Udyog Limited v. The Cement Work Karmachari Sangh, Sahu Nagar [1972] I LLJ 437, Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company of India Private Limited v. Workmen [1981] II LLJ 218, and Senior Regional Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation … under Clause (1) for registration of the union having the largest number of employees, neither the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 nor the A.P. state amendments made thereto, from time to time, provide for any such requirement of registration … aggrieved by the award of the Industrial Tribunal, Hyderabad, in I.D. No. 19 of 1997 dated 06.02.1998, wherein it was held that employees of the … was arrived at between the majority union and the petitioner management, under Section 12(3) of the I.D. Act, the Tribunal observed that there was no
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »